Law Commons^™

Table Of Contents, Volume 61, Number 1, Winter 2023 [And Other Preliminary Pages]

Duquesne Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Death And Resurrection Of Establishment Doctrine, Gerard V. Bradley

Duquesne Law Review

Lead Article

The biggest news of the Supreme Court's 2021-22 term was the Court's "abandonment" of Lemon v. Kurtzman as the default test for Establishment Clause jurisprudence. For a full half-century, Lemon v. Kurtzman defined what our constitutional separation of church and state meant. But now the Court has definitively laid it to rest. The important question of church-state relations stands at a strategic fork in the road that the Court has not faced since 1962, and perhaps not since 1947. Justice Gorsuch complained that Lemon demonstrably failed as law. That it was a judicial tool that flopped by every …

Analysis Of Carson V. Makin, Wilson Huhn

Duquesne Law Review

Many school districts in the State of Maine lack high schools, so the children in those districts must attend another school selected by their parents.¹ In 1873 the State of Maine enacted a tuition assistance program, called "town tuitioning," that offers a stipend to participating schools to partially defray the cost of educating children from districts that lack a high school.² In 1981 the State of Maine enacted a law that categorically excludes "sectarian schools" from participating in the tuition assistance program.³ The Maine Department of Education defines a "sectarian school" as a school that is both …

Table Of Contents, Volume 61, Number 2, Summer 2023 [And Other Preliminary Pages]

Duquesne Law Review

No abstract provided.

"We Don't Know What We Want": The Tug Between Rights And Public Health Online, Jonathan Zittrain

Duquesne Law Review

Twitter and Facebook boast billions of subscribers, many of whom are real people. The companies are also roundly hated, particularly by tech experts-at least those who follow them for something other than their stock performance.¹ Objections to platforms' behavior are commonly expressed as amazement that they could be so obviously and consistently wrong in failing to police awful content their users post. There is also amazement about unobjectionable posts and comments from users that they take down.² That, in turn, has led to pressure for regulatory initiatives to push the companies into doing what they so clearly ought …

The Tug Between Private And Public Power Online, Evelyn Douek

Duquesne Law Review

Professor Zittrain's article describes, in his characteristically vivid and engaging way, one of the most consequential tugs of war of the internet age: the battle over the rules for what can and cannot be said online. The legal centerpiece of Zittrain's story is the Skokie case from the late 1970s, which held that Nazis had a First Amendment right to march in a Chicago suburb with a large population of Holocaust survivors.¹ Zittrain calls the case "a near-perfect encapsulation of mainstream late twentieth century characterization of the right to free speech in America."² And he's right-there is perhaps …

Platform Governance's Legitimate Dilemmas, Alicia Solow-Niederman

Duquesne Law Review

How can we govern if "we don't know what we want?"¹ In characteristically engaging and thought-provoking fashion, Jonathan Zittrain's Essay interrogates our ongoing struggle to answer this thorny question.² As Professor Zittrain exposes, governing social media firms like Twitter and Facebook is no easy feat.³ Part of the challenge is defining the problem itself: it's hard to diagnose what, exactly, "is so 'obviously' wrong" with social media today.⁴ Naturally, without a consensus on what is wrong, it is difficult, if not impossible, to make it right.

Whose Ledger Is Really Red? Confidential Arbitration Killed The Black Widow, Daniel Charles Smolsky

Duquesne Law Review

After filing a complaint against the Walt Disney Company in July 2021, Scarlett Johansson ensured that she would follow through with litigation to protect other Hollywood talent. Despite that assurance, Johansson settled her suit with Disney only sixty-three days after filing her complaint. This Article explores what Johansson's shockingly swift settlement reveals about not only the entertainment industry, but the majority of modern employment disputes. Did Disney abuse its power and intentionally sacrifice box-office profits at Johansson's expense, or did Johansson leverage her public influence to compel an unwarranted settlement? Whose ledger is really red and perhaps more importantly why …

The Pricelessness Of Life Vs. Profiting From Illness: A Call For Change To The Pricing Model For Lifesaving Drugs In The United States, Aubri L. Swank

Duquesne Law Review

Pharmaceutical drug prices in the United States are at the highest costs yet seen, and it looks like these prices are still continuing to climb. While people in the United States are struggling to pay for necessary medications, the prices of those same medications are drastically lower in other countries.

This Article directly analyzes the issue of pharmaceutical pricing in the United States through two specific lifesaving drugs, insulin and epinephrine. Both drugs are prescriptions required to keep some people alive, and both are related to manufacturing companies with questionable, overwhelming control of the markets. While there has been recent …

Covid-19 And Broadband Internet: Historic Government Funding In The Wake Of A Global Pandemic Poised To Bridge The Digital Divide, Kaitlin M. Kroll

Duquesne Law Review

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted how Americans live, work, and learn. As the country returns to normalcy, reliable, fast internet connection is critical for Americans it is no longer a luxury, it is a necessity. While many Americans do not think twice about having internet connectivity, there are still many Americans who are unable to access or afford the internet, especially in rural communities and low-income households. In the wake of the pandemic, Congress allocated historic amounts of funding for broadband initiatives. The most substantial of which are the broadband allocations under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ("IIJA'). While the …

Running A Red Light: How Pennsylvania Rushed To Its Destination And Failed To Define "Exigent Circumstances" In Commonwealth V. Alexander, Josephine L. Mlakar

Duquesne Law Review

The United States Supreme Court and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court both recognize an "automobile exception" to the warrant requirement pursuant to their respective constitutions. In 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court adopted the federal automobile exception. Under the federal automobile exception, police can search a vehicle without a warrant where probable cause exists. In 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overruled its 2014 decision, and announced its official departure from federal standard. Now, police can search a vehicle without a warrant only upon a showing of both probable cause and exigent circumstances.

Adding an exigency component to the warrantless search requirement is …

Increasing Representation: Expanding Intersectional Claims In Employment Discrimination, Anna Maria Sicenica

Duquesne Law Review

The trend of globalization has only continued to bring workers from different races, religions, and countries to the United States. Moreover, in a country where women continue to become a larger part of the workforce every year, and as the age of retirement continues to grow, there will inevitably be more women who will face discrimination on multiple grounds: specifically, for their age and sex. Thus, it is no wonder that "intersectional claimants," or claimants that belong to least two or more protected classes under the law, now make up the majority of the workforce.

However, despite the fact that …

Let The Right Ones In: The Supreme Court's Changing Approach To Justiciability, Richard L. Heppner Jr.

Duquesne Law Review

In last term's blockbuster case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, one of the considerations Justice Alito cited for overturning Roe and Casey was that they "have led to the distortion of many important but unrelated legal doctrines."¹ Alito asserted that abortion jurisprudence has, among other things, "ignored the Court's third-party standing doctrine."² Whether that is a fair description of the case law is debatable. But it raises the question of whether the newly ascendant conservative majority might likewise distort standing doctrine, and other justiciability doctrines, in order to decide particular, controversial issues.

Applying Bentham's Theory Of Fallacies To Chief Justice Robert's Reasoning In West Virginia V. Epa, Dana Neacsu

Duquesne Law Review

There are two issues in West Virginia v. EPA.¹ One regards justiciability, and the other delegation. Article III of the Federal Constitution limits justiciability to controversies, to disputes involving an injured party whose harm the judiciary believes it can remedy. The Constitution is silent on delegation.

This Essay summarizes the Court's decision in West Virginia v. EPA.² It also analyzes Chief Justice Roberts' reasoning and addresses the case's flaws from two perspectives. It references the Court's decision connecting it to the so-called New Deal Cases,³ because in both Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan,^{4 …}

Foreword: New Supreme Court Cases: Duquesne Law Faculty Explains, Wilson Huhn

Duquesne Law Review

During the 2021-2022 Term, the United States Supreme Court issued several groundbreaking opinions that fundamentally changed the interpretation of the Constitution in a number of areas, including freedom of religion under both the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause; reproductive freedom and the Right to Privacy; and justiciability, administrative law and the Separation of Powers. The Court also granted certiorari in another case that may have an enormous impact on our representative democracy and the right to vote in federal elections.

Privacy: Pre- And Post-Dobbs, Rona Kaufman

Duquesne Law Review

The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to include a fundamental right to familial privacy. The exact contours of that right were developed by the Court from 1923 until 2015 and included: (1) the right to parent-that is the right to care, custody, and control of one's children;¹ (2) a qualified right to be safe from forced sterilization;² (3) the right of married couples and single persons to determine whether to bear or beget a child, including the right to access contraception and abortion;³ (4) the right to marry …

Talk Should Be Cheap: The Supreme Court Has Spoken On Compelled Fees, But Universities Are Not Listening, Falco Anthony Muscante Ii

Duquesne Law Review

Taking money from a person to support political and ideological projects with which that person disagrees is, in the words of Thomas Jefferson, "sinful and tyrannical." Public universities are meddling with sin and tyranny by compelling some students to pay mandatory student activity fees in support of political and ideological activities with which those students disagree. This Article provides separate legal and historical backgrounds for both public union dues and fees and the more-recent public university student activity fees to ultimately propose a constitutional system congruent with Janus v. AFSCME, Council 31, and its impact on Board of Regents …

Rule 4(K)(2) And The Online Marketplace: An Efficient And Constitutional Route To Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Merchants Of Counterfeits, Taylor J. Pollier

Duquesne Law Review

The online marketplace has exploded as an efficient way for U.S. consumers to get the goods they need and want delivered directly to their doors. At the same time, the prevalence of counterfeit goods offered for sale on those marketplaces has grown. Companies in the United States that own the intellectual property rights to products being counterfeited online often use various methods to stop the infringement before court intervention is necessary. Ultimately, however, those companies may need to sue the infringing party to enforce their rights. Without the 1993 addition of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2), that would not …

A "Mere Shadow" Of A Conflict: Obscuring The Establishment Clause In Kennedy V. Bremerton, Ann L. Schiavone

Duquesne Law Review

In Kennedy v. Bremerton School District,¹ the Roberts Court continued its move to carve out larger spaces for religious practice and expression in public spheres.² But in so doing it left lower courts and school districts with many more questions than answers concerning what the Establishment Clause means and what it requires of them. Can school districts still protect students from religious coercion by teachers, classmates, and others? Are entanglements between church and state or the appearance of endorsement no longer problematic?³ Should the individual history and tradition of schools and communities influence decision making on …

An Alternative To The Independent State Legislature Doctrine, Ledewitz Bruce

Duquesne Law Review

One of the most momentous actions taken by the United States Supreme Court in the last term was not deciding a case but granting review at the end of the term in Moore v. Harper, the North Carolina congressional redistricting case.¹ This is the case in which the Supreme Court appears likely to adopt some version of the Independent State Legislature Doctrine (Doctrine). In this essay, I will describe the actual case and the Doctrine. But I will also be offering an alternative to the Doctrine, one that I believe achieves some of the goals that the Justices …

Mail-In Voting And The Pennsylvania Constitution, Stephen E. Friedman

Duquesne Law Review

Pennsylvania was at the center of many of the disputes that arose after the hotly contested 2020 presidential election. One of the most significant challenges was a claim that Pennsylvania's newly enacted mail-in voting law violated the state's constitution. Plaintiffs in one lawsuit asked that all mail-in ballots be discarded, which would have shifted Pennsylvania's electoral votes to Donald Trump. When this lawsuit failed, challengers unsuccessfully objected to Congress counting Pennsylvania's electoral votes. A core argument both in court and in Congress was that the Pennsylvania Constitution requires in-person voting except where it specifically provides otherwise. The claim is supported …

An Underestimated Showcase Of Student Scholarship: Law School Institutional Repositories, Dajiang Nie

Duquesne Law Review

Law schools have been using institutional repositories as a showcase for law journals and faculty scholarly achievements for a long time, but law school institutional repositories fail to collect student scholarship regularly. Aspects of law school institutional repositories make no sense when directly benefiting both students and law schools and failing to display student scholarship. This Article examines student scholarship in law school institutional repositories, analyzing its current status, advantages, and keys to success. The Article shows that law school institutional repositories underappreciate student scholarship, and the content of student repositories also lacks diversity. This approach impairs the positive impacts …

"Thank You For Your Sacrifice": Off-Label Drug Regulation Strategies After The Misuse Of Hydroxychloroquine For Covid-19, Erin Mccluan

Duquesne Law Review

In March 2020, BuzzFeed News reported that a 45-year-old patient with systemic lupus erythematosus ("SLE") was denied her long-standing hydroxychloroquine ("HCQ") prescription due to the COVID-19 pandemic.¹ Her healthcare network, Kaiser Permanente, informed her that this was necessary to "conserve[] the current supply for those who are critically ill with COVID-19."² Disturbingly, Kaiser wrote to the patient, "Thank you for the sacrifice you will be making for the sake of those that are critically ill; your sacrifice may actually save lives." ³

The patient, Dale, who asked only to be identified by her first name, told BuzzFeed News, …

Putting The "P" In Pfa: The Electronic Monitoring Of Protection From Abuse Respondents In Pennsylvania, Cameron Kehm

Duquesne Law Review

Domestic violence violently claimed Alina Sheykhet's life, despite alleged "protection" from a Protection from Abuse Order ("PFA").¹ Far from being an exception, Alina's story is yet another example among many cases that show how traditional protective order systems fail those who need protected most.² However, Alina's Law can protect PFA holders through a new remedy: the electronic monitoring of PFA respondents.³ Although Alina's Law failed to make it out of committee consideration during the 2019-2020 term,⁴ with three modifications, legislators can reintroduce Alina's Law in a passable form that would protect Pennsylvania's most vulnerable citizens.

Part …

The Inscrutability Problem: From First-Generation Forensic Science To Neuroimaging Evidence, Jane Campbell Moriarty

Duquesne Law Review

Expert testimony continues to turn away from human-based skills to embrace machine-based evidence. Technology is used to identify and locate individuals, unlock encrypted devices, and even to evaluate criminal responsibility. Perhaps this is a positive change. The shortcomings of first-generation forensic identification specialties are substantial and include the inscrutability of its subjective comparisons. As such, this newer generation of evidence may well be an improvement. Yet the inscrutability problem adopts many forms. Machine-based evidence relies on hardware, software, algorithms, statistics, and engineering to reach results-ones created and interpreted by humans subject to bias and cognitive error; results the justice system …

Technology - Revealing Or Framing The Truth? A Jurisprudential Debate, Dana Neacsu

Duquesne Law Review

Technology is so much more than a prosthetic. But how much more? And what else is it? In the legal realm, its role is not yet clear. Such a lack of elucidation becomes problematic, especially when technology has the ability to convert assumptions into facts, and it takes on a truth-making, rather than a mere truth-revealing mission. This Article argues that it is problematic to enable technology to stand in for reflective thinking, and calls attention to the fact that evidentiary rules enable technology to decide what can be proven, ergo what truth is.

Considering "Machine Testimony": The Impact Of Facial Recognition Software On Eyewitness Identifications, Valena Beety

Duquesne Law Review

Andrea Roth's seminal work in Machine Testimony and Trial by Machine presented a problem that is now upon us: addressing biased algorithms and the rampant reliance on technology by prosecutors and law enforcement.¹ That reliance, however, is no longer unquestioning. Roth's work came at a crucial moment in time, when other articles were embracing the apparent impartiality of technology and algorithms for use in the criminal legal system. Her scholarship steered us away from that blind acceptance and dove deep, not only questioning technology itself, but also how to frame those questions of technology in the courtroom.

Biometrics And An Ai Bill Of Rights, Margaret Hu

Duquesne Law Review

This Article contends that an informed discussion on an Al Bill of Rights requires grappling with biometric data collection and its integration into emerging Al systems. Biometric Al systems serve a wide range of governmental purposes, including policing, border security and immigration enforcement, and biometric cyberintelligence and biometric-enabled warfare. These systems are increasingly categorized as "high-risk" when deployed in ways that may impact fundamental constitutional rights and human rights. There is growing recognition that high-risk biometric AI systems, such as facial recognition identification, can pose unprecedented challenges to criminal procedure rights. This Article concludes that a failure to recognize these …

From Beyonce To Bohemia: Reforming Joint Copyright Ownership, William Frank Weber

Duquesne Law Review

JaQuel Knight. Reading this name, for many, will give them no feeling of recognition. The same people that do not know his name will more than likely immediately recognize this next name, Beyonce. Her name immediately conjures up iconic images, songs, and music videos. She is a global star that has released six studio solo albums, all of which have reached number one on the U.S. Billboard charts.¹ Two of Beyonce's hit songs are "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" and "Formation." "Formation," with its numerous Beyonce dance routines, the solo dance of a young, hooded boy in …

Table Of Contents, Volume 60, Number 2, Summer 2022 [And Other Preliminary Pages]

Duquesne Law Review

No abstract provided.