Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Company shareholder (2)
- Wake Forest Law Review (2)
- American Law Institute (1)
- Business judgment rule (1)
- Control trigger (1)
-
- Corporate law (1)
- Corporate policy (1)
- Corporation law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Fiduciary duty (1)
- Friendly transaction (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Hostile takeover (1)
- Inter se (1)
- Just say no defense (1)
- Legal justification (1)
- Management entrenchment (1)
- Merger of equals (1)
- Minority business (1)
- Minority business set-asides (1)
- Minority enterprises (1)
- Minority firms (1)
- Model penal code (1)
- Non discrimination obligations (1)
- Paternalistic justification (1)
- Racial discrimination in business transactions (1)
- Reasonable expectations (1)
- Shareholder oppression (1)
- Social justification (1)
- Takeover litigation (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rethinking Minority Business Development Strategies, Robert E. Suggs
Rethinking Minority Business Development Strategies, Robert E. Suggs
Faculty Scholarship
Minority business set-asides were created as a prophylactic measure to redress discrimination against minority owned business firms. Predominantly minority jurisdictions found them especially attractive because they promised to provide minority firms a share of the procurement dollars expended by these jurisdictions. The Croson decision invalidated Richmond’s ordinance and posed substantial barriers to further enactments. This article proposes an alternative to such set-aides. It argues that the proposed alternative, an Equal Opportunity Rating Agency (EORA), provides a superior business development policy tool and does not have the constitutional vulnerabilities of set-asides. An EORA would operate much like a credit rating agency, …
Why Not Good Faith?-The Foibles Of Fairness In Closely Held Corporations, Daniel S. Kleinberger
Why Not Good Faith?-The Foibles Of Fairness In Closely Held Corporations, Daniel S. Kleinberger
Faculty Scholarship
This essay describes the contours of the shareholder’s duty to be fair and explores some of the problems caused by the law’s imprecision in defining the duty of fairness. Because this duty is best understood as a rejection of old norms, part one of this essay describes the traditional doctrines of intra-corporate responsibility. Part two describes the special characteristics of a close corporation and outlines how those characteristics pushed close corporation law to new concepts of fairness and shareholder duties. Part three attempts to delineate those duties of fairness and also to highlight some of the dangers that arise when …
It Does The Crime But Not The Time: Corporate Criminal Liability In Federal Law, Michael E. Tigar
It Does The Crime But Not The Time: Corporate Criminal Liability In Federal Law, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Just Say No To Whom?, Ronald J. Gilson
Just Say No To Whom?, Ronald J. Gilson
Faculty Scholarship
"Just say no" is the current rallying cry of those seeking to give target management the unrestricted power to block hostile tender offers. Not surprisingly, the turn of phrase chosen by management leaves ambiguous the precise issue on which the debate should turn: To whom does management want the power to say no? As target management poses the issue, it wants to say no to a raider. The image is of stalwart management protecting shareholders against a marauding outsider. However, that image is seriously misleading. In fact, target management seeks the power to say no to its own shareholders.
The …
What Triggers Revlon?, Ronald J. Gilson, Reinier Kraakman
What Triggers Revlon?, Ronald J. Gilson, Reinier Kraakman
Faculty Scholarship
Delaware's new approach to takeover law is announced in three cases that address different aspects of management's role in the standard drama of defending against a hostile takeover. Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co. scripts a main act for the drama by prescribing a duty to compare the outsider's offer with the universe of other options and, if necessary, to resist the outsider within the guidelines fixed by the proportionality test. Moran v. Household International, Inc. writes a prologue by encouraging management to plan a vigorous defense that can thwart a coercive offer without damaging the company. Finally, Revlon …