Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

2000

Law and Society

University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law

Keyword
Publication

Articles 1 - 16 of 16

Full-Text Articles in Law

Tv Or Not Tv: The Telecast Of Appellate Arguments In Pennsylvania, Stephen J. Mcewen Jul 2000

Tv Or Not Tv: The Telecast Of Appellate Arguments In Pennsylvania, Stephen J. Mcewen

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

The Pennsylvania Superior Court began televising en banc oral arguments. The reception of this practice has been extremely positive. The essay discusses the development of televising oral arguments in Pennsylvania’s Superior Court.


Battered-Child Syndrome: Is It A Paradigm For A Child Of Embattled Divorce?, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Michael W. Mellon Ph.D., Beth O. Butler L.C.S.W., Suzanne E. Stroh R.N.P., Nicholas Long Ph.D., Jerry G. Jones M.D. Apr 2000

Battered-Child Syndrome: Is It A Paradigm For A Child Of Embattled Divorce?, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Michael W. Mellon Ph.D., Beth O. Butler L.C.S.W., Suzanne E. Stroh R.N.P., Nicholas Long Ph.D., Jerry G. Jones M.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Challenge To Rural States Of Procedural Reform In High Conflict Custody Cases, Elizabeth Barker Brandt J.D. Apr 2000

The Challenge To Rural States Of Procedural Reform In High Conflict Custody Cases, Elizabeth Barker Brandt J.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Evolving Judicial Role In Child Custody Disputes: From Fault Finder To Conflict Manager To Differential Case Management, Andrew Schepard J.D. Apr 2000

The Evolving Judicial Role In Child Custody Disputes: From Fault Finder To Conflict Manager To Differential Case Management, Andrew Schepard J.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Building Multidisciplinary Professional Partnerships With The Court Of Behalf Of High-Conflict Divorcing Families And Their Children: Who Needs What Kind Of Help, Janet R. Johnston Ph.D. Apr 2000

Building Multidisciplinary Professional Partnerships With The Court Of Behalf Of High-Conflict Divorcing Families And Their Children: Who Needs What Kind Of Help, Janet R. Johnston Ph.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Comprehensive Child Custody Evaluation—Ten Years Later, Robert L. Halon Ph.D. Apr 2000

The Comprehensive Child Custody Evaluation—Ten Years Later, Robert L. Halon Ph.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Prevention Strategies To Protect Professionals And Families Involved In High-Conflict Divorce, Thomas E. Schact Psy.D. Apr 2000

Prevention Strategies To Protect Professionals And Families Involved In High-Conflict Divorce, Thomas E. Schact Psy.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Child Maltreatment And Endangerment In The Context Of Divorce, Kathleen Coulborn Faller Ph.D. Apr 2000

Child Maltreatment And Endangerment In The Context Of Divorce, Kathleen Coulborn Faller Ph.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Guardian Ad Litem In Custody And Conflict Cases: Investigator, Champion, And Referee, Dana E. Prescott J.D. Apr 2000

The Guardian Ad Litem In Custody And Conflict Cases: Investigator, Champion, And Referee, Dana E. Prescott J.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Qualifications Of The Techniques To Be Used By Judges, Attorneys, And Mental Health Professionals Who Deal The Children In High Conflict Divorce Cases, Barry Bricklin Ph.D., Gail Elliott Ph.D. Apr 2000

Qualifications Of The Techniques To Be Used By Judges, Attorneys, And Mental Health Professionals Who Deal The Children In High Conflict Divorce Cases, Barry Bricklin Ph.D., Gail Elliott Ph.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Professionals' Perceptions Of Divorce Involving Children, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Pippa Simpson Ph.D., Trevor Gage M.D., Kim Worley M.D. Apr 2000

Professionals' Perceptions Of Divorce Involving Children, H. Patrick Stern M.D., Pippa Simpson Ph.D., Trevor Gage M.D., Kim Worley M.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Family Law—Petitions To Change A Minor Child's Surname: Arkansas Supreme Court Adopts "Clearly Erroneous" Standard Of Review And Establishes Six-Factor Test. Huffman V. Fisher, 337 Ark. 58, 987 S.W.2d 269 (1999)., Luke Zakrzewski Apr 2000

Family Law—Petitions To Change A Minor Child's Surname: Arkansas Supreme Court Adopts "Clearly Erroneous" Standard Of Review And Establishes Six-Factor Test. Huffman V. Fisher, 337 Ark. 58, 987 S.W.2d 269 (1999)., Luke Zakrzewski

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Contentious Divorce: The Rocky Path To The Child's Best Interests, Michael S. Jellinek M.D., Kate Erwin M.D., Alexa Bagnell M.D. Apr 2000

Contentious Divorce: The Rocky Path To The Child's Best Interests, Michael S. Jellinek M.D., Kate Erwin M.D., Alexa Bagnell M.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


In The Best Interest Of The Child: A Commentary, Lawrence H. Diller M.D. Apr 2000

In The Best Interest Of The Child: A Commentary, Lawrence H. Diller M.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Promoting The Best Interests Of Children Whose Parents Are Divorcing: The Next Steps For Arkansas, Kenneth S. Gallant J.D. Apr 2000

Promoting The Best Interests Of Children Whose Parents Are Divorcing: The Next Steps For Arkansas, Kenneth S. Gallant J.D.

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.


Agenda Setting In The Courts Of Appeals: The Effect Of Ideology On En Banc Rehearings, Phil Zarone Jan 2000

Agenda Setting In The Courts Of Appeals: The Effect Of Ideology On En Banc Rehearings, Phil Zarone

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

Intermediate appellate courts hear whatever case is brought before them on appeal. Therefore, the courts are unable to set an agenda through selecting which cases to hear. Appellate courts may be able to set an agenda, though, through en banc rehearings. This article discusses how courts of appeals decide when to grant en banc proceedings and the effect of ideological use of en banc rehearings.