Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (490)
- Constitutional Law (436)
- Criminal Law (271)
- Legal Education (261)
- Arts and Humanities (248)
-
- Intellectual Property Law (239)
- Environmental Law (232)
- Law and Society (230)
- International Law (211)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (197)
- Legal Profession (185)
- Business Organizations Law (163)
- Human Rights Law (153)
- Business (148)
- Courts (145)
- Health Law and Policy (144)
- Immigration Law (144)
- Law and Economics (142)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (141)
- Legislation (140)
- Law and Philosophy (138)
- Administrative Law (135)
- Supreme Court of the United States (134)
- Law and Gender (133)
- Legal Writing and Research (131)
- Criminal Procedure (127)
- First Amendment (111)
- Law and Race (110)
- Contracts (109)
- Institution
-
- Columbia Law School (219)
- Brigham Young University Law School (179)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (165)
- University of Chicago Law School (137)
- University of Minnesota Law School (136)
-
- Singapore Management University (133)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (127)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (121)
- Boston University School of Law (114)
- University of Wollongong (114)
- Notre Dame Law School (113)
- Roger Williams University (108)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (106)
- University of Michigan Law School (106)
- Duke Law (103)
- Duquesne University (98)
- University of Georgia School of Law (96)
- American University Washington College of Law (93)
- William & Mary Law School (91)
- George Washington University Law School (75)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (74)
- New York Law School (71)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (68)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (67)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (66)
- Brooklyn Law School (63)
- Georgetown University Law Center (62)
- Louisiana State University (61)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (61)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (61)
- Keyword
-
- Law (129)
- Philosophy (95)
- Theology (93)
- American Religious Democracy (85)
- Hallowed Secularism (85)
-
- Politics (80)
- Arbitration (64)
- Human rights (57)
- Supreme Court (57)
- Intellectual property (55)
- Constitutional law (54)
- Copyright (52)
- Major League Baseball (50)
- Climate change (49)
- Immigration (48)
- Technology (44)
- First Amendment (43)
- Race (42)
- Privacy (41)
- Regulation (41)
- LSU Student Government (40)
- History (39)
- Criminal law (38)
- International law (37)
- Bankruptcy (36)
- Legal education (36)
- Discrimination (35)
- Antitrust (33)
- Federalism (33)
- Patent (31)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (637)
- Articles (313)
- Faculty Publications (230)
- All Faculty Scholarship (181)
- Scholarly Works (162)
-
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (117)
- Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers (Archive) (114)
- Utah Supreme Court Briefs (2000– ) (99)
- Journal Articles (97)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (93)
- Hallowed Secularism (85)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– ) (80)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (75)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (72)
- Publications (71)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (63)
- Minnesota Law Review (61)
- Student Senate Enrolled Legislation (61)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (60)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (59)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (59)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (49)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (47)
- Faculty Articles (46)
- Law Faculty Publications (43)
- Articles & Book Chapters (41)
- Other Publications (41)
- Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers (39)
- Cardozo Law News Brief 2018 (38)
- Georgia Business Court Opinions (38)
- File Type
Articles 3211 - 3240 of 5047
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Chapter 7 Trustee’S Qualified Right Of Immunity May Be No Shield For Intentional, Negligent, Or Grossly Negligent Conduct: Analyzing And Applying The Three-Way Circuit Split, Nataniel E. Arabov
A Chapter 7 Trustee’S Qualified Right Of Immunity May Be No Shield For Intentional, Negligent, Or Grossly Negligent Conduct: Analyzing And Applying The Three-Way Circuit Split, Nataniel E. Arabov
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Quasi-judicial immunity is best understood as a blessing and a curse. A bankruptcy trustee is appointed to act as trustee through an order of the bankruptcy court. In Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, the Supreme Court provided a two-part test to analyze how far judicial immunity extends to persons who perform quasi-judicial functions in connection with their appointment. This test explains whether a judicial appointee is absolutely immune from personal liability to the estate or others. Under the test, a court (1) must decide whether the functions of the individual were historically adjudicative in nature, and (2) must …
Bankruptcy Tourism: How A Comi Change Can Serve As Ammunition In Debt Wars, Taylor Anderson
Bankruptcy Tourism: How A Comi Change Can Serve As Ammunition In Debt Wars, Taylor Anderson
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
In general, Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides a mechanism to recognize a “foreign proceeding.” Upon recognition of a foreign proceeding, the foreign representative will be allowed to sue and be sued in the United States. However, Chapter 15 distinguishes between “foreign main proceedings” and “foreign nonmain proceedings.” Upon recognition of a “foreign main proceeding” section 1520 of the Bankruptcy Code provides for certain automatic relief, including an automatic stay of proceedings against the debtor in the United States. There is no automatic relief conferred upon recognition of a foreign nonmain …
Balancing Principles Of Cooperation And Public Policy In Applying Comity, Kristen Barone
Balancing Principles Of Cooperation And Public Policy In Applying Comity, Kristen Barone
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Comity is a common law legal principle that allows U.S. courts to afford deference to foreign judgments. Comity is utilized as a basis for granting extraterritorial effect to judgments of foreign courts. This principle plays an integral role in a number of cross-border bankruptcy proceedings and has been adopted as a predominate legal principal in the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the “Model Law”), promulgated by the United Nation’s Commission on International Trade, and Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”).
Although American courts have long recognized the need to extend comity to …
Effects Of Licensors’ Duty To Maintain Control Over A Trademark On Licensees’ Ability To Assert Rights Provided Under Section 365 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Arianna Clark
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor may reject or assume an executory contract, including a license for intellectual property. The definition of intellectual property does not include the term “trademark.” Consequently, it is not clear whether a non-debtor licensee can continue using a trademark if the debtor-licensor rejects it. Moreover, there appears to be a consensus forming among courts in that a debtor-licensee cannot assign a license to a third-party without the consent of the licensor. Regardless of which party initiates bankruptcy proceedings, there is a special consideration contemplated by courts– the …
A Union's Duty In Bankruptcy Cases To Fairly Represent Its Constituency, Denise Dessel
A Union's Duty In Bankruptcy Cases To Fairly Represent Its Constituency, Denise Dessel
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), a union, as the sole representative of its workers, has a duty to fairly represent them. This duty entitles a union to fairly represent all employees, “whether members of the union or not, fairly.” A union breaches this duty when its conduct or decisions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or committed in bad faith.
The terms “arbitrary,” “discriminatory,” and “bad faith” have been interpreted through case law. Part I of this memorandum discusses the interpretation of arbitrary conduct; Part II addresses how courts have defined discriminatory conduct; and Part III analyzes how bad faith …
Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: Are Libel And Slander Personal Injury Torts?, Joseph Collini
Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: Are Libel And Slander Personal Injury Torts?, Joseph Collini
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
A bankruptcy court may adjudicate tort claims, including libel and slander against a debtor, if it concludes that it has jurisdiction over those claims. The statutes governing a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction, including title 11 of the United States Code (“The Bankruptcy Code”) and title 28 of the United States Code, are ambiguous. Consequently, the bankruptcy courts are divided as to their jurisdiction over libel and slander claims.
At the heart of this issue is the personal injury tort exception under 28 U.S.C.A. §157(b). The exception specifically limits the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts and states that personal injury torts …
Banks That Collect Debt On Their Own Account Are Not Debt Collectors Under The Fdcpa, Antonia Edwards
Banks That Collect Debt On Their Own Account Are Not Debt Collectors Under The Fdcpa, Antonia Edwards
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the “FDCPA”) was enacted in 1977 to stop debt collectors from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices when collecting consumer debts. The FDCPA was enacted as a response to an abundance of evidence of the use of abusive and deceptive practices by many debt collectors. Collection abuse took many different methods such as threats of violence, telephone calls at unreasonable hours, impersonation, misrepresentation of debts, and collection of information under false pretenses. These unfair practices contributed to household bankruptcies, marital instability, loss of jobs, and invasions of individual privacy. The FDCPA imposes three …
Exercising Dominion And Control; An Initial Transferee’S Liability For Avoidable Transfers, Shelley Fredericks
Exercising Dominion And Control; An Initial Transferee’S Liability For Avoidable Transfers, Shelley Fredericks
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Under section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy trustee may collect the full amount of an avoidable transfer from the initial transferee of a fraudulent or avoidable transfer. Specifically, it provides that, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent that a transfer is avoided…the trustee may recover, for the benefit of the estate, the property transferred or…the value of such property, from the initial transferee of such transfer or the entity for whose benefit such transfer was made.” This section of the Bankruptcy Code gives power to bankruptcy trustees seeking to collect improperly transferred funds, …
Circumstances In Which A Fee Is An Excise Tax Entitled To Priority, Valerie Hammel
Circumstances In Which A Fee Is An Excise Tax Entitled To Priority, Valerie Hammel
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) enumerates several categories in which claims are entitled to receive priority. Indeed, Section 507(a)(8)(E) grants governmental units priority on obligations that are “excise tax[es] on a transaction.” The Bankruptcy Code, however, does not define the universe of circumstances necessary to fall within the excise tax priority category. Governmental units therefore spend considerable efforts litigating to ensure that their claims are granted priority under the Bankruptcy Code. Ultimately, the success of a claim will hinge on how narrowly or broadly a court interprets Section 507(a)(8)(E). Part I of this memorandum …
Conflicts Counsel Is Not A Cure All; It Does Not Overcome An Actual Conflict Of Interest, Stephanie Kenn
Conflicts Counsel Is Not A Cure All; It Does Not Overcome An Actual Conflict Of Interest, Stephanie Kenn
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right to assistance of counsel. With this right comes many nuances, including the right of an individual to obtain counsel of his or her choice in civil matters if they choose to engage in such matters. The lawyer-client relationship is a fiduciary one and it carries many responsibilities on the attorney’s part. For example, a lawyer must provide “undivided loyalty” to his or her clients. This means that a lawyer must be aware of any conflicts of interest that may arise in the ordinary course of business. Lawyers must take the …
Evidentiary Support Needed For Successful Proof Of Claim Against Affiliated Debtors, Madeline Mallo
Evidentiary Support Needed For Successful Proof Of Claim Against Affiliated Debtors, Madeline Mallo
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
According to title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code) and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), a debtor must file schedules of the debtor’s assets and liabilities. A debtor’s schedules would include a list of all known claims against the debtor and list the claims as disputed, contingent or unliquidated.
If an entity believes they have a claim against the debtor that the debtor has not included on a schedule, or the claim is disputed, contingent, or unliquidated, that party can file a proof of claim. A proof of claim in a bankruptcy …
Stop Right There! Assessing The Role Of Collateral Estoppel In A Fraud Proceeding Against A Debtor And A Debtor-Owned Business, Brandon Dorman
Stop Right There! Assessing The Role Of Collateral Estoppel In A Fraud Proceeding Against A Debtor And A Debtor-Owned Business, Brandon Dorman
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
In an adversary proceeding, under section 523(a)(2)(A) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), to determine the non-dischargeability of a debt based upon fraud, a state courts finding of fraud against a debtor-owned business may collaterally estop the debtor in the adversary proceeding from relitigating the issue of fraud. Essential to this issue is the timing at which the debtor filed for bankruptcy. Timing is critical in determining whether the prior decision against the debtor-owned business in the state court action collaterally estopped the litigation against the debtor or whether the debtor was afforded the …
Adversary Proceeding Not Required For Bankruptcy Courts To Determine Lien Status, Justin Korenblatt
Adversary Proceeding Not Required For Bankruptcy Courts To Determine Lien Status, Justin Korenblatt
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AMH Roman Two NC, LLC, the Fourth Circuit denied Wells Fargo’s motion to set aside an order canceling its mortgage because the motion was not timely. In 2002, Wells Fargo extended a mortgage to the debtors on a property in Pendleton, North Carolina. Two years later, debtors refinanced the property with PNC Bank. Although PNC fully repaid Wells Fargo’s loan, Wells Fargo allowed the debtors’ line of credit to remain open, and permitted the debtors to take advances totaling over $300,000. Then, in 2012, debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter …
Under What Circumstances Can A Bankruptcy Court Grant Innocent Spouse Relief To A Debtor?, Noreen Gilroy
Under What Circumstances Can A Bankruptcy Court Grant Innocent Spouse Relief To A Debtor?, Noreen Gilroy
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The United States tax system allows married couples to file joint tax returns. For those married couples that jointly file, there is joint and severable liability for the taxes due on those returns. Because spouses who file joint tax returns are held both jointly and severally liable for those joint returns, the drafters of the Tax Code created an exemption from liability for innocent spouses in Section 6015 of the Tax Code. Section 6015(e) of the Tax Code expressly grants subject matter jurisdiction to the Tax Courts to review determinations of innocent spouse relief. However, the language of Section …
Uncertainty In The Gap Period: The Dangers Of Doing Business With An Alleged Debtor, Daniel Ishoo
Uncertainty In The Gap Period: The Dangers Of Doing Business With An Alleged Debtor, Daniel Ishoo
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Section 303 of the Bankruptcy Code allows creditors to initiate an involuntary case against a debtor by filing a petition with the court. Although the provisions applied to an involuntary case and a voluntary case are largely the same, one major difference surfaces in an involuntary case—the existence of what is commonly referred to as the “gap period.” The gap period is the period between the filing of an involuntary petition and a Judge’s entry of an order for relief.
Pursuant to § 303(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor may continue to operate during the gap period as …
Protecting Valuable Estate Interests Through The Unenforceability Of Ipso Facto Clauses, Kayla Martin
Protecting Valuable Estate Interests Through The Unenforceability Of Ipso Facto Clauses, Kayla Martin
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
A trustee or debtor-in-possession is provided with a plethora of powers under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). A chapter 13 debtor-in-possession, pursuant to section 1322 of the Bankruptcy Code, may assume or reject any executory contract in connection with its plan. The ability, however, to assume or reject an executory contract is limited by section 365, which in part prohibits the modification or termination of a debtor’s interest in a contractual agreement on the sole basis that the debtor filed for bankruptcy, which is commonly known as an ipso facto provision. This prohibition of …
Successful Motions For Reconsideration Require Extraordinary Circumstances, Maria A. Gomez
Successful Motions For Reconsideration Require Extraordinary Circumstances, Maria A. Gomez
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Motions for reconsideration are not recognized under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Rule(s)”) or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rule(s)”). A party seeking reconsideration of an order in the bankruptcy courts can file either: (1) a motion to alter or amend a judgment under Bankruptcy Rule 9023, if the order is interlocutory; or (2) a motion for relief from judgment under Bankruptcy Rule 9024, if the order is a final one. The applicable rules to motions for reconsideration are different depending on whether the motion is for an interlocutory or final order. There are …
Application Of The Federal Rule Of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 2004 Balancing Test, Patrick O’Connor
Application Of The Federal Rule Of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 2004 Balancing Test, Patrick O’Connor
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 (“Rule 2004”) provides that “[o]n motion of any party in interest, the court may order the examination of any entity.” By its terms, the rule is broad. It is only marginally narrowed by Rule 2004(b) to require that examinations “relate only to the acts, conduct, or property or to the liabilities and financial condition of the debtor, or to any matter which may affect the administration of the debtor's estate, or to the debtor's right to a discharge.” Given that Rule 2004 is broadly available in bankruptcy cases to “any party in interest” …
The Insolvency Effect On Attorney-Client Privilege, Anna Piszczatowski
The Insolvency Effect On Attorney-Client Privilege, Anna Piszczatowski
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
“The attorney-client privilege is the oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to the common law.” This privilege has been held as sacred and essential to encourage complete and candid communication between attorneys and their clients. In fact, if the attorney’s “professional mission” is to be carried out appropriately to the fullest extent, then the attorney must be able to acquire all the information necessary to represent his client. Therefore, the privilege allows unfettered communication, for the benefit of both parties.
By carving more exceptions to the privilege, as bankruptcy courts, and even the Supreme Court, have in …
Contractual Provider Agreement Provides For Permissible Government Recoupment, Emily Santoro
Contractual Provider Agreement Provides For Permissible Government Recoupment, Emily Santoro
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
A debtor healthcare provider without significant resources is unlikely to survive any prolonged disagreement with private or government payors. This challenge may be exacerbated by a debtors’ bankruptcy filing if a payor may refuses to make certain payments owed to the debtor. Therefore, whether a payors’ withholding of funds owed to a debtor hospital is considered an impermissible setoff or a permissible equitable recoupment is crucial.
This memorandum will explore whether a Medicaid/Medicare payor can withhold payments owed to a debtor, or whether such withholding violates the automatic stay. Part A will discuss withholding in healthcare bankruptcy scenarios generally. …
Fraudulent Transfer Provision Of The Bankruptcy Code Defined More Narrowly Than Similar Provisions In Other Statutes, Yaakov Seff
Fraudulent Transfer Provision Of The Bankruptcy Code Defined More Narrowly Than Similar Provisions In Other Statutes, Yaakov Seff
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The fraudulent conveyance provision of the Bankruptcy Code, (“the Code”), Section 548, is an “elemental and ancient provision of debtor-creditor relations.” It provides that “[t]he trustee may avoid any transfer ... of an interest of the debtor in property ... that was made ... within two years before the date of the filing of the petition . . .” where the transfer involved actual or constructive fraud.
But the ability to avoid fraudulent transfers is not limited to the bankruptcy context; parallel provisions are found in several areas of the federal legislation. For instance, there is a fraudulent transfer …
Although A Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Generally Precludes A Foreign Plaintiff From Recovering A Debtor’S Assets In A Civil Rico Claim, That Presumption Can Be Overcome To Hold A Foreign Defendant Liable For A Preference Claim, Amanda M. Schaefer
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
The civil portion of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) permits any individual “injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of the statute’s criminal provisions” to pursue a cause of action against a tort feasor. For a party to pursue a civil remedy for economic injury under the civil portion of the statute, its criminal portion must first be violated through illegal activity, such as numerous acts of mail and wire fraud. In RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community (“RJR Nabisco”), the Supreme Court held that RICO’s private right of action under …
More Than Fraud: Proving Fraud On The Court, Stephen Van Doran
More Than Fraud: Proving Fraud On The Court, Stephen Van Doran
Bankruptcy Research Library
(Excerpt)
In all adversarial proceedings, litigants have a duty of full disclosure and honesty with the court. Typically, where a party obtains a judgment through fraudulent conduct, the only way to overturn that judgment is through a motion to vacate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3).
A final judgment can also be overturned by a motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3), as incorporated into the Bankruptcy Rules by Rule 9024, to vacate a judgment based upon fraud on the court. Fraud on the court is generally limited to instances where “the integrity of the judicial …
Watch Or Report? Livestream Or Help? Good Samaritan Laws Revisited: The Need To Create A Duty To Report, Patricia G. Montana
Watch Or Report? Livestream Or Help? Good Samaritan Laws Revisited: The Need To Create A Duty To Report, Patricia G. Montana
Faculty Publications
In July 2017, a group of five Florida teenagers taunted a drowning disabled man while filming his death on a cell phone. In the video, the teenagers laughed and shouted harsh statements like "ain’t nobody finna to help you, you dumb bitch." At the moment the man’s head sank under the water for the very last time, one of the teenagers remarked: "Oh, he just died" before laughter ensued. None of the teenagers helped the man, nor did any of them report the drowning or his death to the authorities.
Because the Good Samaritan law in Florida, like in most …
Validation And Verification Vignettes: More Results From An Empirical Study Of Consumer Understanding Of Debt Collection Validation Notices, Jeff Sovern, Kate E. Walton, Nathan Frishberg
Validation And Verification Vignettes: More Results From An Empirical Study Of Consumer Understanding Of Debt Collection Validation Notices, Jeff Sovern, Kate E. Walton, Nathan Frishberg
Faculty Publications
The Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act obliges debt collectors to provide certain notices to consumers from whom they are attempting to collect debts. This Article is our second to report findings from the first academic study of consumer understanding of one of those notices, commonly called the validation notice. We showed consumers different versions of collection letters and then asked questions to measure their understanding of the notices.
This Article explores some issues not discussed in our first Article. For example, in this Article, we examine what consumers thought collectors would have to do in response to a request …
Brand Renegades Redux, Jeremy N. Sheff
Brand Renegades Redux, Jeremy N. Sheff
Faculty Publications
In "Brand Renegades," 1 NYU J. Intell. Prop. & Ent. L. 128 (2011), I identified a new frontier in trademark enforcement: consumers who use branded products out of affiliation with some aspects of the image cultivated by the brand owner, but whose conspicuous consumption of the brand generates social meanings that are inconsistent with that image. As far-right political movements have built momentum in the consumer economies of the West, this type of "brand renegade" consumption has taken a much darker turn. Over the past two years, neo-Nazis and white supremacists have conspicuously adopted well-known brands in their bids to …
Objections To Treaty Reservations: A Comparative Approach To Decentralized Interpretation, Tom Ginsburg
Objections To Treaty Reservations: A Comparative Approach To Decentralized Interpretation, Tom Ginsburg
Book Sections
No abstract provided.
Sexual Harassment And Corporate Law, Daniel Hemel, Dorothy Shapiro Lund
Sexual Harassment And Corporate Law, Daniel Hemel, Dorothy Shapiro Lund
Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
The year 2017 marked an inflection point in the evolution of social norms regarding sexual harassment. While victims of workplace harassment had long suffered in silence, the surfacing of serious sexual misconduct allegations against Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein encouraged many more victims to tell their personal stories of abuse. These scandals have spread beyond Hollywood to the rest of corporate America, leading to the departures of several high-profile executives as well as sharp stock price declines at a number of firms. In the past year, shareholders at four publicly traded companies have filed lawsuits alleging that corporate directors and officers …
The Bankruptcy Partition, Douglas G. Baird, Anthony Casey, Randal C. Picker
The Bankruptcy Partition, Douglas G. Baird, Anthony Casey, Randal C. Picker
Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
Many current bankruptcy debates—from critical vendor orders to the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corporation—begin with bankruptcy’s distributional rules and questions about how much discretion a judge should have in applying them. It is a mistake, however, to focus on distributional questions without first identifying the bankruptcy partition and ensuring it is properly policed. What appear to be distributional disputes are more often debates about the demarcation of the bankruptcy partition and the best way to police it.
Once the dynamics of establishing and policing the bankruptcy partition are taken into account, there is little …
Collective Bargaining Rights And Police Misconduct: Evidence From Florida, Dhammika Dharmapala, Richard H. Mcadams, John Rappaport
Collective Bargaining Rights And Police Misconduct: Evidence From Florida, Dhammika Dharmapala, Richard H. Mcadams, John Rappaport
Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
No abstract provided.