Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- New Deal (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Labor rights (1)
- Agency (1)
- Languages (1)
-
- Majority (1)
- Lanham Act (1)
- Health (1)
- Environmental law (1)
- Municipalities (1)
- Industrial terrorism (1)
- Popular sovereignty (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Cities (1)
- Adulthood (1)
- Contract (1)
- Credit (1)
- International trade (1)
- Labor relations (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Hybrid cars (1)
- Comity of nations (1)
- Energy law (1)
- Infancy (1)
- Green incentive programs (1)
- Energy Policy and Conservation Act (1)
- Doctrine of foreign equivalents (1)
- Credit Card (1)
- Fiduciary (1)
- International law (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Who Killed The Hybrid Car? State And Local Green Incentive Programs After Metropolitan Taxicab V. City Of New York, Jonathan Skinner
Who Killed The Hybrid Car? State And Local Green Incentive Programs After Metropolitan Taxicab V. City Of New York, Jonathan Skinner
Articles
Unnecessarily broad preemption ruling under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act discourages other states and municipalities from pursuing innovative, environmentally beneficial policies.
Overcoming Babel’S Curse: Adapting The Doctrine Of Foreign Equivalents, Jonathan Skinner
Overcoming Babel’S Curse: Adapting The Doctrine Of Foreign Equivalents, Jonathan Skinner
Articles
No abstract provided.
Industrial Terrorism And The Unmaking Of New Deal Labor Law, Ahmed A. White
Industrial Terrorism And The Unmaking Of New Deal Labor Law, Ahmed A. White
Articles
The passage of the Wagner (National Labor Relations) Act of 1935 represented an unprecedented effort to guarantee American workers basic labor rights--the rights to organize unions, to provoke meaningful collective bargaining, and to strike. Previous attempts by workers and government administrators to realize these rights in the workplace met with extraordinary, often violent, resistance from powerful industrial employers, whose repressive measures were described by government officials as a system of "industrial terrorism." Although labor scholars have acknowledged these practices and paid some attention to the way they initially frustrated labor rights and influenced the jurisprudence and politics of labor relations ...
Old Enough To Fight, Old Enough To Swipe: A Critique Of The Infancy Rule In The Federal Credit Card Act, Andrew A. Schwartz
Old Enough To Fight, Old Enough To Swipe: A Critique Of The Infancy Rule In The Federal Credit Card Act, Andrew A. Schwartz
Articles
In the 1960s and 1970s, American society came to the considered conclusion that if eighteen-year-olds can be drafted to fight and possibly die for their country, they should be treated as adults under the law. Thus, in 1971, the Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which lowered the voting age to eighteen from twenty one, was proposed and ratified in just three months, making it the fastest amendment in American history. The minimum age for federal and state jury service was also lowered to eighteen from twenty one. And, with regard to contract law, every state passed legislation reducing ...
Implementing American Health Care Reform: The Fiduciary Imperative, Dayna Bowen Matthew
Implementing American Health Care Reform: The Fiduciary Imperative, Dayna Bowen Matthew
Articles
The success of health reform under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 will depend upon the sustainability of a brand new and infrastructure of entities, relationships, and procedures. So far, neither jurists, legislators, policy-makers, providers, payers, nor patients have identified an organizing paradigm to implement or regulate this vast new infrastructure. Legal scholars have been curiously absent from this policy discussion, offering little if any insight into the role law plays beyond the familiar political debates about health reform. This article draws a legal chair to the table and takes a refined look at the legal basis ...