Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Anthropology (1)
- Borgers v. Belgium (1)
- Colonialism (1)
- Comparative tax law (1)
-
- Conflict of laws (1)
- Conseil d'Etat (1)
- Constitutional property clause (1)
- Cour de cassation (1)
- Courts (1)
- Dementia (1)
- Due Process (1)
- ECHR (1)
- Electoral design (1)
- Elite Institutionalism (1)
- Elites (1)
- Employment Practice (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- Feminism (1)
- French judicial practice (1)
- Fundamental Rights (1)
- German Constitutional Court (1)
- International Law (1)
- Judicial Activism (1)
- Judicial Decisionmaking (1)
- Judicial Power (1)
- Labor Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Law in India, India, Law in South Asia (1)
- Legal history (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Elite Institutionalism And Judicial Assertiveness In The Supreme Court Of India, Manoj Mate
Elite Institutionalism And Judicial Assertiveness In The Supreme Court Of India, Manoj Mate
Manoj S. Mate
Foreword: Transdisciplinary Conflicts Of Law, Ralf Michaels, Karen Knop, Annelise Riles
Foreword: Transdisciplinary Conflicts Of Law, Ralf Michaels, Karen Knop, Annelise Riles
Annelise Riles
This introduction to our co-edited special issue of Law and Contemporary Problems addresses how interdisciplinary studies might contribute to the revitalization of the field of Conflict of Laws. The introduction surveys existing approaches to interdisciplinarity in conflict of laws - drawn primarily from economics, political science, anthropology and sociology. It argues that most of these interdisciplinary efforts have remained internal to the law, relating conflicts to other legal spheres and issue areas. It summarizes some of the contributions of these projects but also outlines the ways they fall short of the full promise of interdisciplinary work in Conflicts scholarship, and …
The European Pasteurization Of French Law, Mitchel Lasser
The European Pasteurization Of French Law, Mitchel Lasser
Mitchel Lasser
In a series of stunning decisions handed down in the last few years, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has condemned the decisionmaking procedures traditionally used by the French Supreme Courts (i.e., the Cour de cassation and the Conseil d'Etat). This Article traces and critiques this developing “fair trial” jurisprudence, which has also resulted in the condemnation of the supreme courts of Belgium, Portugal, and the Netherlands, whose decisionmaking procedures were all patterned on the French civil law model. Finally, the Article examines the dramatic and schismatic French responses that have ensued.
This Article offers a case study at …
Property As A Fundamental Constitutional Right? The German Example, Gregory Alexander
Property As A Fundamental Constitutional Right? The German Example, Gregory Alexander
Gregory S Alexander
No abstract provided.
The Discursive Failure In Comparative Tax Law, Omri Marian
The Discursive Failure In Comparative Tax Law, Omri Marian
Omri Y Marian
Tax comparatists tend to bemoan the grim status of their chosen field. Complaints are aimed both at the scarcity of decent comparative legal tax scholarship, and at the lack of a theoretical foundation for the study of comparative tax law. The purpose of this Article is to portray a more sanguine, yet critical, view of this field. Sanguine, since a sympathetic reading of contemporary comparative tax scholarship demonstrates that there is more than enough such scholarship to generate a lively debate on comparative tax works and their methodologies. Critical, since all of these works fail to produce even the faintest …
Voting By Elderly Persons With Cognitive Impairment: Lessons From Other Democratic Nations, Jason Karlawish, Richard Bonnie
Voting By Elderly Persons With Cognitive Impairment: Lessons From Other Democratic Nations, Jason Karlawish, Richard Bonnie
Jason Karlawish
No abstract provided.
L'Estoppel Et La Protection De La Confiance Légitime: Eléments D'Un Renouveau Du Droit De La Responsabilité (Droit Anglais Et Droit Français), Olivier Moréteau
L'Estoppel Et La Protection De La Confiance Légitime: Eléments D'Un Renouveau Du Droit De La Responsabilité (Droit Anglais Et Droit Français), Olivier Moréteau
Olivier Moréteau
When studied in its historical dimension, the English doctrine of estoppel does not anymore appear like a rule of evidence but like a rule of substantive law. It precludes a person from denying a representation he has made whenever another person has been detrimentally relying on the truth of this representation. Estoppel can then be featured as a key concept taking place at the core of the law of obligations, together with the notions of tort, contract, and restitution. Within this province of the law, judges protect the reliance of parties reasonably acting on the faith of other parties’ conduct …
Protecting Workers As A Matter Of Principle: A Latin American View Of U.S. Work Law (With S. Gamonal C.), César Rosado Marzán
Protecting Workers As A Matter Of Principle: A Latin American View Of U.S. Work Law (With S. Gamonal C.), César Rosado Marzán
César F. Rosado Marzán
Scholars have noted that judicial conservatism has eroded labor and employment law (hereinafter referred to as “work law”) in the U.S. and elsewhere. The Roberts Court has kept in line with such conservatism, perhaps with sharpened audacity, deciding a number of key work law cases in the favor of employers. Moreover, the current seemingly pro-employer judicial hue over recent work law cases comes at the heels of recent legal scholarship calling for a rethinking of the “idea of labor law,” the demise of the standard employment contract, and an upsurge in labor precarity. Work law, which has always been under …
Conclusion — The Migration Of Legal Ideas: Legislative Design And The Lawmaking Process, Robert Tsai
Conclusion — The Migration Of Legal Ideas: Legislative Design And The Lawmaking Process, Robert Tsai
Robert L Tsai
This is the conclusion for an edited volume on legislative usage of foreign and international law, N. Lupo & L. Scaffardi, Legal Transplants and Parliaments: A Possible Dialogue Amongst Legislators? (2014). I assess the general turn in comparative law studies towards the behavior of elected officials, as well as the preference for increased formality in the use of foreign law. The essays in this book analyze the legal experiences of Brazil, Namibia, Australia, South Africa, Spain, the European Union, China, Canada, Portugal, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Italy. Many of these countries (but not all, especially the U.S.) …