Law Commons^™

64/12/03 State Of Ohio V. Richard D. Chilton, Indictment (Chronology Of Events), Richard D. Chilton

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

No abstract provided.

64/10/28 Appeal By John Terry Defendant-Appellant (Law & Fact), Lee E. Skeel

Eighth Judicial District of Ohio, Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County

October 28, 1964 Motion by defendant appellant for stay of execution pending appeal granted. Motion for bail overruled.

64/10/19? Affidavit Of John W. Terry, John W. Terry

Eighth Judicial District of Ohio, Court of Appeals, Cuyahoga County

Affidavit stating John W. Terry doesn't have the money to defray a legal appeal on his behalf.

64/09/23 Illegal Search Ruling Is Due Today, Cleveland Plain Dealer

Newspaper Coverage

Reports that Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judge Bernard Friedman is expected to rule today on whether two men charged with carrying concealed weapons were searched legally. Richard Chilton and John Terry's attorney, Louis Stokes, asked that the case be dismissed because the police search of the men violated their constitutional rights.

64/09/23 Judge Upholds Police In Seach-Seize Arrest, Cleveland Press

Newspaper Coverage

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Bernard Friedman overruled the challenge, led by defense attorney Louis Stokes, to Detective Martin McFadden's search of John W. Terry and Richard Chilton. Judge Friedman suggested his decision be appealed, saying that there is no law in Ohio covering this situation and three states have laws on this subject. I strongly suggest you take this ruling to the Appellate Court to make the law clear to citizens and policemen."

64/09/22 Judge Bernard Friedman's Opinion In State V. Chilton And State V. Terry, Bernard Friedman

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

In the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Judge Bernard Friedman drew a distinction between "stop and frisk" and "search and seizure." This distinction was also recognized the U.S. Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio.

Judge Friedman wrote in his opinion:

"A search is primarily for the purpose of trying to obtain evidence in connection with the commission of a crime, that the police officer may reasonably believe that a crime has been committed or might be committed.

A frisking is strictly for the protection of the officer's person and his life. There was reasonable cause in this case …

64/09/22 Defendant's Bill Of Exceptions - Part 3, John T. Corrigan, Louis Stokes, Reuben M. Payne

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Part three of Defendant's Bill of Exceptions for State of Ohio v. John W. Terry and State of Ohio v. Richard D. Chilton. Appearances: John T. Corrigan and Reuben Payne for the State of Ohio and Louis Stokes for the Defendants.

64/09/22 Defendant's Bill Of Exceptions - Part 1, John T. Corrigan, Louis Stokes, Reuben M. Payne

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Defendant's Bill of Exceptions for State of Ohio v. John W. Terry and State of Ohio v. Richard D. Chilton. Appearances: John T. Corrigan and Reuben Payne for the State of Ohio and Louis Stokes for the Defendants.

64/09/22 Defendant's Bill Of Exceptions - Part 2, John T. Corrigan, Louis Stokes, Reuben M. Payne

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Part two of Defendant's Bill of Exceptions for State of Ohio v. John W. Terry and State of Ohio v. Richard D. Chilton. Appearances: John T. Corrigan and Reuben Payne for the State of Ohio and Louis Stokes for the Defendants.

64/09/22 Defendant's Bill Of Exceptions - Part 4, John T. Corrigan, Louis Stokes, Reuben M. Payne

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

Part four of Defendant's Bill of Exceptions for State of Ohio v. John W. Terry and State of Ohio v. Richard D. Chilton. Appearances: John T. Corrigan and Reuben Payne for the State of Ohio and Louis Stokes for the Defendants.

64/09/22 Illegal Search Is Charged At Concealed Weapons Trial, Cleveland Press

Newspaper Coverage

Reports that Defense Attorney Louis Stokes asked Common Pleas Court Judge Bernard Friedman to dismiss the concealed carry charges against John Terry and Richard Chilton on the grounds that Cleveland PD Detective Martin McFadden's search of the two men was illegal and violated their constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment.

64/05/12 Capias On Indictment For Carrying Concealed Weapons, John T. Corrigan

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas

No abstract provided.

Statute Of Frauds And Land Transactions, Brendan F. Brown

Cleveland State Law Review

The English Parliament enacted the Statute of Frauds in 1676 "for the prevention of many fraudulent practices which are commonly endeavoured to be upheld by perjury and subornation of perjury." It became effective the following year. These practices had become common as a result of the confusion, turmoil, and lawlessness which had accompanied and followed the English Civil War and the Restoration. They were peculiarly common in those categories of transactions which were included within the formalism prescribed by the Statute. Those categories related to land transactions, and to certain types of agreements involving personal property.

The Problem Of Group Defamation, Tom C. Clark

Cleveland State Law Review

It is my hope that the work of this symposium will contribute much to an understanding of the problems of group libel. But we cannot expect the judicial process to control such utterances. Heads get too hot and evil is too rampant. The final control must await the elimination of the three I's of this evil: Intolerance, Ignorance and Ignobility. They can be destroyed. They are not the inevitable results of increased social intercourse. They are not inherited- they are acquired. They cannot be legislated or decreed into the hearts and minds of men. It is for us- in the …

Hunting Accident Liability, Vincent A. Feudo

Cleveland State Law Review

Increased interest in hunting for pleasure has led to an increased number of mishaps. Recent statistics show one injury for every 7,800 hunters, with one in every five or six fatal. From early to more recent cases it has generally been held that where one is not negligent in the handling of his weapon he is not liable. But "ordinary care" while hunting means a high degree of care, due to the inherent nature of the sport.

New Questions On Legal Education, R. B. Amandes, Edgar Bodenheimer, Sheldon D. Elliott, Ray Forrester

Cleveland State Law Review

Periodically, Cleveland-Marshall Law Review asks prominent legal educators for their views on current problems in legal education. Here are the responses to our most recent survey. The comments are not intended to be comprehensive or definitive, but they reflect significant attitudes of outstanding scholars on important educational issues.

Diseases Of Obscure Etiology: Legal Aspects, Paul D. Rheingold

Cleveland State Law Review

The purpose of this note is to gather and analyze legal cases which have involved diseases characterized by the courts or medical witnesses as being of obscure etiology or in which the role of trauma is uncertain. Basic to this discussion is an understanding of the concepts of causation, precipitation and aggravation as they are used both legally and medically.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Chambers: Medicolegal Aspects, Carl E. Wasmuth, John Homi

Cleveland State Law Review

The installation and utilization of the hyperbaric facility for the administration of oxygen to patients under increased atmospheric pressures presents several legal problems.

Group Defamation In The U. S. A., James Jay Brown, Carl L. Stern

Cleveland State Law Review

The difficulties faced by the group defamation victim are obvious on paper and terrifying in reality. In merely defending his reputation, he is confronted by unprovable issues and, as will be pointed out, is bludgeoned in court by a history of "rational-reasonable" civil and criminal precedents. A brief outline of this paradox is set out here, but the question still remains whether the civil-common law or our legislatures have an answer to this unbelievable legal .

Fraud In Realty Transactions, David S. Lake

Cleveland State Law Review

In real estate transactions, the law will protect the innocent, unwary, and sometimes stupid, buyer from fraud, misrepresentation and deceit. This article presents a summary of that law, categorized according to the specific matter misrepresented (i.e., misrepresentations of value, income, size or quantity, and condition or quality).

Statute Of Limitations In Malpractice Actions, Ernest A. Cieslinski

Cleveland State Law Review

The ill-treated patient has sought redress for medical malpractice by actions that sound in tort, in contract, or in fraud. As with other actions, the underlying policy of "peace and repose" of all statutes of limitations dictates that these actions be timely. In Ohio, for example, the time limit for an action for malpractice is one year.

Malpractice In Dental Anesthesiology, Allen L. Perry

Cleveland State Law Review

Cases invovlving dental anesthesia reveal that breaches of the duty to use proper skill and care have occurred in selection of the type of anesthetic, method of administration, failure to examine the patient, use of unsterile instruments, failure to use safety devices, and failure to properly care for patients under the influence of anesthesia. Persons practicing dental anesthesiology, like those pracing medicine and surgery, must be duly able and careful. This rule is elementary and is founded on considerations of public policy. Whenever the behavior of a dentist or dental anesthesiologist has been of a nature such that a dereliction …

Finger-Tip Injuries, D. C. Robertson

Cleveland State Law Review

Finger-tip injuries are among the most common injuries which have to be dealt with in emergency departments.They present a variety of problems which can be treated in different ways. This paper will present a variety of these injuries and discuss the treatment of each of them.

Court Of Justice Of The European Communities, Frans Van Heemstra, Guy Suermondt

Cleveland State Law Review

The decisions of the Court under the Rome Treaty cover only a period of two years and any conclusions must therefore be cautious. One can discern, however, a tendency, continuing the trend under the ECCS Treaty, to strengthen the legal structure of the European Community by forcefully sustaining the applicable Treaty provisions and the measures of its Institutions both as to the duties created thereunder and the personal rights that may be derived therefrom. On the other hand, the Court has not hesitated to use its powers for the protection of the subjects of the Community against illegal conduct of …

Deportation Law And The Social Interest, George Liviola Jr.

Cleveland State Law Review

Fundamental civil and humanitarian rights are being denied to individuals in the United States because American courts cling to stare decisis in denaturalization and deportation proceedings. This article concerns itself with an examination of this policy, its history, progress, effect and possible reform.

Stare Decisis In The F.E.L.A., Harry G. Fuerst

Cleveland State Law Review

The general doctrine on stare decisis is that when a court has once laid down a principle of law as applicable to a certain set of facts, it will adhere to that principle and apply it to all future cases, where the facts are substantially the same. Congress on August 11, 1939, amended the Federal Employers Liability Act, and by the sweep of the President's pen the old and archaic defense of assumption of risk was completely eliminated from the Act.

Book Review, William K. Gardner

Cleveland State Law Review

Reviewing Melvin Block, ed., The Art of Summation, New York State Association of Trial Lawyers, 1963

Group Defamation In The Netherlands, W. H. Bijleveld

Cleveland State Law Review

In this paper we shall discuss the ways in which Dutch law protects against group defamation.

Defenses To Group Defamation Actions, Richard J. Quigg

Cleveland State Law Review

The basic defenses applicable to ordinary individual defamation, of truth, privilege (including fair comment), and consent, also apply to group defamation. Most past group defamation cases have held that language including all members of a given group,or positively identifying the plaintiff, must be used. Tort actions have been upheld when small groups are defamed; tort claims are generally disallowed in the defamation of large groups unless the public readily recognizes the defamation as being directed at one individual. A number of "group-hate" statutes have been enacted by various states, making it a criminal offense to defame a class of citizens. …

The Fright Peddlers, Thomas H. Kuchel

Cleveland State Law Review

Senator Kuchel from California authorized the Editors of this Law Review to publish, as his contribution to this Symposium, extracts from his address to Congress as reported in the Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 88th Congress, First Session; Vol. 10g, No. 79; May 28, 1963. This article is, in effect, a brief digest of that address.