Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Judicial opinions (2)
- Authority (1)
- Authorization for Use of Military Force (1)
- Confict of laws (1)
- Conflict of laws (1)
-
- Courts (1)
- Election law (1)
- Equality before the law (1)
- Executive power (1)
- Federal government (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Friedrich Carl von Savigny (1)
- Globalization (1)
- International Court of Justice (1)
- International courts (1)
- International law (1)
- Judges--Selection and appointment (1)
- Judgments (1)
- Jurisdiction (International law) (1)
- Presidents (1)
- Racism (1)
- Richard A. Posner (1)
- Richard H. Hasen (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Terrorism (1)
- Treaties (1)
- United States (1)
- United States. Congress (1)
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Making Federalism Doctrine: Fidelity, Institutional Competence, And Compensating Adjustments, Ernest A. Young
Making Federalism Doctrine: Fidelity, Institutional Competence, And Compensating Adjustments, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Judging The Law Of Politics, Guy-Uriel Charles
Judging The Law Of Politics, Guy-Uriel Charles
Faculty Scholarship
In this Review Essay I explore the rights-structure debate that has captivated the attention of election law scholars. The Essay juxtaposes the recent work of a leading individualist Professor Richard Hasen's new book, "The Supreme Court and Election Law," against the recent work of a leading structuralist, Professor Richard Pildes' recent Foreword to the Harvard Law Review. I argue that even though the rights-structure debate produces much heat, it does not significantly advance the goal of understanding and evaluating the role of the Court in democratic politics. I aim to return election law to a dualistic understanding of the relationship …
2003-2004 Supreme Court Update, Erwin Chemerinsky
2003-2004 Supreme Court Update, Erwin Chemerinsky
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Globalizing Savigny: The State In Savigny’S Private International Law, And The Challenge Of Europeanization And Globalization, Ralf Michaels
Globalizing Savigny: The State In Savigny’S Private International Law, And The Challenge Of Europeanization And Globalization, Ralf Michaels
Faculty Scholarship
How can conflict of laws respond to the challenges from globalization? Some argue that state-based approaches like governmental interest analysis are inadequate, and advocate a return to the approach taken by the German scholar Savigny in the 19th century. The article shows that the assumption is correct: state-based approaches have indeed become problematic. However, a return to Savigny's approach will not help: While Savigny's approach is multilateral and pays little regard to governmental interest, closer analysis reveals how central the state is to his theory. The consequences are shown in an analysis of a recent European case. It follows that …
Judicial Triage: Reflections On The Debate Over Unpublished Opinions, Mitu Gulati, David C. Vladeck
Judicial Triage: Reflections On The Debate Over Unpublished Opinions, Mitu Gulati, David C. Vladeck
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Mr. Justice Posner? Unpacking The Statistics, Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati
Mr. Justice Posner? Unpacking The Statistics, Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Colored Speech: Cross Burnings, Epistemics, And The Triumph Of The Crits?, Guy-Uriel Charles
Colored Speech: Cross Burnings, Epistemics, And The Triumph Of The Crits?, Guy-Uriel Charles
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay examines the Court's recent decision in Virginia v. Black. It argues that Black signifies a different approach to the constitutionality of statutes regulating cross burnings. It shows how the Court's conservatives have essentially accepted the intellectual framework and the mode of analysis suggested previously by the critical race theorists. In particular, this Essay explores the role that Justice Thomas plays in the case. The Essay explains Justice Thomas's active participation as a matter of epistemic authority and epistemic deference.
Congressional Authorization And The War On Terrorism, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Congressional Authorization And The War On Terrorism, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
Faculty Scholarship
This Article presents a framework for interpreting Congress's September 18, 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), the central statutory enactment related to the war on terrorism. Although both constitutional theory and constitutional practice suggest that the validity of presidential wartime actions depends to a significant degree on their relationship to congressional authorization, the meaning and implications of the AUMF have received little attention in the academic debates over the war on terrorism. The framework presented in this Article builds on the analysis in the Supreme Court's plurality opinion in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, which devoted significant attention to the …
Medellin V. Dretke: Federalism And International Law, Curtis A. Bradley, Lori Fisler Damrosch, Martin Flaherty
Medellin V. Dretke: Federalism And International Law, Curtis A. Bradley, Lori Fisler Damrosch, Martin Flaherty
Faculty Scholarship
This is an edited version of a debate held at Columbia Law School on February 21, 2005.
Terrorism: The Politics Of Prosecution, Madeline Morris
Terrorism: The Politics Of Prosecution, Madeline Morris
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Foreign Law And The Denominator Problem, Ernest A. Young
Foreign Law And The Denominator Problem, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response To Professors Posner And Yoo, Laurence R. Helfer, Anne-Marie Slaughter
Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response To Professors Posner And Yoo, Laurence R. Helfer, Anne-Marie Slaughter
Faculty Scholarship
A recent article in the California Law Review by Professors Eric Posner and John Yoo, Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, argues that the only effective international tribunals are dependent tribunals, by which the authors mean ad hoc tribunals staffed by judges closely controlled by governments through the power of reappointment or threats of retaliation. Independent tribunals, by contrast, meaning tribunals staffed by judges appointed on similar terms as those in domestic courts, pose a danger to international cooperation. According to Posner and Yoo, independent tribunals are suspect because they are more likely to allow moral ideals, ideological imperatives or the …