Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Federal Rules of Evidence (3)
- Due process (2)
- Evidence law (2)
- Presumptions (2)
- 358 U.S. 217 (1)
-
- Administrative Procedure Act (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative procedure (1)
- Admissibility of evidence (1)
- Advisory Committee notes (1)
- Agency rulemaking (1)
- American Indian law (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Burden of persuasion (1)
- Burden of proof (1)
- Case studies (1)
- Civil and criminal matters (1)
- Civil cases (1)
- Codification (1)
- Competency to stand trial (1)
- Congress (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Code Reform Act of 1977 (1)
- Criminal Procedure Advisory Committee (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Criminal responsibility (1)
- Defense counsel (1)
- Delegation doctrine (1)
- Department of Health Education and Welfare (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Congressional Control Of Administrative Regulation: A Study Of Legislative Vetoes, Harold H. Bruff, Ernest Gellhorn
Congressional Control Of Administrative Regulation: A Study Of Legislative Vetoes, Harold H. Bruff, Ernest Gellhorn
Publications
Several administrative programs contain provisions allowing Congress to veto agency rules, and there is now a bill before Congress to extend this veto power to all agency rulemaking. In this Article, Professor Bruff and Dean Gellhorn analyze the histories of five federal programs subject to the legislative veto to determine the effect of the veto on the rulemaking process and on the relationships between the branches of government. Extrapolating from this practical experience, they suggest that a general legislative veto is unlikely to increase the overall efficiency of the administrative process, may impede the achievement of reasoned decisionmaking based on …
Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi
Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi
Publications
No abstract provided.
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
American Indian Courts And Tribal Self-Government, Richard B. Collins, Ralph W. Johnson, Kathy Imig Perkins
American Indian Courts And Tribal Self-Government, Richard B. Collins, Ralph W. Johnson, Kathy Imig Perkins
Publications
No abstract provided.
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Foreword: Should Wyoming Adopt These Rules?, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
An Essay On The Determination Of Relevancy Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
An Essay On The Determination Of Relevancy Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Publications
The scope of the general definition of "relevant evidence" in the Federal Rules of Evidence is ambiguous. It is unclear whether Congress, for instance, intended that certain issues be considered legislatively determined or that those issues rest within the discretion of the courts. There is also some uncertainty over the definition's applicability to several types of evidence--particularly undisputed facts such as those that provide background information or are judicially admitted.