Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Conscientious Objector And The First Amendment: There But For The Grace Of God . . ., John Henry Schlegel Oct 1966

The Conscientious Objector And The First Amendment: There But For The Grace Of God . . ., John Henry Schlegel

Journal Articles

No abstract provided.


The First Amendment And The Suppression Of Warmongering Propaganda In The United States: Comments And Footnotes, William W. Van Alstyne Jul 1966

The First Amendment And The Suppression Of Warmongering Propaganda In The United States: Comments And Footnotes, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

In an attempt to determine how the First Amendment may protect speakers’ rights to make inflammatory statements calling for violence against a sovereign, this article breaks down this larger question into three categories based on the speaker: the government, foreigners abroad, or American citizens.


Note On Elfbrandt V. Russell And Loyalty Oaths, Jethro K. Lieberman Jan 1966

Note On Elfbrandt V. Russell And Loyalty Oaths, Jethro K. Lieberman

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.


The Finance Cases, Jethro K. Lieberman Jan 1966

The Finance Cases, Jethro K. Lieberman

Other Publications

No abstract provided.


Symposium: Student Rights And Campus Rules, Michael E. Tigar Jan 1966

Symposium: Student Rights And Campus Rules, Michael E. Tigar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Elfbrandt V. Russell: The Demise Of The Loyalty Oath, Jerold H. Israel Jan 1966

Elfbrandt V. Russell: The Demise Of The Loyalty Oath, Jerold H. Israel

Articles

In Elfbrandt v. Russell, the Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 decision, declared unconstitutional Arizona's requirement of a loyalty oath from state employees. At first glance, Elfbrandt appears to be just another decision voiding a state loyalty oath on limited grounds relating to the specific language of the particular oath. Yet, several aspects of Mr. Justice Douglas' opinion for the majority suggest that Elfbrandt is really of far greater significance: it may sharply limit the scope and coverage of loyalty oaths generally and, indeed, may presage a ruling invalidating all such oaths. Of course, only the Supreme Court can determine this. …


Reflections On The Academic Senate Resolution, Robert M. O'Neil Jan 1966

Reflections On The Academic Senate Resolution, Robert M. O'Neil

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.