Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Terrorism (2)
- Armed conflict (1)
- Basra (1)
- Conflict (1)
- Counsel (1)
-
- Democracy (1)
- Dubrovka Theater (1)
- Framers (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Geneva Conventions (1)
- Globalization (1)
- Lethal force (1)
- Marine Corps commandants (1)
- Non-lethal weapons (1)
- Patriotism (1)
- Persuasive speech (1)
- Peter Murphy (1)
- Societies (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- State failure (1)
- State system (1)
- Statutes (1)
- Terrorist speech (1)
- Torture (1)
- Treaties (1)
- Treaty interpretation (1)
- Waco (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Failed States, Or The State As Failure?, Rosa Ehrenreich Brooks
Failed States, Or The State As Failure?, Rosa Ehrenreich Brooks
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article seeks to challenge a basic assumption of international law and policy, arguing that the existing state-based international legal framework stands in the way of developing effective responses to state failure. It offers an alternative theoretical framework designed to spark debate about better legal and policy responses to failed states. Although the article uses failed states as a lens to focus its arguments, it also has broad implications for how we think about sovereignty, the evolving global order, and the place of states within it.
State failure causes a wide range of humanitarian, legal, and security problems. Unsurprisingly, given …
Terrorist Speech And The Future Of Free Expression, Laura K. Donohue
Terrorist Speech And The Future Of Free Expression, Laura K. Donohue
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The crucial point is this: Both liberal, democratic states, and non-state terrorist organizations need free speech. Prominent scholars have written elegantly and at length on the role of this liberty for the former. While their arguments surface at times in the text, the author does not dwell on them. Instead, she wrestles with the question: Under what circumstances are the interests of the state secured and the opportunism of terrorist organizations avoided? Here, the experiences of the United States and United Kingdom prove instructive. On both sides of the Atlantic, where the state acts as sovereign, efforts to restrict persuasive …
Tangled Up In Khaki And Blue: Lethal And Non-Lethal Weapons In Recent Confrontations, David A. Koplow
Tangled Up In Khaki And Blue: Lethal And Non-Lethal Weapons In Recent Confrontations, David A. Koplow
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Too often, military and law enforcement authorities have found themselves constrained by inadequate weaponry: the tools available to them, in addressing confrontations with entrenched opponents of various sorts, are either too weak (not sufficing to disarm or defeat the enemy) or too strong (generating unacceptable "collateral damage" in harming innocent people or property). An emerging category of "non-lethal weapons" carries promise for resolving this dilemma, proffering deft new capabilities for disabling, dissuading, or defeating opponents without inflicting death or permanent injury.
Some primitive non-lethal weapons (such as truncheons, tear gas, and water cannon) have long been staples in the inventories …
Protecting Rights In The Age Of Terrorism: Challenges And Opportunities, Rosa Brooks
Protecting Rights In The Age Of Terrorism: Challenges And Opportunities, Rosa Brooks
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Depending on whom you speak to these days (and the mood in which you find them), international law is either practically moribund, or it's more vibrant and important than it has been for years. To take the good news story first, international law issues have been at the forefront of public discourse over the past few years. Pick your issue: the U.N. Charter and the international law on the use of force? The Convention Against Torture? The Geneva Conventions? You'll find it on the front page these days. Journalists are phoning international law professors for background briefings, and students are …
The Politics Of The Geneva Conventions: Avoiding Formalist Traps, Rosa Brooks
The Politics Of The Geneva Conventions: Avoiding Formalist Traps, Rosa Brooks
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The Geneva Conventions were drafted in 1949, in another world. The world of the Geneva Conventions' "framers" is still familiar to all of us, though increasingly it is familiar from movies and books rather from the evening news or, still less, our own lived experience. The world in which the Conventions were drafted was a world of states: powerful states, weak states, predatory states, law-abiding states, but states all the same. Soldiers wore uniforms designed by their states, carried weapons issued by their states, obeyed orders given by their commanders, and fought against the armies of other states.
Well--most of …
Letter Of Appreciation: Peter Murphy Retires After A Lifetime Of Dedication As Counsel To The Commandant Of The Marine Corps, James E. Baker
Letter Of Appreciation: Peter Murphy Retires After A Lifetime Of Dedication As Counsel To The Commandant Of The Marine Corps, James E. Baker
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This letter reflects upon the retirement of Peter Murphy after 20 years of service as counsel to the commandant of the Marine Corps. Chief Judge Baker discusses Peter Murphy’s moral courage, common sense, and unflinching dignity while serving as counsel. He relates how Murphy has an abiding commitment to the great institutions of his life and of our lives: the rule of law, the military, and the Marine Corps.