Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Burger Court (2)
- Police (2)
- Warren Court (2)
- Admissibility (1)
-
- Applicability (to the states) (1)
- Bill of Rights (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Congress (1)
- Congressional authority (1)
- Criminal justice (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Double Jeopardy (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Enumerated powers (1)
- Equality (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Federalist tradition (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- History (1)
- Identification (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Language (1)
- Legislative powers (1)
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Ohio ex rel. Eaton v. Price (1)
- Right to speedy trial (1)
- Searches (1)
- Seizures (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Dissent From The Miranda Dissents: Some Comments On The 'New' Fifth Amendment And The Old 'Voluntariness' Test, Yale Kamisar
A Dissent From The Miranda Dissents: Some Comments On The 'New' Fifth Amendment And The Old 'Voluntariness' Test, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
If the several conferences and workshops (and many lunch conversations) on police interrogation and confessions in which I have participated this past summer are any indication, Miranda v. Arizona has evoked much anger and spread much sorrow among judges, lawyers and professors. In the months and years ahead, such reaction is likely to be translated into microscopic analyses and relentless, probing criticism of the majority opinion. During this period of agonizing appraisal and reappraisal, I think it important that various assumptions and assertions in the dissenting opinions do not escape attention.
Criminal Procedure, The Burger Court, And The Legacy Of The Warren Court, Jerold H. Israel
Criminal Procedure, The Burger Court, And The Legacy Of The Warren Court, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
During the 1960s, the Warren Court's decisions in the field of criminal procedure were strongly denounced by many prosecutors, police officers, and conservative politicians. Some of these critics were careful in their description of the Warren Court's record. Others let their strong opposition to several of the Court's more highly publicized decisions destroy their perception of the Court's work as a whole.
The Expansion Of Federal Legislative Authority, Terrance Sandalow
The Expansion Of Federal Legislative Authority, Terrance Sandalow
Book Chapters
During the 190 years since the Constitution's adoption, the legislative authority of the Congress has greatly expanded. In the beginning, Congress's powers were closely circumscribed, but over the years the boundaries by which they were initially confined have been almost entirely obliterated. Congress has ceased to be merely the legislative authority of a federal government; it has for all practical purposes acquired the legislative authority of a unitary nation. Especially in the economic sphere, it is only a small exaggeration to say that Congress now possesses plenary authority.
Of course, Congress need not-and, in fact, does not--exercise all the power …
Selective Incorporation Revisited, Jerold H. Israel
Selective Incorporation Revisited, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
In June 1960 Justice Brennan's separate opinion in Ohio ex re. Eaton v. Price' set forth what came to be the doctrinal foundation of the Warren Court's criminal procedure revolution. Justice Brennan advocated adoption of what is now commonly described as the "selective incorporation" theory of the fourteenth amendment. That theory, simply put, holds that the fourteenth amendment's due process clause fully incorporates all of those guarantees of the Bill of Rights deemed to be fundamental and thereby makes those guarantees applicable to the states. During the decade that followed Ohio ex re. Eaton v. Price, the Court found incorporated …