Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Law
Eureka Cnty. V. Off. Of State Engr. Of State Of Nev., Div. Of Water Resources, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 84 (Oct. 29, 2015), Chelsea Finnegan
Eureka Cnty. V. Off. Of State Engr. Of State Of Nev., Div. Of Water Resources, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 84 (Oct. 29, 2015), Chelsea Finnegan
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
For the State Engineer to grant water rights applications, there must be evidence to support the decision and the new rights must not substantially conflict with existing rights. On appeal from the District Court, the Court found no evidence to support the granted application, and held the use of Respondent’s rights would severely impact the water table. The Court reversed and remanded the case for proceedings consistent with the opinion.
Modern Odysseus Or Classic Fraud - Fourteen Years In Prison For Civil Contempt Without A Jury Trial, Judicial Power Without Limitation, And An Examination Of The Failure Of Due Process, Mitchell J. Frank
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Quasi-Preemption: Nervous Breakdown In Our Constitutional System, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Quasi-Preemption: Nervous Breakdown In Our Constitutional System, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Partially Prudential Doctrine Of Mootness, Matthew I. Hall
The Partially Prudential Doctrine Of Mootness, Matthew I. Hall
Scholarly Works
The conventional understanding of mootness doctrine is that it operates as a mandatory bar to federal court jurisdiction, derived from the "cases or controversies" clause of the United States Constitution, Article III. In two crucial respects, however, this Constitutional model - which was first adopted by the Supreme Court less than 45 years ago - fails to account for the manner in which courts actually address contentions of mootness. First, the commonly-applied exceptions to the mootness bar are not derived from the "cases or controversies" clause and cannot be reconciled with the Constitutional account of mootness. Second, courts regularly consider …
National Farmers Union Insurance Cos. V. Crow Tribe Of Indians, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
National Farmers Union Insurance Cos. V. Crow Tribe Of Indians, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Valley Forge Christian College V. Americans United For Separation Of Church And State, Inc., Lewis Powell Jr.
Valley Forge Christian College V. Americans United For Separation Of Church And State, Inc., Lewis Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Maryland V. Louisiana, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Maryland V. Louisiana, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Deposit Guaranty National Bank Of Jackson, Mississippi V. Roper, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Deposit Guaranty National Bank Of Jackson, Mississippi V. Roper, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States Parole Commission V. Geraghty, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States Parole Commission V. Geraghty, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. V. Shore, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. V. Shore, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
New York City Transit Authority V. Beazer, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
New York City Transit Authority V. Beazer, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Congressional Papers And Judicial Subpoenas And The Constitution, David H. Kaye
Congressional Papers And Judicial Subpoenas And The Constitution, David H. Kaye
Journal Articles
Some contemporary Congresses have lost sight of the original scope of their predecessors' assertions of privilege and now claim an absolute privilege to withhold both the originals and copies of subpoenaed papers. A few judicial opinions suggest as much or more. It is possible that even cursorily documented, ill-considered dicta can take root and flourish, and to prevent that, this article This article charts the constitutional boundaries of Congress' privilege to withhold its internal papers from judicial subpoena. It surveys the privileges expressly given Congress in the text of the Constitution as well as the privileges that might be implied …
Mathews V. Eldridge, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Mathews V. Eldridge, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Gonzales V. Automatic Employees Credit Union, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Gonzales V. Automatic Employees Credit Union, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Milliken V. Bradley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Milliken V. Bradley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Defunis V. Odegaard, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Defunis V. Odegaard, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Kras, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Kras, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Paris Adult Theatre I V. Slaton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Paris Adult Theatre I V. Slaton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States Department Of Agriculture V. Moreno, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States Department Of Agriculture V. Moreno, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.