Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (554)
- Selected Works (464)
- University of Michigan Law School (447)
- SelectedWorks (300)
- University of Richmond (215)
-
- University of San Diego (208)
- American University Washington College of Law (189)
- BLR (144)
- Seattle University School of Law (136)
- Universitas Indonesia (122)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (102)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (95)
- DePaul University (91)
- Columbia Law School (74)
- Georgetown University Law Center (65)
- Fordham Law School (63)
- Singapore Management University (63)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (62)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (56)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (51)
- Cornell University Law School (43)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (39)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (38)
- University of Georgia School of Law (37)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (35)
- Brooklyn Law School (33)
- Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan (33)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (27)
- University of Maine School of Law (26)
- Pepperdine University (25)
- Keyword
-
- Public Law and Legal Theory (335)
- Law and Society (178)
- Constitutional Law (169)
- Jurisprudence (167)
- Politics (125)
-
- Legislation (113)
- Constitutional law (107)
- Law and Economics (103)
- Criminal law (91)
- Regulation (87)
- Constitution (83)
- Courts (80)
- Administrative law (76)
- General Law (75)
- International law (74)
- Democracy (73)
- Law (73)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (72)
- International Law (70)
- Human Rights Law (69)
- Economics (63)
- Federalism (62)
- Legal theory (56)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (55)
- Human rights (54)
- Judges (54)
- Legal History (53)
- Administrative Law (50)
- Discrimination (49)
- Separation of powers (49)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (555)
- Articles (205)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (177)
- Richmond Public Interest Law Review (175)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (175)
-
- Michigan Law Review (167)
- ExpressO (131)
- Faculty Scholarship (131)
- Seattle University Law Review (128)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (122)
- Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (107)
- DePaul Journal for Social Justice (90)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (63)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (61)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (52)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (47)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (40)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (38)
- Law & Economics Working Papers (37)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (36)
- Review of law sciences (33)
- Donald J. Kochan (31)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (30)
- Hou Meng (29)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (27)
- Richard Adelstein (26)
- Touro Law Review (24)
- Book Chapters (23)
- Fordham Law Review (23)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (22)
Articles 3361 - 3390 of 4466
Full-Text Articles in Law
Foia Anniversary Display, St. Mary's University, Texas
Foia Anniversary Display, St. Mary's University, Texas
Democracy/Government
Bibliography and photographs of a display of government documents from St. Mary's University, Texas.
The Third Death Of Federalism, A. Christopher Bryant
The Third Death Of Federalism, A. Christopher Bryant
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Federal drug laws proved a stumbling block to the Rehnquist Court's attempted federalism revival. In its final year, the Court's fragile federalism coalition splintered in a pair of cases arising under the Controlled Substances Act ("CSA"). Missing from the emerging legal literature concerning those two decisions is any substantive discussion of the Supreme Court's much earlier, ill-fated efforts to preserve both judicial enforcement of the enumerated powers doctrine and federal narcotics laws. This article fills that gap.
Ninety-odd years ago the Court arrived at the same jurisprudential juncture it now confronts. In the early decades of the twentieth century, the …
Justice, And Only Justice, You Shall Pursue: Network Neutrality, The First Amendment And John Rawls's Theory Of Justice, Amit M. Schejter, Moran Yemini
Justice, And Only Justice, You Shall Pursue: Network Neutrality, The First Amendment And John Rawls's Theory Of Justice, Amit M. Schejter, Moran Yemini
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
As broadband becomes the public's technology of choice to access the Internet, it is also emerging as the battlefield upon which the struggle for control of the Internet is being fought. Operators who provide physical access to the service claim the right to discriminate among the content providers who use the infrastructure in which the operators have invested. In contrast, content providers warn that exercising such a policy would "undermine the principles that have made the Internet such a success."[...] For academic observers, analysis of this issue has thus far been confined to the areas of property law, innovation, and …
Putting The "Public" Back Into Public-Private Partnerships For Economic Development, Audrey Mcfarlane
Putting The "Public" Back Into Public-Private Partnerships For Economic Development, Audrey Mcfarlane
All Faculty Scholarship
Public-Private Partnerships are viewed quite positively. In the context of working with local government for economic development, the interests and concerns of the private appear to dominate the development decision-making. This Essay explores eminent domain decisions and community benefits agreements for standards for measuring the efficacy of these partnerships. It suggests ways in which we can begin to think about public accountability and public benefits to be derived from these partnerships.
Corégulation Et Responsabilité Sociale Des Entreprises, Gregory Lewkowicz, Ludovic Hennebel
Corégulation Et Responsabilité Sociale Des Entreprises, Gregory Lewkowicz, Ludovic Hennebel
Gregory Lewkowicz
This paper analyses the evolution of corporate social responsibility from an empirical and a theoretical point of view. After having described the framework of a theory of coregulation, the authors scrutinize the main regulatory instruments used in the context of corporate social responsibility. They demonstrate that the evolution of corporate social responsaibility delineates a new regulatory logic peculiar to a globalizing legal world. The paper concludes stating that this logic could be a paradigm for the study of an emerging global law.
From Human Rights To Fundamental Rights: On The Consequences Of A Conceptual Distinction, Gianluigi Palombella
From Human Rights To Fundamental Rights: On The Consequences Of A Conceptual Distinction, Gianluigi Palombella
Gianluigi Palombella
This article introduces a peculiar distinction between "human" rights and "fundamental" rights, explaining through diverse areas, the role that the difference can play. Rights are loaded with contrasting properties and burdens, opposing features and values (neutral, pre-political, negotiable, democratic, etc.). On the contrary, we should accept - on one side - human rights as moral visions of what is due to human beings, deontological imperatives, even if abstract. But on the other side we cannot ignore the ethical problems: e.g. those resulting from their blind implementation. We need to enhance the institutional, legal and ethical-political meaning of "fundamental" rights, i.e. …
Rights As Norms And As Ends, Gianluigi Palombella
Rights As Norms And As Ends, Gianluigi Palombella
Gianluigi Palombella
This article considers the narratives of law through the lens of the form-substance devide. Different legal theories have provided for opposite definitions of law, legal rules and individual rights, enhancing their identity as due to some substantive content or, on the contrary, to some formal-functional features. The form-substance antinomy reflects both institutional and theoretical reasons. It bears down on the relations envisaged among rights, norms and ends. Different conceptions of rights are best understood as a special articulation of those three terms, and offer different patterns for rights, depending on their relation-opposition with collective ends, ethical values, legislation. The following …
Reasons For Justice, Rights And Future Generations, Gianluigi Palombella
Reasons For Justice, Rights And Future Generations, Gianluigi Palombella
Gianluigi Palombella
This article focuses on some very "fundamental threats" to future generations' leaving, and considers whether most essential interests of future persons not to be harmed can be construed as rights, and in particular as human rights, as much as present persons'. The framework refers essentially to a conceptual grammar of justice. Moreover, it is suggested to articulate rights through the lens of "disposability" and "non-disposability" principles. Finally, the article shows the reasons for separating what we owe to future persons under the challenge of those threats for humanity, i.e. a matter of justice, from our right to hand down our …
Calling For Stories, Nancy Levit, Allen Rostron
Calling For Stories, Nancy Levit, Allen Rostron
Nancy Levit
Storytelling is a fundamental part of legal practice, teaching, and thought. Telling stories as a method of practicing law reaches back to the days of the classical Greek orators. Before legal education became an academic matter, the apprenticeship system for training lawyers consisted of mentoring and telling war stories. As the law and literature movement evolved, it sorted itself into three strands: law in literature, law as literature, and storytelling. The storytelling branch blossomed.
Over the last few decades, storytelling became a subject of enormous interest and controversy within the world of legal scholarship. Law review articles appeared in the …
The Insecurity Of Trafficking In International Law, Gregor Noll
The Insecurity Of Trafficking In International Law, Gregor Noll
Gregor Noll
The present chapter inquires into to the definition of trafficking in the 2000 Trafficking Protocol. The concept of trafficking seems to offer a self-evident point of departure to broach inequality and migration in the international domain. It emphasises the inequality between trafficker and the trafficked person, and States task themselves to side with the latter - and weaker - party in that relationship. Other dimensions of inequality, as that between migrants and States, are removed from the limelight of trafficking language. Trafficking of human beings is distinct from human smuggling: while trafficking is about non-consensual and exploitative relations between the …
Public Power And Private Purpose: Odious Debt And The Political Economy Of Hegemony, Deborah M. Weissman, Louis A. Pérez Jr.
Public Power And Private Purpose: Odious Debt And The Political Economy Of Hegemony, Deborah M. Weissman, Louis A. Pérez Jr.
Deborah M. Weissman
This Article examines the process by which overlapping interests between private bankers and government translates into influence and power mediated through the use of bank loans as instruments of foreign policy. The article suggests the market transactions often act as a matter of U.S. interests. It makes use of historical narratives not only as means to document the origins of the Odious Debt doctrine, but also to demonstrate the complexity attending efforts to create an Odious Debt doctrine that might function in law. The International Lending Supervision Act, the Baker plan and Brady initiative - policies reinforced through legal interpretations, …
Spotlight On Public Interest Attorneys, Janelle Skaloud
Spotlight On Public Interest Attorneys, Janelle Skaloud
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Dedication To Chesterfield H. Smith, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Dedication To Chesterfield H. Smith, Ruth Bader Ginsburg
University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy
No abstract provided.
Cumberland County Jail 2005 Pre-Arraignments, George Shaler Mph
Cumberland County Jail 2005 Pre-Arraignments, George Shaler Mph
Maine Statistical Analysis Center
This brief addresses the following questions: 1. What do we know about bookings of arrested persons at the Cumberland County Jail? 2. What do we know about pre-arraignment bookings by Cumberland County law enforcement agencies? In 2006, Cumberland County hired the Muskie School of Public Service to help provide information for county planning purposes. The Muskie School examined the rates of all bookings¹ (including pre-arraignment bookings) originated by all county law enforcement agencies to the jail in 2005.
Over the last ten years the average population in county jails has increased dramatically in Maine. In 2003, the total in-house population …
Suppose The Schindlers Had Won The Schiavo Case, Alan Meisel
Suppose The Schindlers Had Won The Schiavo Case, Alan Meisel
Articles
In this Article, I will identify and discuss the harms that would have occurred had the Schindlers won the Schiavo Case - the harms both to Terri Schiavo in the private case and the larger set of harms to public policy in the public case. The Schindlers fought Michael Schiavo on a variety of battlegrounds - the Florida courts, the Florida legislative and executive branches, the federal courts, and eventually Congress. Had they definitively prevailed in any of these forums, the consequences for end-of-life decisionmaking would have been largely the same. Had they prevailed in Congress or even in the …
Banning Smoking In Chicago's Social Scene: Protecting Labor And Broadening Public Health Policy, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2007), Adrienne Detanico
Banning Smoking In Chicago's Social Scene: Protecting Labor And Broadening Public Health Policy, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2007), Adrienne Detanico
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Curing The Bop Plague With Booker: Addressing Inadequate Medical Treatment In The Bureau Of Prisons, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 219 (2007), Natalie Hinton
Curing The Bop Plague With Booker: Addressing Inadequate Medical Treatment In The Bureau Of Prisons, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 219 (2007), Natalie Hinton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fair Use Harbors, Gideon Parchomovsky, Kevin A. Goldman
Fair Use Harbors, Gideon Parchomovsky, Kevin A. Goldman
All Faculty Scholarship
The doctrine of fair use was originally intended to facilitate those socially optimal uses of copyrighted material that would otherwise constitute infringement. Yet the application of the law has become so unpredictable that would-be fair-users can rarely rely on the doctrine with any significant level of confidence. Moreover, the doctrine provides no defense for those seeking to make fair uses of material protected by anti-circumvention measures. As a result, artists working in media both new and old are unable to derive from copyrighted works the full value to which the public is entitled. In this Essay, we propose a solution …
Social Security And Government Deficits: When Should We Worry?, Neil H. Buchanan
Social Security And Government Deficits: When Should We Worry?, Neil H. Buchanan
UF Law Faculty Publications
In this Article, I critically examine the assumption that the Social Security system faces a financing crisis and that the government can avert the crisis only by acting now to cut benefits or to raise taxes. The best conclusion we can draw from the current evidence is that the system is not doomed and that it is not necessary to institute immediate changes. We should, of course, continue to monitor the situation closely to determine whether future changes become necessary. This conclusion is further strengthened by the likelihood that any changes the government makes to the Social Security system today …
Judicial Review Of Thirteenth Amendment Legislation: 'Congruence And Proportionality' Or 'Necessary And Proper'?, William M. Carter Jr.
Judicial Review Of Thirteenth Amendment Legislation: 'Congruence And Proportionality' Or 'Necessary And Proper'?, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
The Thirteenth Amendment has relatively recently been rediscovered by scholars and litigants as a source of civil rights protections. Most of the scholarship focuses on judicial enforcement of the Amendment in lawsuits brought by individuals. However, scholars have paid relatively little attention as of late to the proper scope of congressional action enforcing the Amendment. The reason, presumably, is that it is fairly well settled that Congress enjoys very broad authority to determine what constitutes either literal slavery or, to use the language of Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., a "badge or incident of slavery" falling within the Amendment's …
Truth, Deterrence, And The Impeachment Exception , James L. Kainen
Truth, Deterrence, And The Impeachment Exception , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
James v. Illinois permits illegally-obtained evidence to impeach defendants, but not defense witnesses. Thus far, all courts have construed James to allow impeachment of defendants' hearsay declarations. This article argues against allowing illegally-obtained evidence to impeach defendants' hearsay declarations because doing so unduly diminishes the exclusionary rule's deterrent effect. The distinction between impeaching defendants and defense witnesses disappears when courts allow prosecutors to impeach defendants' hearsay declarations. Because defense witnesses report exculpatory conduct of a defendant who always has a substantial interest in disguising his criminality, their testimony routinely incorporates defendant hearsay. Defense witness testimony thus routinely paves the way …
Race, Rights, And The Thirteenth Amendment: Defining The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery, William M. Carter Jr.
Race, Rights, And The Thirteenth Amendment: Defining The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery, William M. Carter Jr.
Articles
The Supreme Court has held that the Thirteenth Amendment prohibits slavery or involuntary servitude and also empowers Congress to end any lingering "badges and incidents of slavery." The Court, however, has failed to provide any guidance as to defining the badges and incidents of slavery when Congress has failed to identify a condition or form of discrimination as such. This has led the lower courts to conclude that the judiciary's role under the Thirteenth Amendment is limited to enforcing only the Amendment's prohibition of literal enslavement.
This article has two primary objectives. First, it offers an interpretive framework for defining …
Do You See What I See - Reflections On How Bias Infiltrates The New York City Family Court - The Case Of The Court Ordered Investigation, Leah A. Hill
Faculty Scholarship
That the Family Court is ill-equipped to address the needs of the hundreds of thousands of cases handled therein is not news. Exploding caseloads, complex problems, and minimal resources are just a few of the ingredients that combine to undermine the Court's ability to fulfill its promise. What has been given less attention until very recently is the extent to which the Family Court's failures disproportionately impact low-income families of color. Any analysis of the Court's impact or efficacy must consider the context I have described in my observations of the Court- the images of black and brown litigants hurrying …
The Promise And Perils Of Credit Derivatives, Frank Partnoy, David A. Skeel Jr.
The Promise And Perils Of Credit Derivatives, Frank Partnoy, David A. Skeel Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
In this Article, we begin what we believe will be a fruitful area of scholarly inquiry: an in-depth analysis of credit derivatives. We survey the benefits and risks of credit derivatives, particularly as the use of these instruments affect the role of banks and other creditors in corporate governance. We also hope to create a framework for a more general scholarly discussion of credit derivatives. We define credit derivatives as financial instruments whose payoffs are linked in some way to a change in credit quality of an issuer or issuers. Our research suggests that there are two major categories of …
Rethinking Customary Law In Tribal Court Jurisprudence, Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rethinking Customary Law In Tribal Court Jurisprudence, Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Customary law still appears in many of the decisions of American state and federal courts. Modern courts rely less on customary law, part and parcel of the English common law adopted and adapted by the Founders of the United States, with statutory and administrative law dominating the field. In contrast, the importance of customary law in American Indian tribal courts cannot be understated. Indian tribes now take every measure conceivable to preserve Indigenous cultures and restore lost cultural knowledge and practices. Tribal court litigation, especially litigation involving tribal members and issues arising out of tribal law, often turns on the …
Partially Odious Debts?, Omri Ben-Shahar, Mitu Gulati
Partially Odious Debts?, Omri Ben-Shahar, Mitu Gulati
Articles
The despotic ruler of a poor nation borrows extensively from foreign creditors. He spends some of those funds on building statues of himself, others on buying arms for his brutal secret police, and he places the remainder in his personal bank accounts in Switzerland. The longer the despot stays in power, the poorer the nation becomes. Although the secret police are able to keep prodemocracy protests subdued by force for many years, eventually there is a popular revolt. The despot flees the scene with a few billion dollars of his illgotten gains. The populist regime that replaces the despot now …
Can There Be A Theory Of Law?, Joseph Raz
Can There Be A Theory Of Law?, Joseph Raz
Faculty Scholarship
The paper deals with the possibility of a theory of the nature of law as such, a theory which will be necessarily true of all law. It explores the relations between explanations of concepts and of the things they are concepts of, the possibility that the law has essential properties, and the possibility that the law changes its nature over time, and that what is law at a given place and time depends on the culture and concepts of that place and time. It also considers the possibility of understanding the institutions, such as the law, of cultures whose concepts …
Public-Private Health Law: Multiple Directions In Public Health, Nan D. Hunter
Public-Private Health Law: Multiple Directions In Public Health, Nan D. Hunter
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
No public law is more public than public health law. Its defining subject is the use of state power to control and prevent death and disease. Its primary institutions are a cluster of state actors, the governmental agencies that comprise the American public health "system.,, The system grew out of the eighteenth century boards of health that produced the beginnings of administrative law. Public health law is grounded on statutory provisions that authorize various forms of state action and on judicial decisions that resolve constitutional challenges to those actions.
Faithfully Executing The Laws: Internal Legal Constraints On Executive Power, Dawn E. Johnsen
Faithfully Executing The Laws: Internal Legal Constraints On Executive Power, Dawn E. Johnsen
Articles by Maurer Faculty
Since September 11, 2001 the Bush Administration has engaged in a host of controversial counterterrorism actions that threaten civil liberties and even the physical safety of those targeted: enemy combatant designations, extreme interrogation techniques, extraordinary renditions, secret overseas prisons, and warrantless domestic surveillance. To justify otherwise-unlawful policies, President Bush and his lawyers have espoused an extreme view of expansive presidential power during times of war and national emergency. Debate has raged about the details of desirable external checks on presidential excesses, with emphasis appropriately on the U.S. Congress and the courts. Yet an essential internal source of constraint is often …
Interpreting Bills Of Rights: The Value Of A Comparative Approach, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Interpreting Bills Of Rights: The Value Of A Comparative Approach, Jack Tsen-Ta Lee
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
In certain jurisdictions, among them Malaysia, Singapore, and the United States, the practice of consulting comparative legal materials in interpreting domestic bills of rights has been criticized as illegitimate. This article examines four main concerns: (1) the texts of bills of rights -- the argument that a bill of rights is to be interpreted within its own four walls and not in the light of analogies drawn from other jurisdictions; (2) national identity -- the argument that a bill of rights embodies the values of a nation's people, and it is wrong to refer to foreign experiences to determine such …