Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Summary Of International Game Tech., Inc. V. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18, Krystal Gallagher
Summary Of International Game Tech., Inc. V. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18, Krystal Gallagher
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
This opinion rejects International Game Technology’s (hereinafter “IGT”) challenge to the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Nevada False Claims Act’s anti-retaliation provisions (hereinafter “FCA”). The Court also clarifies the meaning of the statute at issue, NRS 357.250.
Summary Of Public Employees’ Benefits Prog. V. Lvmpd, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 14, Meredith Holmes
Summary Of Public Employees’ Benefits Prog. V. Lvmpd, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 14, Meredith Holmes
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court order granting declaratory relief to Las Vegas Metro Police Department (Metro) and Clark County, regarding whether the local government employers were required to subsidize their retirees’ Public Employees’ Benefits Program (PEBP) premiums.
Summary Of Umc Physicians V. Nev. Serv. Emp. Union, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 9, William Miller
Summary Of Umc Physicians V. Nev. Serv. Emp. Union, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 9, William Miller
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
This appeal clarifies the procedure and standard for filing a complaint with Nevada’s Local Government Employee-Management Relations Board (the “Board”), under NRS 288.110 and NRS 288.040. The Nevada Supreme Court held that a complainant need only be an employee organization as defined in NRS 228.040 and have a legally recognizable interest in a justiciable controversy in order to file a complaint.