Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1729)
- Criminal Law (1136)
- International Law (1016)
- Intellectual Property Law (1014)
- Business Organizations Law (943)
-
- Health Law and Policy (939)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (932)
- Law and Economics (836)
- Environmental Law (717)
- Banking and Finance Law (714)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (675)
- Law and Society (664)
- Courts (628)
- Criminal Procedure (622)
- Legal Education (615)
- Law and Gender (599)
- Other Law (580)
- Law and Race (578)
- Securities Law (536)
- Contracts (494)
- Administrative Law (492)
- Family Law (490)
- Law and Politics (480)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (475)
- Legal History (467)
- Tax Law (438)
- Legal Profession (431)
- Labor and Employment Law (422)
- Torts (420)
- Institution
-
- Columbia Law School (3751)
- Duke Law (3419)
- Boston University School of Law (2710)
- Brooklyn Law School (1469)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1383)
-
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1263)
- Fordham Law School (1223)
- UC Law SF (944)
- University of New Mexico (885)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (494)
- California Western School of Law (368)
- Western New England University School of Law (313)
- Nova Southeastern University (289)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (281)
- Barry University School of Law (243)
- Brigham Young University Law School (182)
- University of Louisville (44)
- University of San Diego (22)
- Lindenwood University (2)
- Colby College (1)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (422)
- SSRN (400)
- Columbia Law Review (260)
- Law (247)
- International law (233)
-
- Intellectual property (210)
- Supreme Court (192)
- Copyright (191)
- Corporate governance (190)
- Criminal law (190)
- Civil rights (187)
- Race (181)
- Privacy (173)
- United States (170)
- Legal education (164)
- Courts (162)
- Human rights (158)
- Discrimination (157)
- Constitution (144)
- Climate change (135)
- Regulation (127)
- Administrative law (125)
- Contracts (125)
- Judicial review (119)
- Jurisprudence (114)
- Empirical (113)
- First Amendment (113)
- Federalism (111)
- Federal government (110)
- Copyright law (108)
- Publication Year
- File Type
Articles 271 - 300 of 19286
Full-Text Articles in Law
Three Modalities Of (Originalist) Fiduciary Constitutionalism, Ethan J. Leib
Three Modalities Of (Originalist) Fiduciary Constitutionalism, Ethan J. Leib
Faculty Scholarship
There is an ongoing body of scholarship in contemporary constitutional theory and legal history that can be labeled “fiduciary constitutionalism.” Some have wanted to strangle this work in its cradle, offering an argument pitched “against fiduciary constitutionalism,” full stop. But because there are enough different modalities of fiduciary constitutionalism – and particularly originalist varieties of it at the center of recent critiques – it is worth getting clearer about some methodological commitments of this work to help evaluate its promise and potential pitfalls. This paper develops the ambitions, successes, and deficiencies of three modalities of historical and originalist argument that …
Anti-Carceral Human Rights Advocacy, Chi Adanna Mgbako, Nate Johnson, Vivienne Bang Brown, Megan Cheah, Kimya Zahedi
Anti-Carceral Human Rights Advocacy, Chi Adanna Mgbako, Nate Johnson, Vivienne Bang Brown, Megan Cheah, Kimya Zahedi
Faculty Scholarship
The theory of carceral abolition entered the mainstream during the 2020 global protests for Black lives. Abolition calls for divestment from carceral institutions like police and prisons in favor of the expansion of social and economic programs that ensure public safety and nurture community well-being. Although there is little scholarship explicitly linking abolition to international human rights, there are scholars and advocates who implicitly echo abolitionist theories by critiquing the international human rights regime's overreliance on criminal law. These critics argue that relying on carceral institutions to address impunity for human rights abuses and promote gender justice does little to …
Nondomination And The Ambitions Of Employment Law, Aditi Bagchi
Nondomination And The Ambitions Of Employment Law, Aditi Bagchi
Faculty Scholarship
There is something missing in existing discussions of domination. While republican theory and critical legal theory each have contributed significantly to our understanding of domination, their focus on structural relationships and group subordination can leave out of focus the individual wrongs that make up domination, each of which is an unjustified exercise of power by one person over another. Private law (supported by private law theory) plays an important role in filling out our pictures of domination and the role of the state in limiting it. Private law allows us to recognize domination in wrongs by one person against another, …
Unplugging Heartbeat Trades And Reforming The Taxation Of Etfs, Jeffrey M. Colon
Unplugging Heartbeat Trades And Reforming The Taxation Of Etfs, Jeffrey M. Colon
Faculty Scholarship
The much-touted tax efficiency of equity exchange traded funds (ETFs) has historically been built upon portfolios that track indices with low turnover and the tax exemption for in-kind distributions of appreciated property.
This rule permits ETFs to distribute appreciated shares tax-free to redeeming authorized participants (APs) and reduce a fund’s future capital gains. ETFs and APs, working together, exploit this rule in so-called heartbeat trades in which an ETF distributes shares of a specific company or companies to a redeeming AP, instead of a pro rata basket of the ETF’s portfolio. The distributed securities are appreciated shares of companies that …
Race-Ing Antitrust, I. Bennett Capers, Gregory Day
Race-Ing Antitrust, I. Bennett Capers, Gregory Day
Faculty Scholarship
Antitrust law has a race problem. To spot an antitrust violation, courts inquire into whether an act has degraded consumer welfare. Since anticompetitive practices are often assumed to enhance consumer welfare, antitrust offenses are rarely found. Key to this framework is that antitrust treats all consumers monolithically; that consumers are differently situated, especially along lines of race, simply is ignored.
We argue that antitrust law must disaggregate the term “consumer” to include those who disproportionately suffer from anticompetitive practices via a community welfare standard. As a starting point, we demonstrate that anticompetitive conduct has specifically been used as a tool …
Professor Samuel H. Pillsbury's Science Of Mind: A Tribute, Deborah W. Denno
Professor Samuel H. Pillsbury's Science Of Mind: A Tribute, Deborah W. Denno
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Victim Civil Litigation And The Elusive Goal Of Corporate Accountability, Howard M. Erichson
Victim Civil Litigation And The Elusive Goal Of Corporate Accountability, Howard M. Erichson
Faculty Scholarship
This article, written for the Clifford Symposium on Tort Law and Public Policy, examines the challenges of using victim civil litigation to hold corporations accountable for serious wrongdoing. First, it offers thoughts on defining the terms of victim civil litigation, corporate wrongdoing, and corporate accountability. Next, taking seriously the distinction between accountability grounded in punishing the wrongdoer and accountability grounded in providing redress to victims, it considers four major hurdles and how they interfere with each kind of accountability. It calls these hurdles the information asymmetry problem, the collective action problem, the Whac-a-Mole problem, and the agency problem. Using the …
Patent's New Salience, Janet Freilich
Patent's New Salience, Janet Freilich
Faculty Scholarship
The vast majority of patents do not matter. They are almost never enforced or licensed and, in consequence, are almost always ignored. This is a well-accepted feature of the patent system and has a tremendous impact on patent policy. In particular, while there are many aspects of patent law that are potentially troubling—including grants of unmerited patents, high transaction costs in obtaining necessary patent licenses, and patents’ potential to block innovation and hinder economic growth—these problems may be insignificant in practice because patents are under-enforced and routinely infringed without consequence.
This Article argues that technological developments are greatly increasing the …
Conflict, Consistency And The Role Of Conventional Morality In Judicial Decision-Making, Aditi Bagchi
Conflict, Consistency And The Role Of Conventional Morality In Judicial Decision-Making, Aditi Bagchi
Faculty Scholarship
Cardozo defends a pragmatic approach to judicial decision-making. Judges should apply and develop legal rules with an eye toward their social function. “Public policy” at this stage of decision-making theoretically could be rooted in a social scientific exercise or some other direct attempt to come up with the optimal rule.
Cardozo instead directs judges to conventional morality. Conventional morality is an unlikely solution given the specter of inconsistency that it raises. But in the disagreement and conflict about conventional morality that seem to render it unstable lie the resources for self-correction over time. Judicial decision-making is inevitably inconsistent to some …
Benjamin Cardozo And American Natural Law Theory, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Benjamin Cardozo And American Natural Law Theory, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Visiting Judges, Pamela K. Bookman, Alyssa S. King
Visiting Judges, Pamela K. Bookman, Alyssa S. King
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Fiduciary Theory Of Progressive Prosecution, Bruce A. Green, Rebecca Roiphe
A Fiduciary Theory Of Progressive Prosecution, Bruce A. Green, Rebecca Roiphe
Faculty Scholarship
Progressive prosecutors differ from their more traditional counterparts primarily in the way in which they make decisions. They tend to bind their discretion by announcing categorical policies rather than making fact-based decisions case by case. This Article catalogs the unusual degree of pushback progressive prosecutors have encountered from the public, legislatures, courts, police, and their own subordinate prosecutors. Drawing on fiduciary theory, it explains this reaction as a response to progressive prosecutors’ abdication of their fiduciary role. As a public fiduciary, prosecutors are entrusted with protecting the public’s abstract interest in justice, and an integral part of this role is …
Second Amendment Sanctuaries: Defiance, Discretion, And Race, Nicholas J. Johnson
Second Amendment Sanctuaries: Defiance, Discretion, And Race, Nicholas J. Johnson
Faculty Scholarship
Second Amendment Sanctuaries deploy nonenforcement policies and strategies in defiance of firearms laws of superior jurisdictions. The scholarship so far has focused on whether Second Amendment Sanctuary policies are legally enforceable. This Article advances the scholarship beyond questions of de jure validity by examining the potential for practical, de facto efficacy of Second Amendment Sanctuary policies. This Article concludes that even where Second Amendment Sanctuaries have weak claims to formal validity, defiant public officials still have broad opportunities to implement Second Amendment Sanctuary policies through the exercise of enforcement discretion. The conclusion that enforcement discretion can effectuate sanctuary policies is …
Unfair Competition Under The Usmca: The Case Of Migrant Workers On Us Farms, Jennifer Gordon
Unfair Competition Under The Usmca: The Case Of Migrant Workers On Us Farms, Jennifer Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Congressional Power, Public Rights, And Non-Article Iii Adjudication, John M. Golden, Thomas Lee
Congressional Power, Public Rights, And Non-Article Iii Adjudication, John M. Golden, Thomas Lee
Faculty Scholarship
When can Congress vest in administrative agencies or other non–Article III federal courts the power to adjudicate any of the nine types of “Cases” or “Controversies” listed in Article III of the United States Constitution? The core doctrine holds that Congress may employ non–Article III adjudicators in territorial courts, in military courts, and for decision of matters of public right. Scholars have criticized this so-called “public rights” doctrine as incoherent but have struggled to offer a more cogent answer.
This Article provides a new, overarching explanation of when and why Congress may use non–Article III federal officials to adjudicate matters …
Theorizing Corroboration, Maggie Wittlin
Theorizing Corroboration, Maggie Wittlin
Faculty Scholarship
A child makes an out-of-court statement accusing an adult of abuse. That statement is important proof, but it also presents serious reliability concerns. When deciding whether it is sufficiently reliable to be admitted, should a court consider whether the child’s statement is corroborated—whether, for example, there is medical evidence of abuse? More broadly, should courts consider corroboration when deciding whether evidence is reliable enough to be admitted at trial? Judges, rule-makers, and scholars have taken significantly divergent approaches to this question and come to different conclusions.
This Article argues that there is a key problem with using corroboration to evaluate …
Tax Benefits And Fairness In K–12 Education, Linda Sugin
Tax Benefits And Fairness In K–12 Education, Linda Sugin
Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the tax law’s subsidies for inequality and segregation in primary and secondary education, analyzing the federal charitable deduction and education savings plans, and state tax credits for education. It argues that the tax system diverts funds from traditional public education into private education, fostering economic, racial, religious, and political separation. The tax law also operates to increase resource inequality within public education by subsidizing schools that affluent children attend. In a novel analysis, the Article contends that the jurisprudence around the charitable deduction for education—though longstanding—is legally incoherent, and argues that no deduction should ever be allowed …
The Indecisions Of 1789: Inconstant Originalism And Strategic Ambiguity, Jed H. Shugerman
The Indecisions Of 1789: Inconstant Originalism And Strategic Ambiguity, Jed H. Shugerman
Faculty Scholarship
The unitary executive theory relies on the First Congress and an ostensible “Decision of 1789” as an originalist basis for unconditional presidential removal power. In light of new evidence, the First Congress was undecided on any constitutional theory and retreated to ambiguity in order to compromise and move on to other urgent business.
Seila Law’s strict separation-of-powers argument depends on indefeasibility (i.e., Congress may not set limits or conditions on the president’s power of civil removal). In fact, few members of the First Congress defended or even discussed indefeasibility. Only nine of fifty-four participating representatives explicitly endorsed the presidentialist view …
When Donor Meets Purpose, Atinuke O. Adediran
When Donor Meets Purpose, Atinuke O. Adediran
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay addresses a gap in law and the Restatement of the Law Charitable Nonproít Organizations regarding the relationship between a charitable nonproít’s donors and its purpose. I argue that charitable nonproíts can align their purposes with the personal or professional identities of their donors, and it may be in the best interest of some charities to do so. Charities whose purposes are to address racial or economic inequality should seriously consider aligning their donor identity with their purpose as a way of improving their legitimacy in the communities they serve, and to reach previously untapped sources of funding.
What’S “Controversial” About Esg? A Theory Of Compelled Commercial Speech Under The First Amendment, Sean J. Griffith
What’S “Controversial” About Esg? A Theory Of Compelled Commercial Speech Under The First Amendment, Sean J. Griffith
Faculty Scholarship
This Article uses the Securities and Exchange Commission’s SEC’s recent foray into Environmental, Social, and Governance ESG to illuminate ambiguities in First Amendment doctrine. Situating mandatory disclosure regulations within the compelled commercial speech paradigm, it identifies the doctrinal hinge as “controversy.” Rules compelling commercial speech receive deferential judicial review, provided they are purely factual and uncontroversial. The Article argues that this requirement operates as a pretext check, preventing regulators from exceeding the plausible limits of the consumer protection rationale.
Applied to securities regulation, the compelled commercial speech paradigm requires the SEC to justify disclosure mandates as a form of investor …
Hiding In Plain Sight: An Ilo Convention On Labor Standards In Global Supply Chains, James J. Brudney
Hiding In Plain Sight: An Ilo Convention On Labor Standards In Global Supply Chains, James J. Brudney
Faculty Scholarship
This Article proposes a solution to the primary challenge currently confronting governments, employers, and workers under international labor law: how to promote and protect decent labor conditions in global supply chains (GSCs).
The Article begins by summarizing why existing public law and private law approaches have failed to meet this challenge over several decades. It describes the shortcomings of law and practice in developing countries as well as the weakness of corporate social responsibility (CSR), including the most ambitious version of CSR, the U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. It then analyzes the problems with recent national laws …
Private Law And Public Discourse, Aditi Bagchi
Private Law And Public Discourse, Aditi Bagchi
Faculty Scholarship
Democracies need institutions that help to build public consensus on fundamental principles of justice. However, the major public institutions associated with this task – electoral institutions, the press, education, and civil society—each face a trade-off between a high degree of governmental control over their agendas, on the one hand, and self-segregation by participants, on the other. This Article identifies private law—the litigation of private claims and their judicial resolution—as an unlikely but ultimately critical site for building consensus on political principles. After laying out what public discourse requires (and what it does not), the Article argues that private law is …
Title Ix And "Menstruation Or Related Conditions", Marcy L. Karin, Naomi Cahn, Elizabeth B. Cooper, Bridget J. Crawford, Margaret E. Johnson, Emily Gold Waldman
Title Ix And "Menstruation Or Related Conditions", Marcy L. Karin, Naomi Cahn, Elizabeth B. Cooper, Bridget J. Crawford, Margaret E. Johnson, Emily Gold Waldman
Faculty Scholarship
Title IX protects against sex-based discrimination and harassment in covered education programs and activities. The Biden Administration's recently proposed Title IX regulations do not, however, include discrimination on the basis of menstruation or related conditions as a form of discrimination based on sex. This comment on the proposed regulations explains why the regulations should include conditions related to menstruation and recommends changes for how to do so.
Reflection, Deliberation, And Dialogue: Stipanowich's Contribution To Dispute Resolution, Jacqueline Nolan-Haley .
Reflection, Deliberation, And Dialogue: Stipanowich's Contribution To Dispute Resolution, Jacqueline Nolan-Haley .
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Family Law For The One-Hundred-Year Life, Naomi R. Cahn, Clare Huntington, Elizabeth Scott
Family Law For The One-Hundred-Year Life, Naomi R. Cahn, Clare Huntington, Elizabeth Scott
Faculty Scholarship
Family law is for young people. To facilitate child rearing and help spouses pool resources over a lifetime, the law obligates parents to minor children and spouses to each other. Family law’s presumption of young, financially interdependent, conjugal couples raising children privileges one family form—marriage—and centers the dependency needs of children.
This age myopia fundamentally fails older adults. Families are essential to flourishing in the last third of life, but the legal system offers neither the family forms many older adults want nor the support of family care older adults need. Racial and economic inequities, accumulated across lifetimes, exacerbate these …
Punishment Without The State, I. Bennett Capers
Punishment Without The State, I. Bennett Capers
Faculty Scholarship
People are speaking up on social media and in other virtual spaces, sometimes to spur the criminal process, sometimes in response to the criminal system’s perceived failures, and even sometimes completely indifferent to the criminal system. People are expressing moral condemnation. They are shaming, shunning, banishing, and canceling. What are the implications of punishment through virtual spaces, in lieu of the usual—and now seemingly antiquated—space of physical courtrooms? More broadly, when all the world can become a virtual courtroom, a “place” for judgment, what are the implications for how we think about crime itself? And perhaps most importantly, if social …
The New Pornography Wars, Julie A. Dahlstrom
The New Pornography Wars, Julie A. Dahlstrom
Faculty Scholarship
The world’s largest online pornography conglomerate, MindGeek, has come under fire for the publishing of “rape videos,” child pornography, and nonconsensual pornography on its website, Pornhub. As in the “pornography wars” of the 1970s and 1980s, lawyers and activists have now turned to civil remedies and filed creative anti-trafficking lawsuits against MindGeek and third parties, like payment processing company, Visa. These lawsuits seek not only to achieve legal accountability for online sex trafficking but also to reframe a broader array of online harms as sex trafficking.
This Article explores what these new trafficking lawsuits mean for the future regulation of …
There's No Such Thing As Independent Creation, And It's A Good Thing, Too, Christopher Buccafusco
There's No Such Thing As Independent Creation, And It's A Good Thing, Too, Christopher Buccafusco
Faculty Scholarship
Independent creation is the foundation of U.S. copyright law. A work is only original and, thus, copyrightable to the extent that it is independently created by its author and not copied from another source. And a work can be deemed infringing only if it is not independently created. Moreover, independent creation provides the grounding for all major theoretical justifications for copyright law. Unfortunately, the doctrine cannot bear the substantial weight that has been foisted upon it. This Article argues that copyright law’s independent creation doctrine rests on a set of discarded psychological assumptions about memory, copying, and creativity. When those …
The Price Of Fairness, Christopher Buccafusco, Daniel Hemel, Eric Talley
The Price Of Fairness, Christopher Buccafusco, Daniel Hemel, Eric Talley
Faculty Scholarship
The COVID-19 pandemic led to acute supply shortages across the country as well as concerns over price increases amid surging demand. In the process, it reawakened a debate about whether and how to regulate “price gouging”—a controversy that continues as inflation has accelerated even as the pandemic abates. Animating this debate is a longstanding conflict between laissez-faire economics, which champions price fluctuations as a means to allocate scarce goods, and perceived norms of consumer fairness, which are thought to cut strongly against sharp price hikes amid shortages.
This Article provides a new, empirically grounded perspective on the price gouging debate …
Beyond Legal Deserts: Access To Counsel For Immigrants Facing Removal, Emily Ryo, Reed Humphrey
Beyond Legal Deserts: Access To Counsel For Immigrants Facing Removal, Emily Ryo, Reed Humphrey
Faculty Scholarship
Removal proceedings are high-stakes adversarial proceedings in which immigration judges must decide whether to allow immigrants who allegedly have violated U.S. immigration laws to stay in the United States or to order them deported to their countries of origin. In these proceedings, the government trial attorneys prosecute noncitizens who often lack English fluency, economic resources, and familiarity with our legal system. Yet, most immigrants in removal proceedings do not have legal representation, as removal is considered to be a civil matter and courts have not recognized a right to governmentappointed counsel for immigrants facing removal. Advocates, policymakers, and scholars have …