Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0816: Ohio Valley Energy Systems V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0816: Ohio Valley Energy Systems V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2009-46
Appeal No. 0796: Ava Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0796: Ava Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-04
Appeal No. 0812: City Of Munroe Falls, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And D & L Energy, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0812: City Of Munroe Falls, Ohio V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And D & L Energy, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Decision Granting Permit (D&L Energy, Inc.)
Appeal No. 0800: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0800: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-55
Appeal No. 0811: Lawrence & Shalynew Fox V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0811: Lawrence & Shalynew Fox V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-91 (Everflow Eastern Partners, L.P.)
Appeal No. 0810: Maverick Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0810: Maverick Oil & Gas, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-88
Appeal No. 0798: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0798: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2008-42 and 2008-43
Appeal No. 0801: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0801: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-56, 2008-57 & 2008-58
Appeal No. 0802: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0802: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-56, 2008-57 & 2008-58
Appeal No. 0803: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0803: Edward H. Everett Co. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-56, 2008-57 & 2008-58
Appeal No. 0799: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0799: Adams Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2008-42 and 2008-43
Appeal No. 0808: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0808: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0805: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0805: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0807: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0807: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0809: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0809: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
Appeal No. 0806: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0806: Beck Energy Corp. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2008-74, 2008-75, 2008-81, 2008-82 & 2008-83
The Constitutionality Of Breed Discriminatory Legislation: A Summary, Joan E. Schaffner
The Constitutionality Of Breed Discriminatory Legislation: A Summary, Joan E. Schaffner
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This chapter focuses on Toledo v. Tellings, an Ohio case dealing with breed-specific legislation that restricted a Toledo resident to owning one “vicious” dog, defined purely by breed as a pit bull. This case implicated numerous constitutional issues, including vagueness, procedural due process, equal protection, substantive due process, takings, and privileges and immunities. Although the Ohio Sixth Appellate District struck down the breed-specific legislation, the Ohio Supreme Court reversed, and I find this reversal at odds with the constitutional issues at play.
Can You Hear Me Up There? Giving Voice To Local Communities Imperative For Achieving Sustainability, Patricia E. Salkin
Can You Hear Me Up There? Giving Voice To Local Communities Imperative For Achieving Sustainability, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
Sustainable development is an international challenge that demands attention at all levels of government. The calls to action to achieve sustainability have varied over the last few decades. For example, in the 1970s and 1980s attention was focused on the need for environmental review and growth management strategies. In the 1990s the rhetoric shifted to smart growth and livable communities, and today, the issue has been reframed as advocates view sustainability through the lens of global warming and climate change. Regardless of the nomenclature, however, the end game is the same. While the United States as a whole speaks through …
2009 Ethical Considerations In Land Use, Patricia E. Salkin
2009 Ethical Considerations In Land Use, Patricia E. Salkin
Scholarly Works
This article is one in a series of annual updates on reported cases and opinions in the area of ethics and land use regulation, A number of themes emerged from the round of litigation in the last year. The most surprising discovery was for a second year in a row, the number of reported cases involving allegations of unethical conduct on the part of land use attorneys. This article reviews these cases, as well as cases involving conflicts based on community involvement, familial relationships, employment and financial interests; and cases involving allegations of bias and prejudgment.