Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 10 of 10

Full-Text Articles in Law

Houchins V. Kqed Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1977

Houchins V. Kqed Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


New York V. Cathedral Academy, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1977

New York V. Cathedral Academy, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Civilizing Pornography: The Case For An Exclusive Obscenity Nuisance Statute, Doug R. Rendleman Apr 1977

Civilizing Pornography: The Case For An Exclusive Obscenity Nuisance Statute, Doug R. Rendleman

Faculty Publications

Criminal penalties are increasingly perceived to be too severe for regulating obscenity. Professor Rendleman shares this perception and suggests that we replace criminal obscenity laws with an exclusive civil sanction utilizing injunctions. He proposes a comprehensive nuisance statute and discusses the various issues that arise in the equitable regulation of pornography.


Constitutional Privilege To Republish Defamation, Leslie Levin Jan 1977

Constitutional Privilege To Republish Defamation, Leslie Levin

Faculty Articles and Papers

Underlying the development of the law of defamation is a tension between two broad societal interests: protecting the reputation of individuals and safeguarding the free flow of discussion and information. The common law heavily favored the protection of reputation, offering only limited concessions to the competing interest. In recent years, however, the Supreme Court has refashioned the law of defamation to conform to a first amendment mandate that "debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and wide-open." In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and subsequent cases, the Court established that public officials and public figures may not recover …


The Hazards To The Press Of Claiming A “Preferred Position”, William W. Van Alstyne Jan 1977

The Hazards To The Press Of Claiming A “Preferred Position”, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Cracks In “The New Property”: Adjudicative Due Process In The Administrative State, William W. Van Alstyne Jan 1977

Cracks In “The New Property”: Adjudicative Due Process In The Administrative State, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Tenure Rights In Contractual And Constitutional Context, Ronald C. Brown Jan 1977

Tenure Rights In Contractual And Constitutional Context, Ronald C. Brown

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The National Labor Relations Act And The Forgotten First Amendment, James E. Bond Jan 1977

The National Labor Relations Act And The Forgotten First Amendment, James E. Bond

Faculty Articles

In this article Professor Bond discusses several points. First, the freedom of association principle, whatever its constitutional paternity, is now treated by the Court as one among first amendment equals. It is thus a fundamental right which the government may limit only for the most compelling reasons and then only in that way which least intrudes upon its exercise. Second, the relationship of an employee both to his employer and to his fellow employees involves associational rights of the kind guaranteed and protected by the first amendment. Third, the exclusive representation rule' of the National Labor Relations Act seriously interferes …


The Supreme Court And The Constitutional Rights Of Prisoners: A Reappraisal, Emily Calhoun Jan 1977

The Supreme Court And The Constitutional Rights Of Prisoners: A Reappraisal, Emily Calhoun

Publications

No abstract provided.


Prior Restraints On Freedom Of Expression By Defendants And Defense Attorneys: Ratio Decidendi V. Obiter Dictum, Monroe H. Freedman, Janet Starwood Jan 1977

Prior Restraints On Freedom Of Expression By Defendants And Defense Attorneys: Ratio Decidendi V. Obiter Dictum, Monroe H. Freedman, Janet Starwood

Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship

Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart presents the Supreme Court's most strenuous disapproval of prior restraints on the press to date. Despite its concern for the first amendment rights of the press, however, the Court showed no such solicitude for the free speech rights of defendants and their attorneys. Instead, the two major opinions in Nebraska Press Association both contain unsupported, conclusory language suggesting that the special protection afforded the press might somehow be inapplicable to restraints against defendants and defense attorneys. The implication is that in order to secure their rights to fair trials defendants may have to sacrifice their …