Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Agencies (1)
- Agricultural Rural Development Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (1)
- Appellate Body (1)
- Authority (1)
- China Securities Regulatory Commission (1)
-
- Congress (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Exports (1)
- Food safety (1)
- General Agreement on Tarriffs and Trade (1)
- Imports (1)
- Inside information (1)
- Insider trading (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Liability (1)
- Misappropriation (1)
- Poultry (1)
- Poultry Products Inspection Act (1)
- Rulemaking (1)
- Stock exchanges (1)
- Trade protection (1)
- United States (1)
- WTO (1)
- World Trade Organization (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States--Certain Measures Affecting Imports Of Poultry From China: The Fascinating Case That Wasn't, Donald H. Regan
United States--Certain Measures Affecting Imports Of Poultry From China: The Fascinating Case That Wasn't, Donald H. Regan
Articles
US–Poultry (China) was the first Panel decision dealing with an origin-specific SPS measure, or with what the United States referred to as an ‘equivalence regime’. More specifically, it was the first instance in which the basis for the challenged measure was the claimed inability of the complainant country to enforce its own food-safety rules. Unfortunately, as the litigation developed, the very interesting novel issues raised by such a measure were not discussed. This essay discusses those novel issues – in particular, what sort of scientific justification or risk assessment should be required for a measure like this, and what SPS …
Enforcement Without Foundation? Insider Trading And China's Administrative Law Crisis, Nicholas C. Howson
Enforcement Without Foundation? Insider Trading And China's Administrative Law Crisis, Nicholas C. Howson
Articles
China's securities regulator enforces insider trading prohibitions pursuant to non-legal and non-regulatory internal "guidance." Reported agency decisions indicate that enforcement against insider trading is often possible only pursuant to this guidance, as the behavior identified is far outside of the scope of insider trading liability provided for in statute or regulation. I argue that the agency guidance is itself unlawful and unenforceable, because: (i) the guidance is not the regulatory norm required by the statutory delegation of power; and (ii) the guidance is ultra vires because (a) it addresses something substantively different from what is authorized under the statutory delegation, …