Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Travel Ban Update: Ninth Circuit Holds Eo-3 Exceeds President’S Power, Peter Margulies
Travel Ban Update: Ninth Circuit Holds Eo-3 Exceeds President’S Power, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Travel Ban Update: Without Addressing The Merits, The Supreme Court Stays Injunction Pending Further Proceedings, Peter Margulies
Travel Ban Update: Without Addressing The Merits, The Supreme Court Stays Injunction Pending Further Proceedings, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Refugee Eo Update: The Supreme Court Hands Each Side A Partial Victory, Peter Margulies
Refugee Eo Update: The Supreme Court Hands Each Side A Partial Victory, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Refugee Eo: Hawaii’S Response To The Government’S Request For A Stay, Peter Margulies
Refugee Eo: Hawaii’S Response To The Government’S Request For A Stay, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Hawaii Judge Watson Declines To Clarify Scope Of Preliminary Injunction On Executive Order 13,780, Peter Margulies
Hawaii Judge Watson Declines To Clarify Scope Of Preliminary Injunction On Executive Order 13,780, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Implementing The Refugee Eo: Add Grandparents, Peter Margulies
Implementing The Refugee Eo: Add Grandparents, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Travel Ban In The Supreme Court: Crafting A Workable Remedy, Peter Margulies
The Travel Ban In The Supreme Court: Crafting A Workable Remedy, Peter Margulies
Law Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Should The President’S Words Matter In Court?, Katherine A. Shaw
Should The President’S Words Matter In Court?, Katherine A. Shaw
Online Publications
The most striking aspect of last Thursday’s opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which rejected the Trump administration’s latest effort to revive its travel ban for individuals from six predominantly Muslim countries, was its reliance on Donald Trump’s own words as candidate, president-elect and president. The court leaned particularly heavily on his now-famous campaign statement that he was “calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”