Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Black motherhood (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Delegation of powers (1)
-
- Desistance (1)
- Drug testing (1)
- Family violence (1)
- Federal government (1)
- Institutional racism (1)
- Law (1)
- MUSC (1)
- Medical University of South Carolina (1)
- Medical discrimination (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Motherhood (1)
- Mothers (1)
- Pregnant women (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) (1)
- Sex (1)
- Spouse abuse (1)
- United States. (1)
- United States. Congress (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Beyond Parity: Section 1983 And The State Courts, Susan Herman
Beyond Parity: Section 1983 And The State Courts, Susan Herman
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Wisconsin Sentence Modification: A View From The Trial Court, Kate Kruse, Kim E. Patterson
Wisconsin Sentence Modification: A View From The Trial Court, Kate Kruse, Kim E. Patterson
Faculty Scholarship
In Wisconsin, trial courts have discretion to modify a defendant's criminal sentence if the defendant introduces a "new factor." Published Wisconsin case law gives little guidance on what constitutes a new factor. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has declined to find a new factor present in every case it has published since defining "new factor" in 1978. Because of ambiguous and conflicting rulings, the standards for both prongs of the new factor definition remain unclear. This Comment attempts to shed light on the new factor requirement for sentence modification by examining Wisconsin trial court decisions on a limited sample of sentence …
Charleston Policy: Substance Or Abuse, The , Kimani Paul-Emile
Charleston Policy: Substance Or Abuse, The , Kimani Paul-Emile
Faculty Scholarship
In 1989, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) adopted a policy that, according to subjective criteria, singled out for drug testing, certain women who sought prenatal care and childbirth services would be tested for prohibited substances. Women who tested positive were arrested, incarcerated and prosecuted for crimes ranging from misdemeanor substance possession to felony substance distribution to a minor. In this Article, the Author argues that by intentionally targeting indigent Black women for prosecution, the MUSC Policy continued the United States legacy of their systematic oppression and resulted in the criminalizing of Black Motherhood.
Dual Sovereignty, Federalism And National Criminal Law: Modernist Constitutional Doctrine And The Nonrole Of The Supreme Court, William W. Van Alstyne
Dual Sovereignty, Federalism And National Criminal Law: Modernist Constitutional Doctrine And The Nonrole Of The Supreme Court, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
This paper examines the growing movement away from the functional nature of federalism contained within the Constitution toward a federalist system that gives extensive discretion to Congress and is only limited by political checks. This political system of federalism has limited the role of the Court in national criminal law because of the deference the Court is expected to give Congress.
Judges, Lawyers And The Penalty Of Death, Michael E. Tigar
Judges, Lawyers And The Penalty Of Death, Michael E. Tigar
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Seasoned To The Use, Carol Sanger
Seasoned To The Use, Carol Sanger
Faculty Scholarship
Two recent novels, Presumed Innocent and The Good Mother, have more in common than critical success, longevity on best-seller lists and big-name movie adaptations. Both books are about law: Presumed Innocent is a tale of murder in the big city; The Good Mother is the story of a custody fight over a little girl. Central characters in both books are lawyers. Turow is a lawyer, and Miller thanks lawyers. While the books could be classified in other ways – Presumed Innocent as mystery, The Good Mother as women's fiction – each meets a suggested genre specification of a legal novel: …
Cessation Of Family Violence: Deterrence And Dissuasion, Jeffrey Fagan
Cessation Of Family Violence: Deterrence And Dissuasion, Jeffrey Fagan
Faculty Scholarship
Family violence research has only recently begun to investigate desistance. Recent developments in the study of behaviors other than family violence, such as the use of addictive substances, suggest that common processes can be identified in the cessation of disparate behaviors involving diverse populations and occurring in different settings. Desistance is the outcome of processes that begin with aversive experiences leading to a decision to stop. Desistance apparently follows legal sanctions in nearly three spouse abuse cases in four, but the duration of cessation is unknown beyond short study periods. Batterers with shorter, less severe histories have a higher probability …