Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil procedure (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Class Action Fairness Act (1)
- Class actions (1)
- Courts (1)
-
- Empirical research (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Employment practice (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Fee-shifting (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Kansas (1)
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Racial harassment (1)
- Rule 68 (1)
- Rule revision (1)
- Sexual harassment (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Symposium Reflections: A Rulemaking Perspective, Edward H. Cooper
Symposium Reflections: A Rulemaking Perspective, Edward H. Cooper
Articles
These reflections seek to situate this most excellent Symposium in the rulemaking process. All contributors are working with an eye to that process. Their goal is to achieve a better understanding of how offer-ofjudgment rules actually work in practice. The major focus is on Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as it has affected practice in actions brought under fee-shifting statutes, but Professor Yoon's article adds insights into state practice in the very different world of automobile accident claims. There is no reason to attempt to summarize or synthesize the papers or discussions that stand so well …
Unwrapping Racial Harassment Law, Pat K. Chew
Unwrapping Racial Harassment Law, Pat K. Chew
Articles
This article is based on a pioneering empirical study of racial harassment in the workplace in which we statistically analyze federal court opinions from 1976 to 2002. Part I offers an overview of racial harassment law and research, noting its common origin with and its close dependence upon sexual harassment legal jurisprudence. In order to put the study's analysis in context, Part I describes the dispute resolution process from which racial harassment cases arise.
Parts II and III present a clear picture of how racial harassment law has played out in the courts - who are the plaintiffs and defendants, …
Rewriting Shutts For Fun, Not To Profit, Edward H. Cooper
Rewriting Shutts For Fun, Not To Profit, Edward H. Cooper
Articles
It has not been easy to reconcile contemporary class-action practice with traditional adversary procedure. For that matter, it is not easy to craft a unitary "class-action" procedure that serves well the many different purposes pursued by the many different species of class actions. The practice has flourished, but few would dare say it has really matured. Many problems remain.