Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Bench and Bar (5)
- Indiana District Courts (5)
- Indiana Bar (4)
- Pleading (4)
- Book Review (2)
-
- Book reviews (2)
- Claims (2)
- Due process (2)
- Juries (2)
- Mescall v. Tully (2)
- Negligence (2)
- Ohio (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Theory of the Case (2)
- Trials (2)
- 1929-30 (1)
- Administrative decisions (1)
- Administrative tribunals (1)
- Allegiance (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Appeal and Error (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate Jurisdiction of Circuit Courts of Appeals (1)
- Appellate procedure (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Automobile accidents (1)
- Blackmer v. United States (1)
- British occupation (1)
- Broadcasting stations (1)
- Bus companies (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
What Price Jury Trials, Jeff B. Fordham
What Price Jury Trials, Jeff B. Fordham
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Courts, The Press, And The Public, Stuart H. Perry
The Courts, The Press, And The Public, Stuart H. Perry
Michigan Law Review
It was with especial gratification that I accepted this invitation to speak. It is a pleasure to be with you, and it affords me an opportunity to contribute to a discussion of matters that are of great importance to your profession and my own and to the public. Perhaps I should not thus separate myself from your profession. I am still at least nominally a member of the bar, and though it is many years since I last appeared in court I have a keen and sympathetic interest in legal matters and enjoy my contacts with the bench and bar …
Motions To Make Specific And To Resolve Conclusions, Walter R. Arnold
Motions To Make Specific And To Resolve Conclusions, Walter R. Arnold
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Appeal And Error - General Verdict On Several Counts- Several Specifications Of Negligence As Constituting One Cause Of Action
Michigan Law Review
In a highway accident case the plaintiff made five distinct allegations of negligence: failure to place lights upon a plank which had been placed across a highway; failure to remove the plank; permitting and suffering the plank to be placed where it was dangerous to travel; failure to construct poles, gates, and guards so that persons using the highway would be informed of the dangerous situation; and failure to employ a watchman to warn the public of the existence of the obstruction. Held, there was but one act of negligence, hence but one cause of action. Therefore, an erroneous …
Report On Criminal Procedure, Rollin M. Perkins
Report On Criminal Procedure, Rollin M. Perkins
Michigan Law Review
During the period of trial by battle such a proceeding served, in addition to its nominal purpose, something of the function which is now served by a World's Series ball game. From that time to this, the trial has been the spectacular aspect of the enforcement of justice in general and of criminal justice in particular. The result has been relative overemphasis upon criminal procedure in the strictly technical sense, and a corresponding neglect of the broader problems of administration. If, for instance, a conviction under a statute making it grand larceny to steal "a cow or animal of the …
Progress Report On The Study Of The Federal Courts, Edson R. Sunderland
Progress Report On The Study Of The Federal Courts, Edson R. Sunderland
Michigan Law Review
Report No. 7 is a progress report on the study of the Federal Courts. It describes the plan and scope of the study and presents the results which have been obtained in the only district where sufficiently complete data have been obtained to justify tabulation, namely, the district of Connecticut.
Report On The Child Offender In The Federal System Of Justice, Fred R. Johnson
Report On The Child Offender In The Federal System Of Justice, Fred R. Johnson
Michigan Law Review
The Report concerning child offenders in the federal system of justice is a joint report for the National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement and the White House Conference on Child Health and Protection. The study on which the report is based was conducted by Dr. Miriam van Waters, for many years the referee of the Juvenile Court of Los Angeles. Her choice to direct this study is to be commended. Not only was she in intimate contact with children who were offenders in California, but her experience in varied capacities has made her familiar with juvenile delinquency and its …
Constitutional Law--Compelling Witness Duty From Absent Nationals
Constitutional Law--Compelling Witness Duty From Absent Nationals
Michigan Law Review
One Blackmer, a citizen of the United States wanted as a witness in the prosecution of Fall and Sinclair, removed to France. Primarily for the purpose of compelling him to return as a witness, Congress enacted, in 1926, the statute commonly known as the Walsh Act. This act provides that whenever the Attorney General or any assistant or district attorney acting under him desires as a witness in a criminal action a person abroad who is a "citizen of the United States or domiciled therein," a subpoena may be issued addressed to a United States consul to be served by …
State Juvenile Court Procedure For Federal Juvenile Offenders, Howard E. Wahrenbrock
State Juvenile Court Procedure For Federal Juvenile Offenders, Howard E. Wahrenbrock
Michigan Law Review
The Report on the Child Offender in the Federal System of Justice recommends the enactment of federal legislation which will provide means of utilizing the machinery of existing state juvenile courts where federal laws have been violated by children. The details of such legislation are not suggested in the Report. The legal questions to be encountered in the framing of such legislation call for careful consideration if full advantage is to be taken of the knowledge which the study made for the Commission furnishes. Some of the questions of more general interest will be taken as the subject of this …
Foreign Judgments-Defense Of Fraud
Pleading-Appeal And Error-Theory Of The Case
Pleading-Appeal And Error-Theory Of The Case
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Writ Of Coram-Double Jeopardy Limitations
Courts-Removal Of Causes-Jurisdictional Amount
Courts-Removal Of Causes-Jurisdictional Amount
Michigan Law Review
Two suits for personal injuries, in each of which a claim for $5,000 was made, were removed to the federal court by defendant. Plaintiff's counsel in his opening statement said that as the result of the injuries one plaintiff was unable to work for two weeks and visited his doctor seven times and that the other was away from work for three weeks and also saw his doctor seven times. The wages of the first plaintiff were $55 a week; those of the second averaged $75 a week. He further stated that the injuries were not permanent, and that, except …
Courts-Power To Direct Verdicts Where Forbidden By State Constitution
Courts-Power To Direct Verdicts Where Forbidden By State Constitution
Michigan Law Review
ln a suit for personal injuries the district court of the United States for the district of Arizona directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The constitution of Arizona, sec. 5, art. 18 provides: "The defense of contributory negligence or of assumption of risk shall, in all cases whatsoever, be a question of fact and shall, at all times, be left to the jury." Held, that this section is not binding on a federal court sitting in Arizona, and does not prevent such court from directing a verdict when …
Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders
Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders
Michigan Law Review
The public utility commission of Ohio refused to permit the plaintiff motor bus company to operate over a portion of the route for which application was made for a certificate. The plaintiff applied to the federal district court for an injunction against enforcement of the commission's order on the ground that it amounted to a deprivation of property without due process. A temporary injunction was granted. Thereafter, the plaintiff took a statutory appeal to the state supreme court, which affirmed the order, after which the plaintiff sought a permanent injunction in the federal court. Held, the decision of the …
Administrative Finality, A. Martin Tollefson
Administrative Finality, A. Martin Tollefson
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this article is two-fold. In the first place it is intended to set forth certain determining factors (a) as to whether or not administrative decisions are subject to review in cases where their finality is challenged before the courts and (b) if subject to review, to what extent. The second purpose is to call attention to the need for improvement in this country along the lines of executive or administrative justice from the standpoint of better agencies and better- facilities for disposing of litigated questions within the administrative tribunals. It should be said at the outset, however, …
Trusts-Power Of Equity To Relieve Against The Provisions Of The Trust Instrument
Trusts-Power Of Equity To Relieve Against The Provisions Of The Trust Instrument
Michigan Law Review
Because of the amount of wealth involved and the prominence of the participants, the recent decision of Surrogate Foley in the surrogate's court of New York county in construing the will of the late Joseph Pulitzer has attracted much public attention. The decision is not without its interest to the legal profession. Mr. Pulitzer in his will expressly prohibited the trustees from selling under any circumstances whatever any stock of the Press Publishing Company, publishers of the "New York World" newspapers. Aside from the shares of stock left in trust the remaining shares are owned by the trustees, Mr. Pulitzer's …
Federal Practice--Unconstitionality Of A State Statutye-Requirement Of A Three-Judge Court
Federal Practice--Unconstitionality Of A State Statutye-Requirement Of A Three-Judge Court
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff corporation applied for a preliminary injunction in a suit to restrain the collection of a state franchise tax on the ground that the tax law was unconstitutional under the federal Constitution. After the complaint had been filed and a temporary restraining order had been granted, the defendant moved to dismiss the bill for want of equity, and upon a hearing of the motion the bill was dismissed. The plaintiff then appealed to the circuit court of appeals where the law was held to be unconstitutional and the judgment was reversed. Held, the single judge had no jurisdiction …
Courts-Venue-Waiver Of Objection In Federal Courts
Courts-Venue-Waiver Of Objection In Federal Courts
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant railroad, brought an action based on the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U. S. C. A. secs. 51-59, for injuries sustained from a defective locomotive boiler. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendant was an inhabitant of the federal. district in which the action was brought. The court below directed a verdict for the defendant, as the plaintiff's proof did not tend to show negligence as required by the act, 45 U. S. C. A. sec. 51. On appeal, it was held that as the plaintiff's petition went far towards establishing a good cause …
Prohibition-Against Enforcement Of Order To Produce Documents-Availability Of Other Appellate Relief
Prohibition-Against Enforcement Of Order To Produce Documents-Availability Of Other Appellate Relief
Michigan Law Review
Application was made to the circuit court of appeals for a writ of prohibition against a district judge to restrain him from compelling petitioner to allow an inspection of his ledger. Held, that although in the opinion of the court the order had been entered improperly, the circuit court of appeals had no jurisdiction to issue a writ of prohibition against enforcement of the order. Keaton v. Kennamer (C. C. A. 10th, 1930) 42 F.(2d) 814.
Administative Tribunals-Judicial Review Of Legislative Functions
Administative Tribunals-Judicial Review Of Legislative Functions
Michigan Law Review
On refusal of the Federal Radio Commission to renew its license for a broadcasting station with the existing terms, on the ground that public convenience and necessity did not require it, the applicant company availed itself of a statutory appeal to the court of appeals of the District of Columbia which reversed the finding as to public convenience and necessity. The commission applied to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. Held, writ dismissed on the theory that the court had no jurisdiction to review the exercise pf an administrative or legislative power, and that the …
Administrative Tribunals--Judicial Notice
Administrative Tribunals--Judicial Notice
Michigan Law Review
The plaintiff corporation, a retail distributor of gas, contracted for its supply over a three-year period from a service company, and filed its rate schedule with the public utilities commission. The commission ordered a lower rate, its order being based on files of schedules of other distributing companies, which were found to show that the plaintiff's contract was excessive and that a lower rate could have been contracted for. These files were not introduced into evidence, but the commission took notice of them as a matter of public record. Plaintiff petitioned for an injunction against enforcement of the order. Held …
Reform Of Legal Procedure: Rulemaking Power For Courts, Sveinbjorn Johnson
Reform Of Legal Procedure: Rulemaking Power For Courts, Sveinbjorn Johnson
Indiana Law Journal
An address delivered to the Indiana State Bar Association at Indianapolis, Thursday, December 18, 1930.
Progress Of The Law In The United States Supreme Court, 1929-30, By Gregory Hankin And Charlotte A. Hankin, Hugh E. Willis
Progress Of The Law In The United States Supreme Court, 1929-30, By Gregory Hankin And Charlotte A. Hankin, Hugh E. Willis
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Pleading-Appeal And Error-Theory Of The Case
Pleading-Appeal And Error-Theory Of The Case
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The New Michigan Court Rules, Edson R. Sunderland
The New Michigan Court Rules, Edson R. Sunderland
Michigan Law Review
There are two features of general interest connected with the revised system of practice which went into operation in Michigan on January 1, 1931. The first is the manner of employing the rule-making power, and the second is the content of the new rules.