Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- SSRN (5)
- Contract (3)
- Contracts (3)
- Agriculture (2)
- Breach (2)
-
- Choice theory (2)
- Contract law (2)
- Contract negotiations (2)
- Forestry (2)
- Investments (2)
- Land (2)
- Law (2)
- Legal support (2)
- Absurd contract (1)
- Action (1)
- Agency law (1)
- Anticipatory repudiation (1)
- Barry Law Review (1)
- Bilateral modification theory (1)
- Broker (1)
- Consequential damages (1)
- Contract-market differential (1)
- Contractual autonomy (1)
- Corporate bylaw (1)
- Corporate contract (1)
- Counterparty risk (1)
- Cover as evidence (1)
- Damage estimation (1)
- Direct damages (1)
- Henningsen (1)
Articles 1 - 11 of 11
Full-Text Articles in Law
Governing Land Investments: Do Governments Have Legal Support Gaps?, Sam Szoke-Burke, Kaitlin Y. Cordes
Governing Land Investments: Do Governments Have Legal Support Gaps?, Sam Szoke-Burke, Kaitlin Y. Cordes
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications
In the wave of efforts to encourage and support more “responsible” land investments, one aspect has been largely overlooked: are governments equipped with the legal and technical support needed to effectively negotiate and conclude investment contracts that lead to responsible outcomes?
CCSI researched how host governments access legal support in the planning, negotiation, and monitoring of land investments, with a view to better understanding where legal support gaps for governments exist, and how these can be addressed by governments themselves, as well as by donors, support providers and investors.
By scrutinizing “legal support gaps,” CCSI sought to identify possible weak …
Governing Land Investments: Do Governments Have Legal Support Gaps?, Sam Szoke-Burke, Kaitlin Y. Cordes
Governing Land Investments: Do Governments Have Legal Support Gaps?, Sam Szoke-Burke, Kaitlin Y. Cordes
Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications
In the wave of efforts to encourage and support more “responsible” land investments, one aspect has been largely overlooked: are governments equipped with the legal and technical support needed to effectively negotiate and conclude investment contracts that lead to responsible outcomes?
CCSI researched how host governments access legal support in the planning, negotiation, and monitoring of land investments, with a view to better understanding where legal support gaps for governments exist, and how these can be addressed by governments themselves, as well as by donors, support providers and investors.
By scrutinizing “legal support gaps,” CCSI sought to identify possible weak …
Contractarian Theory And Unilateral Bylaw Amendments, Albert H. Choi, Geeyoung Min
Contractarian Theory And Unilateral Bylaw Amendments, Albert H. Choi, Geeyoung Min
Ira M. Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership
Corporate directors have been utilizing a potent mechanism in dealing with shareholder activism and shareholder litigation: the right to unilaterally amend corporate bylaws. Directors have exercised this right, for instance, to impose various requirements on who can nominate a director or call a special shareholder meeting, or to designate an exclusive forum where the shareholders can bring suit. Based on the theory that corporate charters and bylaws constitute a “contract” between the shareholders and the corporation, courts have blessed many of the bylaws that directors have unilaterally adopted. This Article examines the contractarian theory by drawing a parallel between amending …
The Macpherson-Henningsen Puzzle, Victor P. Goldberg
The Macpherson-Henningsen Puzzle, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
In the landmark case of MacPherson v. Buick, an automobile company was held liable for negligence notwithstanding a lack of privity with the injured driver. Four decades later, in Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, the court held unconscionable the standard automobile company warranty which limited its responsibility to repair and replacement, even in a case involving physical injury. This suggests a puzzle: if it were so easy for firms to contract out of liability, did MacPherson accomplish anything?
Remedies In The Ucc: Some Critical Thoughts, Victor P. Goldberg
Remedies In The Ucc: Some Critical Thoughts, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
I thank the conference organizers and the law review for giving me the opportunity to vent some of my frustrations with the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). I have expressed my concerns with the Code’s overreliance on “custom and usage” elsewhere, and will not pursue that further here. Nor will I bemoan the Code’s invocation of good faith to undo the parties’ balancing of flexibility and reliance. I will confine my discussion to contract remedies. But I have to begin by noting one section I simply do not understand. Why on earth would the Code drafters in § 2–718(2)(b) have required …
Reckoning Contract Damages: Valuation Of The Contract As An Asset, Victor P. Goldberg
Reckoning Contract Damages: Valuation Of The Contract As An Asset, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
When a contract is breached the law in most jurisdictions provides some version of the aphorism that the non-breaching party should be made whole. Application of the aphorism has proven problematic, particularly for anticipatory repudiations. This paper argues for a general principle that should guide application – the contract is an asset and the problem is one of valuation of the change in value of that asset at the time of the breach. This provides a framework that will help clear up some conceptual problems in damage assessment. The focus is on direct damages, not consequential damages.
The paper begins …
Why Autonomy Must Be Contract's Ultimate Value, Hanoch Dagan, Michael A. Heller
Why Autonomy Must Be Contract's Ultimate Value, Hanoch Dagan, Michael A. Heller
Faculty Scholarship
In “The Choice Theory of Contracts”, we develop a liberal theory of contract law. One core task of the book was to persuade advocates of economic analysis that they must situate their enterprise within our liberal framework. Autonomy, rightly understood, is the telos of contract.
Oren Bar-Gill pushes back strongly in “Choice Theory and the Economic Analysis of Contracts”. He offers a penetrating – perhaps devastating – critique of our approach. Bar-Gill notes the substantial convergence between choice theory and a welfarist view. If he is right, then what does choice theory add?
Our task in Part I of this …
Consequential Damages And Exclusion Clauses, Victor P. Goldberg
Consequential Damages And Exclusion Clauses, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
Contracts often include language excluding compensation for consequential damages. However, the boundary between consequential and direct damages is a blurry one. Courts have used concepts like foreseeability, natural result of the breach, and collateral business in their attempts to define the boundary. Those categories, I argue, are not particularly helpful. I consider three classes of cases: wrongful termination, delay, and breach of warranty. This paper argues that lost profits, when referring to the change in value of the contract after a wrongful termination would be direct damages; the hard case involves terminated dealers who had been paid indirectly for retailing …
The Lost Volume Seller In English Law, Victor P. Goldberg
The Lost Volume Seller In English Law, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
If a buyer breaches a contract but the market price has remained unchanged, English courts and the treatises have treated the seller as a “lost volume seller.” The seller, it is argued, could have had two sales, not one, so it lost the profit on the second sale. This paper recognizes that the buyer has an option to terminate and that the contract prices that option. The implicit option price of the lost volume remedy results in an absurd contract, setting the option price high when it should be low and vice versa. The default rule ought to be the …
The Middleman’S Damages Revisited, Victor P. Goldberg
The Middleman’S Damages Revisited, Victor P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
If A promises to sell to B who, in turn, promises to sell to C and either A or C breaches should B receive the gain it expected had both transactions occurred (lost profits) or the larger market/contract differential? Recent case law and commentary argues for the lost profit remedy. The argument is that there is a conflict between awarding market damages and making the nonbreacher whole. This paper argues that there is no conflict. If B were a broker, and C breached, then A would have an action against C for market damages. If B were party to the …
Autonomy For Contract, Refined, Hanoch Dagan, Michael A. Heller
Autonomy For Contract, Refined, Hanoch Dagan, Michael A. Heller
Faculty Scholarship
In The Choice Theory of Contracts, we advance a claim about the centrality of autonomy to contract. This Issue offers thoughtful and penetrating critiques. Here, we reply. Autonomy is the grounding principle of contract. In Choice Theory, we stressed the (1) proactive facilitation component of autonomy, in particular, the state’s obligation regarding contract types. Here, we highlight two additional, necessary implications of autonomy for contract: (2) regard for future selves and (3) relational justice. These three aspects of autonomy shape the range, limit, and floor, respectively, for the legitimate use of contract. They provide a principled and constrained path for …