Law Commons^™

Appeal No. 0397: Ohio Production Corporation V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 90-24, 90-187, and 90-188

Appeal No. 0400: Ohio Production Corporation V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 90-24, 90-187, and 90-188

Appeal No. 0401: Ohio Production Corporation V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief, Division Of Oil And Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 90-24, 90-187, and 90-188

Appeal No. 0429: R.Z. Frost & Assoc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Board Of Oil And Gas Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 90-1012

Appeal No. 0425: Oil And Gas Insurance Company V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Board Of Oil And Gas Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 91-383

Appeal No. 0447: Tatco, Inc. V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Board Of Oil And Gas Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 91-120

Appeal No. 0473: Constitution Petroleum V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Dept. Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 91-316

Appeal No. 0411: J & L Technology Group V. J. Michael Biddison, Chief Division Of Oil And Gas Ohio Department Of Natural Resources, Board Of Oil And Gas Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 90-357

An Issue-Driven Strategy For Review Of Agency Decisions, Charles H. Koch Jr.

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0389: Eglee Mountain Energy Corp. V. Donald L. Manson, Esq, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 89-822

Appeal No. 0455: Mid Atlantic Oil, Company V. Donald L. Mason Esq., Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Depart. Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 91-166

Regulation Of Ground Water In Salt Lake Valley, Robert L. Morgan

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

24 pages (includes illustrations and maps).

Contains references.

The Public Interest: A Matter Of Discretion?, R. Keith Higginson

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

15 pages.

Federal Regulatory Interests In Water, Patricia Sanderson Port

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

39 pages.

Contains references.

Washington Instream Resources Protection: In Transition, Hedia Adelsman

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

45 pages.

Contains references.

Dam Fights And Water Policy In California: 1969-1989, Harrison C. Dunning

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

49 pages (includes illustrations and maps).

Contains references.

Big Horn River Litigation Experience: The Second Generation – Post Decree Administration, Gordon W. Fassett

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

5 pages.

Pyramid Lake Negotiated Settlement: Overview And Perspective, Joe Ely

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

20 pages.

The 1990 Fort Hall Water Rights Agreement: A Study In The Federal Trust Responsibility, Indian Self-Determination, And Water Rights Settlement, John S. Bushman

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

171 pages.

Coordinated Water Management Under The Prior Appropriation Doctrine In New Mexico: The Rio Grande Case – The Pecos River Case, Eluid L. Martinez

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

26 pages.

Agenda: Innovation In Western Water Law And Management, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

Conference organizers and/or faculty included University of Colorado School of Law professors Lawrence J. MacDonnell, David H. Getches, Charles F. Wilkinson and Richard B. Collins.

Pressures of population, drought, and changing water use have provided the impetus for numerous innovations in water law and management in recent years. The Center's annual conference June 5-7, 1991, will look at innovation and change in five areas--water planning, special water management areas, negotiated settlements of tribal water rights, conjunctive use of ground and surface water, and public values in water decision making. Each session will begin with talks by experts from several western …

Designing Dispute Resolution Systems For Water Policy And Management, Karen L. Barclay, Matthew J. Mckinney

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

34 pages.

Contains references.

The Meteoric Evolution Of Arizona’S Eccentric Active Management Areas, Michael F. Mcnulty

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

27 pages.

Developing The 1990 Texas Water Plan: A Coordinated Circus, Tommy Knowles

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

14 pages.

Kansas Intensive Groundwater Use Control Areas, David L. Pope

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

22 pages (includes maps).

Contains references.

Water Management: Southern High Plains Of Texas, A. Wayne Wyatt

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

22 pages.

Preparation And Implementation Of The State Water Plan In Kansas, Stephen A. Hurst

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

12 pages (includes illustrations and maps).

Contains footnotes.

Water Planning: The Oregon Approach, William H. Young

Innovation in Western Water Law and Management (Summer Conference, June 5-7)

64 pages.

Getting From Here To There, Cynthia R. Farina

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

The Constitutional Case Against Intracircuit Nonacquiescence, Dan T. Coenen

Scholarly Works

A cornerstone of the United States Constitution is its separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the national government. The Framers of the Constitution reasoned that separated powers would guard against tyranny by blocking the undue concentration of authority in any single governmental department. In crafting the Constitution, however, the Framers could not anticipate every dispute their scheme of separated powers might engender. One modern separation-of-powers conflict not specifically anticipated by the constitutional text involves so-called "intracircuit nonacquiescence.”

Intracircuit nonacquiescence occurs when executive-branch decision makers refuse to follow a circuit court's precedents even when acting subject …