Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- National security (55)
- Executive power (21)
- Qaida (Organization) (14)
- Counterterrorism (11)
- September 11 Terrorist Attacks 2001 (11)
-
- Terrorism--United States (11)
- Detention of persons (10)
- Intelligence service (9)
- Targeted killing (9)
- Geneva Conventions (1949) (8)
- National Security (8)
- Civil rights (7)
- Secret police (7)
- United States. Dept. of Justice. Office of Legal Counsel (7)
- War on Terrorism 2001-2009 -- Political aspects (7)
- Drone warfare (6)
- Habeas corpus (6)
- Lawyers--Malpractice (6)
- Police questioning (6)
- Combatants & noncombatants (International law) (5)
- Terrorists (5)
- War on Terrorism 2001-2009 -- Political aspects; National security (5)
- Japanese Americans (4)
- Military courts (4)
- Right of privacy (4)
- Terrorism (4)
- Torture (4)
- War on Terrorism 2001-2009 (4)
- CIA (3)
- Domestic terrorism (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 100
Full-Text Articles in Law
My Brother's Keeper: Using The Intelligence Toolbox On Domestic Terrorism, Brandon Carmack
My Brother's Keeper: Using The Intelligence Toolbox On Domestic Terrorism, Brandon Carmack
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cybersecurity In The Marine Transportation Sector: Protecting Intellectual Property To Keep Our Ports, Facilities, And Vessels Safe From Cyber Threats, Rachel Foote
Cybaris®
No abstract provided.
Notice And An Opportunity To Be Heard Before The President Kills You, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan
Notice And An Opportunity To Be Heard Before The President Kills You, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan
Faculty Scholarship
The United States identifies particular people as especially dangerous members of al Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces, and then kills them. Critics insist that this targeted killing is illegal; some go so far as to call it assassination. The drone strike that killed Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, generated furious criticism for purportedly violating his due process rights.
In spring 2013, President Obama responded in a wide-ranging speech on national security policy. On the topic of drones, he stated that terrorists are targeted only if they constitute “a continuing and imminent threat to the American people.” He announced that …
Responses To The Five Questions, Steven Metz
Responses To The Five Questions, Steven Metz
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, A. Mark Weisburd
Responses To The Five Questions, A. Mark Weisburd
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Jody M. Prescott
Responses To The Five Questions, Jody M. Prescott
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Charles J. Dunlop Jr.
Responses To The Five Questions, Charles J. Dunlop Jr.
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Formalism And The State Secrets Privilege, Sudha Setty
Judicial Formalism And The State Secrets Privilege, Sudha Setty
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Targeted Strikes: The Consequences Of Blurring The Armed Conflict And Self-Defense Justifications, Laurie R. Blank
Targeted Strikes: The Consequences Of Blurring The Armed Conflict And Self-Defense Justifications, Laurie R. Blank
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Uneasy Neighbors: Comparative American And Canadian Counter-Terrorism, Kent Roach
Uneasy Neighbors: Comparative American And Canadian Counter-Terrorism, Kent Roach
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, John Hursh
Responses To The Five Questions, John Hursh
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Norman Abrams
Responses To The Five Questions, Norman Abrams
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Harvey Rishikof, Bernard Horowitz
Responses To The Five Questions, Harvey Rishikof, Bernard Horowitz
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Secrecy, Transparency, And National Security, Lawrence Friedman, Victor Hansen
Secrecy, Transparency, And National Security, Lawrence Friedman, Victor Hansen
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Shane Harris
Responses To The Ten Questions, Shane Harris
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, James M. Rosenbaum
Responses To The Ten Questions, James M. Rosenbaum
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Tung Yin
Responses To The Ten Questions, Tung Yin
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Aziz Rana
Responses To The Ten Questions, Aziz Rana
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Robert D. Sloane
Responses To The Ten Questions, Robert D. Sloane
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, John Cary Sims
Responses To The Ten Questions, John Cary Sims
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Amos N. Guiora
Responses To The Ten Questions, Amos N. Guiora
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Interview With Edward B. Macmahon, Jr., Edward B. Macmahon Jr.
Interview With Edward B. Macmahon, Jr., Edward B. Macmahon Jr.
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unfortunate Advantage Of The Holyland People, Tomer Benito
The Unfortunate Advantage Of The Holyland People, Tomer Benito
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Policing Al Qaeda's Army Of Rhetorical Terrorists, Jarret Brachman
Policing Al Qaeda's Army Of Rhetorical Terrorists, Jarret Brachman
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Outside The Wire: American Exceptionalism And Counterinsurgency, David P. Fidler
Outside The Wire: American Exceptionalism And Counterinsurgency, David P. Fidler
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Measure Twice, Shoot Once: Higher Care For Cia-Targeted Killing, Afsheen John Radsan, Richard Murphy
Measure Twice, Shoot Once: Higher Care For Cia-Targeted Killing, Afsheen John Radsan, Richard Murphy
Faculty Scholarship
For almost a decade, the United States has deployed unmanned aerial vehicles, or "drones," to kill targeted members of Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) drone strikes in Pakistan have, in particular, stirred strong debates over the legality of such actions. Some commentators insist that these strikes are legal under international humanitarian law (IHL) or as a matter of self-defense. Others insist that the United States' targeted killing amounts to murder.
It is critical for the law to determine how to control killer drones and the future of warfare. As technology evolves, drones will develop sharper senses …
Responses To The Ten Questions, Eric Jensen
Responses To The Ten Questions, Eric Jensen
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Michael W. Lewis
Responses To The Ten Questions, Michael W. Lewis
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Richard Murphy
Responses To The Ten Questions, Richard Murphy
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Jordan J. Paust
Responses To The Ten Questions, Jordan J. Paust
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.