Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Jury Selection (2)
- Administration of Criminal Justice (1)
- Authority (1)
- Bail (1)
- Capital Punishment (1)
-
- Competency to Stand Trial (1)
- Criminal Justice System (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Imprisonment (1)
- Juries (1)
- Jury (1)
- Jury Selection – Cross-section Requirement (1)
- Mentally Ill Persons (1)
- Physically Disabled Persons (1)
- Public Records (1)
- Race Discrimination (1)
- Sentences (1)
- Sentencing Guidelines (1)
- Transparency in Government (1)
- United States (1)
- United States Constitution 18th Amendment (1)
- Wythe Lecture (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Too Ill To Be Killed: Mental And Physical Competency To Be Executed Pursuant To The Death Penalty, Linda A. Malone
Too Ill To Be Killed: Mental And Physical Competency To Be Executed Pursuant To The Death Penalty, Linda A. Malone
Faculty Publications
Mentally ill individuals are being housed in prisons and jails throughout the country. Due to decreased funding and overpopulation of correctional facilities, individuals with pre-existing illnesses, as well as others who develop illnesses, are in severe need of mental health services and punished for their ailments through the use of solitary confinement, long prison sentences, and lack of care. The stress created by such conditions is amplified for mentally ill prisoners who are awaiting execution or the dismissal of their death row sentences. These individuals must show that they are competent to stand trial, exhibit the mental state required for …
A First Step Towards Sentencing Reform, Jeffrey Bellin
A First Step Towards Sentencing Reform, Jeffrey Bellin
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Whom Should We Punish, And How? Rational Incentives And Criminal Justice Reform, Keith N. Hylton
Whom Should We Punish, And How? Rational Incentives And Criminal Justice Reform, Keith N. Hylton
William & Mary Law Review
This Article sets out a comprehensive account of rational punishment theory and examines its implications for criminal law reform. Specifically, what offenses should be subjected to criminal punishment, and how should we punish? Should we use prison sentences or fines, and when should we use them? Should some conduct be left to a form of market punishment through private lawsuits? Should fines be used to fund the criminal justice system? The answers I offer address some of the most important public policy issues of the moment, such as mass incarceration and the use of fines to finance law enforcement. The …
Following Oregon’S Trail: Implementing Automatic Voter Registration To Provide For Improved Jury Representation In The United States, Julie A. Cascino
Following Oregon’S Trail: Implementing Automatic Voter Registration To Provide For Improved Jury Representation In The United States, Julie A. Cascino
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reassessing Prosecutorial Power Through The Lens Of Mass Incarceration, Jeffrey Bellin
Reassessing Prosecutorial Power Through The Lens Of Mass Incarceration, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Legitimacy, Authority, And The Right To Affordable Bail, Colin Starger, Michael Bullock
Legitimacy, Authority, And The Right To Affordable Bail, Colin Starger, Michael Bullock
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Bail reform is hot. Over the past two years, jurisdictions around the country have moved to limit or end money bail practices that discriminate against the poor. Although cheered on by many, bail reform is vehemently opposed by the powerful bail-bond industry. In courts around the country, lawyers representing this industry have argued that reform is unnecessary, and even unconstitutional. One particularly insidious argument advanced by bail-bond apologists is that a “wall of authority” supports the proposition that “bail is not excessive merely because the defendant is unable to pay it.” In other words, authority rejects the right to affordable …
The Jury Sunshine Project: Jury Selection Data As A Political Issue, Ronald F. Wright, Kami Chavis, Gregory S. Parks
The Jury Sunshine Project: Jury Selection Data As A Political Issue, Ronald F. Wright, Kami Chavis, Gregory S. Parks
Faculty Publications
In this Article, the authors look at jury selection from the viewpoint of citizens and voters, standing outside the limited boundaries of constitutional challenges. They argue that the composition of juries in criminal cases deserves political debate outside the courtroom. Voters should use the jury selection habits of judges and prosecutors to assess the overall health of local criminal justice: local conditions are unhealthy when the full-time courtroom professionals build juries that exclude parts of the local community, particularly when they exclude members of traditionally marginalized groups such as racial minorities. Every sector of society should participate in the administration …