Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (622)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (393)
- Courts (216)
- International Law (204)
- Banking and Finance Law (178)
-
- Securities Law (152)
- Intellectual Property Law (127)
- Judges (125)
- Law and Politics (117)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (114)
- Economics (108)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (108)
- Criminal Law (107)
- Military, War, and Peace (102)
- Law and Society (99)
- Legal History (99)
- Administrative Law (98)
- Business (98)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (93)
- Business Organizations Law (92)
- Political Science (90)
- Law and Economics (87)
- Jurisdiction (82)
- Supreme Court of the United States (71)
- Contracts (69)
- Jurisprudence (68)
- Torts (62)
- Legal Education (61)
- Health Law and Policy (57)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (192)
- United States (109)
- Federal government (97)
- Empirical (87)
- General (81)
-
- Law--Study and teaching (76)
- International law (69)
- Public debts (69)
- Courts (67)
- Debt relief (63)
- Supreme Court (61)
- Corporate governance (54)
- Judicial process (54)
- Race discrimination (54)
- Financial crises (52)
- Jurisdiction (49)
- Human rights (46)
- Law--Interpretation and construction (46)
- Treaties (45)
- Firearms--Law and legislation (42)
- Lawyers (42)
- Well-being (42)
- Corporation law (41)
- Civil rights (40)
- Constitution. 1st Amendment (40)
- Freedom of speech (40)
- Due process of law (38)
- Judicial review (38)
- Civil Rights (36)
- Civil procedure (35)
Articles 1 - 30 of 3839
Full-Text Articles in Law
Historical Analogy And The Role Morality Of Reason-Giving, Darrell A. H. Miller
Historical Analogy And The Role Morality Of Reason-Giving, Darrell A. H. Miller
Duke Law Journal Online
The Supreme Court has turned ever more to analogical reasoning from history and tradition to decide significant matters of public policy. Nowhere is this phenomenon more evident than in the Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen.
The Court’s crafting of a Second Amendment test that turns almost entirely on the strength of analogies—and on a topic of such intense public salience—has thrust analogical reasoning to the forefront of judicial and academic debate. While many have questioned the workability of Bruen’s focus on historical analogs, this Essay is less concerned about the pragmatics of …
Missing Pieces: Gaps In The Record Of Early American Decisional Law, Andrew Willinger
Missing Pieces: Gaps In The Record Of Early American Decisional Law, Andrew Willinger
Duke Law Journal Online
In its most recent major Second Amendment decision, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Supreme Court suggested that historical laws “rarely subject to judicial scrutiny” are not especially illuminating because “we do not know the basis of their perceived legality.” Legal scholars have defended Bruen’s approach to historical evidence in part by arguing that the decision requires merely an artificially-limited historical inquiry into internal legal sources to discern overarching principles accepted across the country in the Founding Era. But modern-day lawyers and judges actually know far less than they might believe about whether certain laws were …
"Just The Facts, Ma'am"? A Response To Professors Blocher And Garrett, Haley N. Proctor
"Just The Facts, Ma'am"? A Response To Professors Blocher And Garrett, Haley N. Proctor
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
The Precarious Art Of Classifying Facts, Allison Orr Larsen
The Precarious Art Of Classifying Facts, Allison Orr Larsen
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
Full Faith And Credit In The Post-Roe Era, Celia P. Janes
Full Faith And Credit In The Post-Roe Era, Celia P. Janes
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, once again leaving the question of whether abortion should be legal to individual state legislatures. This decision allowed the Texas law known as S.B. 8, alternatively known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, to go into effect. The law allows private individuals to sue anyone who has performed or has aided and abetted the performance or inducement of an abortion in Texas. California responded to this law with Assembly Bill 2091, which prevents California state courts from issuing subpoenas arising under S.B. 8 and similar laws in other states. This Note addresses …
Corpus Linguistics And The Original Public Meaning Of The Sixteenth Amendment, Thomas R. Lee, Lawrence B. Solum, James C. Phillips, Jesse A. Egbert
Corpus Linguistics And The Original Public Meaning Of The Sixteenth Amendment, Thomas R. Lee, Lawrence B. Solum, James C. Phillips, Jesse A. Egbert
Duke Law Journal Online
Moore v. United States raises the question whether unrealized gains, such as an increase in property value or a stock portfolio, constitute “incomes, from whatever source derived” under the original meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment. Moore is widely viewed as the most important tax case to reach the United States Supreme Court in decades. It is also an opportunity for the Court to refine its theory and method of finding original meaning.
We focus here on the original public meaning of the Sixteenth Amendment—the ordinary, common meaning attributed to its text by the general public in 1913. So far, the …
Communication With Public Officials In The Modern Age Of Social Media: Does It Violate The First Amendment When Public Officials Block Private Individuals From Their Social Media Pages?, Emily Cohen
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
In the modern world, social media dominates. It is considered an almost essential function of public officials, ranging from the President of the United States to local politicians, to maintain at least one social media page to keep the public updated on their policies and current events. As public officials shift toward social media to communicate with the public, these social media sites become the new spaces for public discourse, with members of the public often commenting on or responding to public officials' posts. As more public discourse occurs on these sites, and individuals begin to criticize their public officials …
Ukraine’S Supreme Court: Upholding Justice Amid War, Olena Kibenko, Cristobal Diaz
Ukraine’S Supreme Court: Upholding Justice Amid War, Olena Kibenko, Cristobal Diaz
Judicature International
No abstract provided.
Antisocial Innovation, Christopher Buccafusco, Samuel N. Weinstein
Antisocial Innovation, Christopher Buccafusco, Samuel N. Weinstein
Faculty Scholarship
Innovation is a form of civic religion in the United States. In the popular imagination, innovators are heroic figures. Thomas Edison, Steve Jobs, and (for a while) Elizabeth Holmes were lauded for their vision and drive and seen to embody the American spirit of invention and improvement. For their part, politicians rarely miss a chance to trumpet their vision for boosting innovative activity. Popular and political culture alike treat innovation as an unalloyed good. And the law is deeply committed to fostering innovation, spending billions of dollars a year to make sure society has enough of it. But this sunny …
Anti-Patents, Roy Baharad, Stuart Minor Benjamin, Ehud Gutte
Anti-Patents, Roy Baharad, Stuart Minor Benjamin, Ehud Gutte
Faculty Scholarship
Conventional wisdom has long perceived the patent and tort systems as separate legal entities, each tasked with a starkly different mission. Patent law rewards novel ideas; tort law deters harmful conduct. Against this backdrop, this Essay uncovers the opposing effects of patent and tort law on innovation, introducing the "injurer-innovator problem." Patent law incentivizes injurers --often uniquely positioned to make technological breakthroughs--by allowing them to profit from licensing their inventions to competitors. Yet tort law, by imposing liability for failures to invest in care, forces injurers to incur the cost of implementing their own innovations. When the cost of self-implementation …
Competition And Congestion In Trademark Law, Christopher Buccafusco, Jonathan S. Masur, Mark P. Mckenna
Competition And Congestion In Trademark Law, Christopher Buccafusco, Jonathan S. Masur, Mark P. Mckenna
Faculty Scholarship
Trademark law exists to promote competition. If consumers know which companies make which products, they can more easily find the products they actually want to purchase. Trademark law has long treated “source significance”—the fact that a particular trademark is identified with a particular producer—as both necessary and sufficient for establishing a valid trademark. That is, trademark law has traditionally viewed source significance as the only necessary precondition for a trademark being pro-competitive. In this Article, we argue that this equation of source significance and pro-competitiveness is misguided. Some marks use words that are so closely connected with the product being …
Looking Backward To Move Forward: Ending The "History And Tradition" Of Gun Violence Against The Lgbtq+ Community, Brett V. Ries
Looking Backward To Move Forward: Ending The "History And Tradition" Of Gun Violence Against The Lgbtq+ Community, Brett V. Ries
Duke Law Journal Online
Anti-LGBTQ+ gun violence is occurring in the United States at an alarming rate. The Department of Homeland Security has even issued a domestic terrorism warning for attacks against the LGBTQ+ community. When the shootings at the Pulse Nightclub in Florida and Club Q in Colorado are combined, fifty-four individuals were murdered and seventy-eight more were wounded while simply existing in an LGBTQ+ space. Both of these targeted shootings occurred within the past six years, indicating that anti-LGBTQ+ gun violence is not a relic of the past. As they were ten years ago, LGBTQ+ individuals are still disproportionately impacted by hate …
All Grown Up: Qualified Immunity, Student Rights, And The Way Forward, Matthew Mcknight, Angela Guo
All Grown Up: Qualified Immunity, Student Rights, And The Way Forward, Matthew Mcknight, Angela Guo
Duke Law Journal Online
No abstract provided.
101 Lawyers: Attorney Appearances In Twitter V. Musk, Andrew K. Jennings
101 Lawyers: Attorney Appearances In Twitter V. Musk, Andrew K. Jennings
Duke Law Journal Online
In summer 2022, Twitter sued Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, in Delaware’s Court of Chancery over his refusal to close his agreed-to $44 billion acquisition of the social-media company. Twitter v. Musk had the makings of corporate law’s trial of the century. Leading law firms represented Twitter, Musk, and third parties in a dispute with enormous financial, social, and political implications. In the lead up to trial, however, Musk relented and closed the deal. The corporate trial of the century was a bust, over almost as soon as it began.
But in the meantime, in Twitter’s eighty-six days of …
Inside The Internet, Nick Merrill, Tejas N. Narechania
Inside The Internet, Nick Merrill, Tejas N. Narechania
Duke Law Journal Online
Conventional wisdom—particularly in the legal literatures—suggests that competition reigns the inside of the internet. This common understanding has shaped regulatory approaches to questions of network security and competition policy among service providers. But the original research presented here undermines that long-held assumption. Where the markets for internet traffic exchange (and related services) have long been thought to be characterized by robust competition among various network services providers, our findings suggest that these markets have consolidated. These trends raise a host of concerns for network reliability, online speech, and consumer choice, among other matters. Indeed, some recent high-profile internet outages reflect …
Creditors Strike Back: The Return Of The Cooperation Agreement, Samir D. Parikh
Creditors Strike Back: The Return Of The Cooperation Agreement, Samir D. Parikh
Duke Law Journal Online
In the low interest rate environment that followed the Great Recession, a fanatical demand for high-yield investments provided private equity firms an opportunity. Newfound borrower leverage facilitated credit documents with few creditor safeguards and various loopholes. Borrowers subject to these “sponsor-favorable” terms now had options in times of financial distress. More specifically, they had the option to strike first.
Utilization of coercive exchanges began in earnest around 2015 and has since flourished. Unmonitored portfolio companies experiencing financial distress now regularly rely on questionable interpretations of ambiguous contractual provisions to surreptitiously move assets away from creditors’ collateral baskets and subordinate lenders. …
Climate Change And The Courts: Balancing Stewardship And Restraint, Susan Glazebrook
Climate Change And The Courts: Balancing Stewardship And Restraint, Susan Glazebrook
Judicature International
No abstract provided.
Ukraine’S Supreme Court: Born Amid Crisis, Now Under Siege, Sergii Koziakov, David Collins
Ukraine’S Supreme Court: Born Amid Crisis, Now Under Siege, Sergii Koziakov, David Collins
Judicature International
No abstract provided.
Playing The Long Game: The Role Of International Courts And Tribunals In The Russo-Ukrainian War, Paul W. Grimm, Kim Scheppele, Paul Stephan, Harold Hongju Koh, Oleksandra Matviichuk
Playing The Long Game: The Role Of International Courts And Tribunals In The Russo-Ukrainian War, Paul W. Grimm, Kim Scheppele, Paul Stephan, Harold Hongju Koh, Oleksandra Matviichuk
Judicature International
No abstract provided.
Upholding The Domestic Violence Firearm Prohibitors Under Bruen’S Second Amendment, Samantha L. Fawcett
Upholding The Domestic Violence Firearm Prohibitors Under Bruen’S Second Amendment, Samantha L. Fawcett
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Federal law prohibits individuals subject to a domestic violence protective order (§ 922(g)(8)) or convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors (§ 922(g)(9)) from possessing firearms. Before New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, these commonsense gun laws had generally been considered uncontroversial, both in terms of their broad popular support and their constitutionality under the Second Amendment. In Bruen, however, the Supreme Court held that when a regulation burdens a Second Amendment right, the regulation must be consistent with American historical tradition, meaning that the regulation must be analogous to a pattern of historical firearm regulation.
After …
Historic Preservation: Launched From Grand Central Terminal, But Derailing, Kraz Greinetz
Historic Preservation: Launched From Grand Central Terminal, But Derailing, Kraz Greinetz
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, the Supreme Court authorized the practice of historic preservation. Ruling that when a city designates a building as "historic" and therefore restricting its development, it is not a "taking" of private property that requires just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. Since that time, historic preservation has proliferated in America's cities. But it's time for another look. Since Penn Central was decided, the facts and law of property regulation in the United States have changed. And the decision, which was wrong from an originalist perspective when it was decided, has …
Gonzalez V. Google: The Case For Protecting "Targeted Recommendations", Tomer Kenneth, Ira Rubinstein
Gonzalez V. Google: The Case For Protecting "Targeted Recommendations", Tomer Kenneth, Ira Rubinstein
Duke Law Journal Online
Does Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protect online platforms (e.g., Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter) when they use recommendation algorithms? Lower courts upheld platforms’ immunity, notwithstanding notable dissenting opinions. The Supreme Court considers this question in Gonzalez v Google, LLC. Plaintiffs invite the Court to analyze “targeted recommendations” generically and to revoke Section 230 immunity for all recommended content. We think this would be a mistake.
This Article contributes to existing scholarship about Section 230 and online speech governance by adding much needed clarity to the desirable—and undesirable—regulation of recommendation algorithms. Specifically, this Article explains the technology behind algorithmic …
Tax Intelligence, Kathleen Claussen
Tax Intelligence, Kathleen Claussen
Duke Law Journal Online
At the start of 2023, tax policymakers are increasingly contemplating how tax law and policy could bolster U.S. foreign policy goals. The most recent proposals seek to leverage information gathered from tax reporting—what this Essay calls “tax intelligence.” However, front and center in considering how tax intelligence can be used to make foreign policy is a challenge: how that information can make its way through the grinder of our foreign commerce bureaucracy in furtherance of productive outcomes. To address this challenge and amplify the promise of these proposals, this Essay offers four contributions. First, it demonstrates that these proposals make …
Unique Civic Education Program Aims To Teach Young People About Courts And Civility, Robin L. Rosenberg, Beth Bloom
Unique Civic Education Program Aims To Teach Young People About Courts And Civility, Robin L. Rosenberg, Beth Bloom
Judicature International
No abstract provided.
Proposed Legal Reforms In Israel: Are Israel’S “Constitutional Conventions” In Jeopardy?, Peter Kahn, Dov Weissglas
Proposed Legal Reforms In Israel: Are Israel’S “Constitutional Conventions” In Jeopardy?, Peter Kahn, Dov Weissglas
Judicature International
No abstract provided.
Redlining Reimagined: "Race-Neutral Alternatives" In The Likely Wake Of Affirmative Action, Margaret Kruzner
Redlining Reimagined: "Race-Neutral Alternatives" In The Likely Wake Of Affirmative Action, Margaret Kruzner
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
For a decade, Justice Clarence Thomas has sharply criticized the Court's treatment of affirmative action, the race-conscious university admissions processed used to pursue the educational benefits associated with diverse classrooms. Calling affirmative action a "faddish theory" that the "Constitution abhors," Justice Thomas signaled his readiness to overrule Grutter v. Bollinger, which endorsed the practice in 2003.
Justice Thomas and the Court's originalist Justices have a new opportunity to strike down affirmative action in the Students for Fair Admissions litigation. Students for Fair Admissions, a non-profit organization founded by Edward Blum, is suing Harvard College and the University of North …
Moore V. Harper: The Independent State Legislature Theory And The Court At The Brink, Braden Fain
Moore V. Harper: The Independent State Legislature Theory And The Court At The Brink, Braden Fain
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
Moore v. Harper tasks the Supreme Court with considering a fringe legal idea known as the Independent State Legislature Theory (ISLT). Donald Trump gave ISLT new life by invoking the theory during his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Instead of presidential elections, the litigation in Moore concerns congressional elections and partisan gerrymandering. Were the Court to accept ISLT, the theory would render states effectively impotent to curb gerrymandering and would aggrandize the Court's authority in federal elections. Scholars have recognized the theory's threat to American democracy and have accordingly produced a detailed record debunking the ISLT. …
Murder And Money: The Dark Side Of Taylor Swift, Fredrick E. Vars
Murder And Money: The Dark Side Of Taylor Swift, Fredrick E. Vars
Duke Law Journal Online
Under the dramatically named “Slayer Rule,” murderers cannot inherit from their victims. This principle is so intuitive that it is easy to miss critical questions of implementation. One such question is: What if one cannot prove the murder with certainty? Should the Slayer Rule apply only to individuals convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of murder, or should some lower level of proof suffice? This essay examines those questions through an unlikely lens: the music of Taylor Swift.
The Spirit Of Gun Laws, Noah Levine
The Spirit Of Gun Laws, Noah Levine
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
The firearms debate in the United States often pits public health against freedom. This false dichotomy implies that gun laws, even wise ones, inherently erode individual liberty. Indeed, this appeal to liberty finds fertile ground in the United States, where many Americans intuitively reject any incursion on their freedom. Yet this one-sided conception of liberty is, at best, incomplete: while the government can certainly encroach on our freedom, so too can our fellow citizens.
A historically grounded conception of liberty in the United States includes the sense of security that fosters self-expression without fear of arbitrary constraint. That is, when …
Allen V. Milligan: Anticlassification And The Voting Rights Act, Graham Stinnett
Allen V. Milligan: Anticlassification And The Voting Rights Act, Graham Stinnett
Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar
The "crown jewel" of the Civil Rights Movement, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 has been called "one of the most effective statutes ever enacted." However, in 2013 the Supreme Court famously gutted the Voting Rights Act in Shelby County v. Holder. Nearly a decade later, in Allen v. Milligan, the Court is now signaling that Section 2, the last remaining core provision of the Voting Rights Act, could be on the chopping block. With Milligan, the Court may be preparing to inject race-neutrality into Section 2, which could destroy the vestiges of the onetime "super-statute."
This …