Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 75

Full-Text Articles in Law

Constitutional Injury And Tangibility, Rachel Bayefsky May 2018

Constitutional Injury And Tangibility, Rachel Bayefsky

William & Mary Law Review

The Supreme Court, in the 2016 case Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, announced a framework for determining whether a plaintiff had alleged an injury that would permit entry into federal court. The Court indicated that a plaintiff, in order to have constitutional standing, needed to suffer harm that was “concrete” or “real.” In explaining how courts could ascertain whether an alleged harm was concrete, the Court created a category of “intangible” harm subject to a distinctive, and arguably more demanding, concreteness inquiry than “tangible” harm, a category that seemingly includes only physical or economic harm. In particular, Spokeo directed courts …


Equal Liberty In Proportion, Joshua E. Weishart Oct 2017

Equal Liberty In Proportion, Joshua E. Weishart

William & Mary Law Review

As federal law continues to devolve more education policy making to states, state courts will remain a primary forum for settling education rights. State fora do not inspire confidence, however, because their doctrine is so uncertain. A majority of state supreme courts do not specify a level of scrutiny and at times seem to be improvising judicial review. The resulting decisions can exhibit a troubling lack of foresight. Most notably, while federal doctrine increasingly reveals the interrelation of liberty and equality claims, state courts have failed to capitalize on that point—even though their decisions were among the first to concede …


Legislative Exhaustion, Michael Sant’Ambrogio Mar 2017

Legislative Exhaustion, Michael Sant’Ambrogio

William & Mary Law Review

Legislative lawsuits are a recurring by-product of divided government. Yet the Supreme Court has never definitively resolved whether Congress may sue the executive branch over its execution of the law. Some scholars argue that Congress should be able to establish Article III standing when its interests are harmed by executive action or inaction just like private parties. Others, including most prominently the late Justice Antonin Scalia, argue that intergovernmental disputes do not constitute Article III “cases” or “controversies” at all. Rather, the Framers envisioned the political branches resolving their differences through nonjudicial means.

This Article proposes a different approach to …


Protean Statutory Interpretation In The Courts Of Appeals, James J. Brudney, Lawrence Baum Feb 2017

Protean Statutory Interpretation In The Courts Of Appeals, James J. Brudney, Lawrence Baum

William & Mary Law Review

This Article is the first in-depth empirical and doctrinal analysis of differences in statutory interpretation between the courts of appeals and the Supreme Court. It is also among the first to anticipate how the Supreme Court’s interpretive approach may shift with the passing of Justice Scalia.

We begin by identifying factors that may contribute to interpretive divergence between the two judicial levels, based on their different institutional structures and operational realities. In doing so, we discuss normative implications that may follow from the prospect of such interpretive divergence. We then examine how three circuit courts have used dictionaries and legislative …


Speech, Intent, And The Chilling Effect, Leslie Kendrick Apr 2013

Speech, Intent, And The Chilling Effect, Leslie Kendrick

William & Mary Law Review

Speaker’s intent requirements are a common but unremarked feature of First Amendment law. From the “actual malice” standard for defamation to the specific-intent requirement for incitement, many types of expression are protected or unprotected depending on the state of mind with which they are said. To the extent that courts and commentators have considered why speaker’s intent should determine First Amendment protection, they have relied upon the chilling effect. On this view, imposing strict liability for harmful speech, such as defamatory statements, would overdeter, or chill, valuable speech, such as true political information. Intent requirements are necessary prophylactically to provide …


Communis Opinio And The Method Of Statutory Interpretation: Interpreting Law Or Changing Law, Michael P. Healy Dec 2001

Communis Opinio And The Method Of Statutory Interpretation: Interpreting Law Or Changing Law, Michael P. Healy

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Strategy For Mercy, Robert L. Misner Apr 2000

A Strategy For Mercy, Robert L. Misner

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Gazing Into The Crystal Ball: Reflections On The Standards State Judges Should Use To Ascertain Federal Law, Donald H. Zeigler Apr 1999

Gazing Into The Crystal Ball: Reflections On The Standards State Judges Should Use To Ascertain Federal Law, Donald H. Zeigler

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Crimes Against Autonomy: Gerald Dworkin On The Enforcement Of Morality, Lawrence C. Becker Mar 1999

Crimes Against Autonomy: Gerald Dworkin On The Enforcement Of Morality, Lawrence C. Becker

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Devlin Was Right: Law And The Enforcement Of Morality, Gerald Dworkin Mar 1999

Devlin Was Right: Law And The Enforcement Of Morality, Gerald Dworkin

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Stevens's Professionalism And Ours, David Luban Oct 1996

Stevens's Professionalism And Ours, David Luban

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Triggering Coverage Of Progressive Property Loss: Preserving The Distinctions Between First- And Third-Party Insurance Policies, Chandra Lantz May 1994

Triggering Coverage Of Progressive Property Loss: Preserving The Distinctions Between First- And Third-Party Insurance Policies, Chandra Lantz

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Imposition, Richard Delgado, Jean Stefancic Mar 1994

Imposition, Richard Delgado, Jean Stefancic

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Word On Trial, Robin West Mar 1994

The Word On Trial, Robin West

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Scorn, Richard Delgado, Jean Stefancic Mar 1994

Scorn, Richard Delgado, Jean Stefancic

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Class, Personality, Contract, And Unconscionability, Jeffrey L. Harrison Feb 1994

Class, Personality, Contract, And Unconscionability, Jeffrey L. Harrison

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The National Flood Insurance Program: Unattained Purposes, Liability In Contract, And Takings, Charles T. Griffith Feb 1994

The National Flood Insurance Program: Unattained Purposes, Liability In Contract, And Takings, Charles T. Griffith

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Dna Fingerprinting: The Virginia Approach, James P. O'Brien Jr. Feb 1994

Dna Fingerprinting: The Virginia Approach, James P. O'Brien Jr.

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Harmless Error In Federal Habeas Corpus After Brecht V. Abrahamson, John H. Blume, Stephen P. Garvey Oct 1993

Harmless Error In Federal Habeas Corpus After Brecht V. Abrahamson, John H. Blume, Stephen P. Garvey

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


To Serve And Yet To Be Protected: The Unconstitutional Use Of Coerced Statements In Subsequent Criminal Proceedings Against Law Enforcement Officers, Andrew M. Herzig Oct 1993

To Serve And Yet To Be Protected: The Unconstitutional Use Of Coerced Statements In Subsequent Criminal Proceedings Against Law Enforcement Officers, Andrew M. Herzig

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Religiously Motivated "Outrageous" Conduct: Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress As A Weapon Against "Other People's Faiths", Paul T. Hayden Mar 1993

Religiously Motivated "Outrageous" Conduct: Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress As A Weapon Against "Other People's Faiths", Paul T. Hayden

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Environmental Litigation And Rule 11, Carl Tobias Feb 1992

Environmental Litigation And Rule 11, Carl Tobias

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Textualism, Constitutionalism, And Federal Statutes, Jerry L. Mashaw Apr 1991

Textualism, Constitutionalism, And Federal Statutes, Jerry L. Mashaw

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Translation As Argument, Mark V. Tushnet Oct 1990

Translation As Argument, Mark V. Tushnet

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Humor, Defamation And Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress: The Potential Predicament For Private Figure Plaintiffs, Catherine L. Amspacher, Randel Steven Springer Apr 1990

Humor, Defamation And Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Distress: The Potential Predicament For Private Figure Plaintiffs, Catherine L. Amspacher, Randel Steven Springer

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Does Section 524 (A)(2) Of The Bankruptcy Code Bar Criminal Prosecution Concerning Discharged Debts?, Kent A. Bieberich Apr 1988

Does Section 524 (A)(2) Of The Bankruptcy Code Bar Criminal Prosecution Concerning Discharged Debts?, Kent A. Bieberich

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Duty To Disclose And The Prisoner's Dilemma: Laidlaw V. Organ, Robert L. Birmingham Feb 1988

The Duty To Disclose And The Prisoner's Dilemma: Laidlaw V. Organ, Robert L. Birmingham

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


U.C.C. Methodology: Taking A Realistic Look At The Code, John L. Gedid Feb 1988

U.C.C. Methodology: Taking A Realistic Look At The Code, John L. Gedid

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Due Process Analysis Of The Impeachment Use Of Silence In Criminal Trials, Barbara Rook Snyder Feb 1988

A Due Process Analysis Of The Impeachment Use Of Silence In Criminal Trials, Barbara Rook Snyder

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Abusing Standing: Furthering The Conservative Agenda, David A. Domansky Feb 1988

Abusing Standing: Furthering The Conservative Agenda, David A. Domansky

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.