Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- A Tribute To A.L. Philpott (1)
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Aliff v. Joy Manufacturing Co (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law Articles (1)
- CAA (1)
-
- Cameras In Virginia Courtrooms (1)
- Citizens for Clean Air v. State Air Pollution Control Board (1)
- Clean Air Act (1)
- Dedication (1)
- Environmental litigation (1)
- F.R.C.P. Rule 11 (1)
- FERC (1)
- Federal Energy Regula- tory Commission (1)
- General Assembly (1)
- Hazardous Waste Treatment Council v. South Carolina (1)
- In Re Sierra Club (1)
- Index (1)
- Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation (1)
- NEPA (1)
- NHPA (1)
- National Environmental Policy Act (1)
- National Historic Preservation Act (1)
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. EPA (1)
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Reilly (1)
- On The Passing of A.L. Philpott (1)
- PSD (1)
- PURPA (1)
- Perspective (1)
- Prevention of Significant Deterioration (1)
- Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Environmental Litigation And Rule 11, Carl W. Tobias
Environmental Litigation And Rule 11, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
The 1983 amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 has been the most controversial revision in the half-century history of the Federal Rules. Judges have applied amended Rule 11, which requires them to sanction lawyers and parties who do not conduct reasonable inquiries before filing papers, in over 1000 reported opinions, considerably more unreported determinations, and numerous informal contexts. The Rule has engendered much unnecessary satellite litigation and has been implemente4 inconsistently, while attorneys' fees remain the "sanction of choice" for violations. Rule 11 activity has especially disadvantaged civil rights plaintiffs and lawyers, whose lack of resources can make …
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Environmental Law, Theodore R. Kingsley, Carole M. Agee
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Environmental Law, Theodore R. Kingsley, Carole M. Agee
University of Richmond Law Review
This article addresses significant developments in Virginia law pertaining to air quality, water quality and solid and hazardous waste which have occurred between the publication of the 1990 survey and May 1, 1992.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.