Law Commons^™

Grand Jury Innovation: Toward A Functional Makeover Of The Ancient Bulwark Of Liberty, Roger Fairfax

Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals

The grand jury is a "much maligned" organ of the criminal justice system.' Regularly employed in only about half of the states and grudgingly tolerated in the federal system,2 the American grand jury for two centuries has been criticized as costly, ineffective, overly-compliant, and redundant. Prescriptions have ranged from reforms designed to improve the grand jury's performance of its traditional filtering and charging functions to the outright abolition of the grand jury. Consequently, much of the scholarly defense of the grand jury seemingly has done little more than attempt to justify its very existence.

This Article seeks to take the …

A Crime Victim's Right To Be "Reasonably Heard": Kenna V. United States District Court, Michael P. Vidmar

Golden Gate University Law Review

In Kenna v. United States District Court, the Ninth Circuit held that under the Crime Victim's Rights Act ("CYRA"), a crime victim's right to be "reasonably heard" during sentencing was not limited to written impact statements, but included the right to allocute at any public proceeding. This was an issue of first impression in the Ninth Circuit. "No court of appeals had addressed the scope of this particular CVRA right." Two district courts had considered this issue and had reached contrary decisions. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the United States District Court for the District of Utah that a plausible …

Defining "Ordinary Prudential Doctrines" After Booker: Why The Limited Remand Is The Least Of Many Evils, Michael Guasco

Golden Gate University Law Review

This Note examines the limited-remand approach in comparison with the approaches taken by the different circuits. Part I discusses the history of the Sentencing Guidelines and the cases, up to and including Booker, that completely changed the way the Sentencing Guidelines were used. Part II sets forth the history of the traditional plain error standard of review and the contemporary "Plain Error Problem." Part III examines the limited-remand approach and compares it with the approach taken in other circuits. Part IV argues that the limited-remand approach is the best of a list of bad possible choices but that the Ninth …

Violence In The Courts: The Ninth Circuit's Attempt To Grapple With And Pin Down What Is A "Crime Of Violence" In United States V. Serna, Daniel S. Cho

Golden Gate University Law Review

This Note examines the limitations of the strict categorical approach; the method by which sentencing courts and courts of review determine whether an offense is a crime of violence for sentence enhancement purposes. Part I of this Note examines the "crime of violence" sentence enhancement under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines"). Part II examines the Ninth Circuit's analysis of what constitutes a crime of violence in United States v. Serna. Part III proposes that the types of sources available to sentencing courts when analyzing whether an offense is a violent crime should be expanded based on Justice O'Connor's dissenting opinion …

Lessons Learned, Lessons Lost: Immigration Enforcement's Failed Experiment With Penal Severity, Teresa A. Miller

Journal Articles

This article traces the evolution of “get tough” sentencing and corrections policies that were touted as the solution to a criminal justice system widely viewed as “broken” in the mid-1970s. It draws parallels to the adoption some twenty years later of harsh, punitive policies in the immigration enforcement system to address perceptions that it is similarly “broken,” policies that have embraced the theories, objectives and tools of criminal punishment, and caused the two systems to converge. In discussing the myriad of harms that have resulted from the convergence of these two systems, and the criminal justice system’s recent shift away …

Unconstitutional Exploitation Of Delegated Authority: How To Deter Prosecutors From Using "Substantial Assistance" To Defeat The Intent Of Federal Sentencing Laws, Adriano Hrvatin

Golden Gate University Law Review

This Comment addresses whether the intent of the federal sentencing system is defeated when prosecutors reward high-level drug offenders with lenient sentences in exchange for testimony against less culpable co-conspirators. This Comment argues that prosecutors violate separation-of-powers principles when they move for downward departures on behalf of kingpins who provide substantial assistance in a case against less culpable co-defendants because Congress did not authorize such an exercise of prosecutorial discretion. In such instances where the intent of Congress is defeated, the prosecutor is essentially making law and thereby encroaching upon the law-making function of Congress. To cure this constitutional abuse …

Criminal Procedure - United States V. Buckland, Brian Feinberg

Golden Gate University Law Review

In United States v. Buckland, the defendant appealed his drug conviction, arguing that the penalty provisions of the federal drug statute under which he was convicted and sentenced was facially unconstitutional. In light of the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Apprendi v. New Jersey, the primary issue was whether Calvin Wayne Buckland's sentence could be enhanced without the enhancement factor, in this case the quantity of the drugs he was responsible for, being determined by a jury. After rehearing the case en banc, the court concluded that the statute was not unconstitutional on its face. However, the court concluded …

United States V. Ruiz: Are Plea Agreements Conditioned On Brady Waivers Unconstitutional?, Shane Cahill

Golden Gate University Law Review

In United States u. Ruiz, the Ninth Circuit ruled that such waivers are unconstitutional, violating the principle that defendants in criminal cases must knowingly and voluntarily plead guilty for the plea to be constitutionally valid. The purpose of this article is to discuss the law leading up to the Ninth Circuit's ruling in Ruiz, to examine the court's ruling itself, and to analyze the impact this decision could have on plea bargaining, an integral part of the criminal justice system. In Part II, this Note discusses Ruiz's facts and procedural history. Part III, section A outlines the prosecution's duty to …

Criminal Procedure - United States V. Nordby, Adriano Hrvatin

Golden Gate University Law Review

The Nordby court held that a finding of drug quantity under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) by the district court at sentencing pursuant to a preponderance of the evidence violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the notice and jury-trial guarantees of the Sixth Amendment when drug quantity was used to increase the prescribed statutory maximum penalty. In requiring that drug quantity be submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the Ninth Circuit overruled nearly fifteen years of its own precedent.

Criminal Procedure - Macfarlane V. Walter, Jennifer Benesis

Golden Gate University Law Review

In Macfarlane v. Walter, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that Washington state and county early-release credit systems for prisoners violate the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution. The early-release credit systems unconstitutionally provide fewer early-release credits to pre-trial detainees who cannot afford to post bail than to similarly-situated prisoners who post bail and serve their entire sentences after trial in state prison. The court held that awarding fewer good behavior credits for time served in county jail than for time served in state prison denies equal protection of the law to pre-trial …

Criminal Procedure - Parretti V. United States, Nedia L. Desouza

Golden Gate University Law Review

In Parretti v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, addressed two constitutional claims: (1) whether Giancarlo Parretti's arrest pursuant to an Extradition Treaty with France violated the Fourth Amendment; and (2) whether his detention without bail prior to the French government's request for his extradition violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The en banc court refused to address these issues, however, claiming that since Parretti fled the United States while his appeal was pending, he was a fugitive from justice. The en banc court therefore dismissed his appeal …

The Dilemma Of Difference: Race As A Sentencing Factor, Palcido G. Gomez

Golden Gate University Law Review

This paper addresses the dilemma of difference, specifically that associated with the race of an offender, as it affects criminal sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines mandated by the Sentencing Reform Act. I argue that federal judges should continue to consider an offender's race as a mitigating factor when imposing criminal sentences, despite language to the contrary in the guidelines and the enabling statute.

Criminal Procedure - United States V. Roe: Child Abuse Warrants Departure From Sentencing Guidelines In Extraordinary Circumstances, Sara Vukson Winter

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure - United States V. De Gross: The Ninth Circuit Expands Restrictions On A Criminal Defendant's Right To Exercise Peremptory Challenges, Eric K. Ferraro

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Procedure - United States V. Restrepo: Uncharged Conduct Now Considered In The Ninth Circuit Under Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Matthew A. Goodin

Golden Gate University Law Review

In United States v. Restrepo, the Ninth Circuit, on a petition for rehearing, held that conduct of which the defendant was neither charged nor convicted could be taken into consideration at the defendant's sentencing hearing. The court reasoned that this interpretation is consistent with the clear intent of the United States Sentencing Commission and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The Ninth Circuit also held that when considering uncharged conduct at defendant's post-conviction sentencing hearing, a preponderance of the evidence standard is sufficient for due process concerns. When used to enhance a sentence, however, a more demanding interpretation of the standard is …

Criminal Procedure - Spain V. Rushen: Shackles Or Show Time? A Defendant's Right To See And Be Seen, Randall E. Tuskowski

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Criminal Law & Procedure, Samuel Santistevan, Douglas Buchanan

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Panel: Sentencing

Golden Gate University Law Review

Of all the decisions facing trial judges, those surrounding sentencing are the most difficult. Public opinion focuses on the sentencing of criminal defendants - particularly those defendants whose trials have received media attention - and public outrage results from what is perceived as a "light" sentence. Judges are called upon to be "tougher" on criminals, and women judges in particular are perceived as being too lenient. The NAWJ, in recognition of the difficulty faced by all judges in the area of sentencing, presented the panel on Sentencing to share and discuss viewpoints on this issue.

Criminal Law & Procedure, Patricia A. Seitas, C. Elliot Kessler, Steven Booska, Mark F. Liscio

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Crime Of Criminal Sentencing Based On Rehabilitation, Louis R. Lopez

Golden Gate University Law Review

A lively debate began in the late 1970's on the topic of criminal sentencing. A major attack was launched on the indeterminate sentence and its companion concepts of probation and parole. Changes in state law on indeterminate sentencing were made but some writers rose to defend the indeterminate sentence and its justification - the rehabilitative theory of punishment. It is not clear how long and intense the struggle will be before the rehabilitative (a.k.a. reform, treatment) theory is put to rest or at least put in proper perspective; it should exist not as a basis for a sentencing plan but …

Criminal Law And Procedure, Patricia A. Seitas, Robinson R. Ng, Jill A. Schwendinger, Bonita L. Marmor

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.

New Developments In 2001 Chinese Criminal Procedure Law, Xia Jinwen

Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law

On March 17,1996, the 8th National People's Congress passed a new criminal procedure law during its 4th conference, based on an earlier code promulgated on January 1, 1980. In general, the new Criminal Procedure Code introduced significant developments in connection with the following aspects of the law: presumption of innocence, coercive measures, abolition of exemption from prosecution, criminal defenses, and the reformation of judicial proceedings.

Criminal Law And Procedure, Lee R. Roper, John Douglas Moore, Paige L. Wickland, Charles Ferrera

Golden Gate University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Gideon'S Ghost: Providing The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel In Times Of Budgetary Crisis, Heather P. Baxter

Faculty Scholarship

This Article discusses how the budget crisis, caused by the recent economic downturn, has created a constitutional crisis with regard to the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel. The landmark case of Gideon v. Wainwright required states, under the Sixth Amendment, to provide free counsel to indigent criminal defendants. However, as a result of the current financial crisis, many of those who represent the indigent have found their funding cut dramatically. Consequently, Gideon survives, if at all, only as a ghostly shadow prowling the halls of criminal justice throughout the country.

This Article analyzes specific budget cuts from various states and …

Expanding The Scope Of The Good-Faith Exception To The Exclusionary Rule To Include A Law Enforcement Officer's Reasonable Reliance On Well-Settled Case Law That Is Subsequently Overruled , Ross M. Oklewicz

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Culture Clash: The Challenge Of Lawyering Across Difference In Juvenile Court, Tamar R. Birckhead

Tamar R Birckhead

In analyzing the causes of wrongful convictions of youth in juvenile court, the role of the defense attorney can be overlooked and its importance underestimated. Although juvenile defenders are trained to advocate based on their young client‟s expressed interest rather than relying on what they deem to be in the child‟s best interest, this basic tenet is often more challenging to follow than is commonly acknowledged. The norms of effective criminal defense practice—which emphasize rigorous oral and written advocacy with little mention of whether the client has learned a lesson from the experience—stand in direct contrast to the informal culture …

Databases, Doctrine, And Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Erin Murphy

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Over the past twenty years there has been an explosion in the creation, availability, and use of criminal justice databases. Large scale database systems now routinely influence law enforcement decisions ranging from formal determinations to arrest or convict an individual to informal judgments to subject a person to secondary pre-flight screening or investigate possible gang membership. Evidence gathered from database-related sources is now commonly introduced, and can play a pivotal proof role, in criminal trials. Although much has been written about the failure of constitutional law to adequately respond to the threat to privacy rights posed by databases, less attention …

The False Promise Of Retributive Proportionality, Aya Gruber

Publications

No abstract provided.

A Distributive Theory Of Criminal Law, Aya Gruber

Publications

In criminal law circles, the accepted wisdom is that there are two and only two true justifications of punishment-retributivism and utilitarianism. The multitude of moral claims about punishment may thus be reduced to two propositions: (1) punishment should be imposed because defendants deserve it, and (2) punishment should be imposed because it makes society safer. At the same time, most penal scholars notice the trend in criminal law to de-emphasize intent, centralize harm, and focus on victims, but they largely write off this trend as an irrational return to antiquated notions of vengeance. This Article asserts that there is in …

“Intelligence” Searches And Purpose: A Significant Mismatch Between Constitutional Criminal Procedure And The Law Of Intelligence-Gathering, Robert C. Power

Robert C. Power

No abstract provided.