Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Abortifacient (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Doctor (1)
- Drug (1)
- Dying (1)
-
- ERISA (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Euthanasia (1)
- Family planning (1)
- Federal (1)
- Federally-funded (1)
- Financial risk shifting (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom (1)
- Funding (1)
- Healer (1)
- Healers (1)
- Health care (1)
- Liberty (1)
- Medical treatment (1)
- Morning-after pill (1)
- Organized religion (1)
- Parent (1)
- Parents (1)
- Patient (1)
- Patients (1)
- Personal injury (1)
- Physician (1)
- Physician-assisted (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Right To Health Care In The United States, Ken Wing
The Right To Health Care In The United States, Ken Wing
Faculty Articles
This article provides an analysis of the history of constitutional interpretation in the United States, and reveals that any right Americans have to health care is a political rather than constitutional right.
Religious Healing In The Courts: The Liberties And Liabilities Of Patients, Parents, And Healers, Barry Nobel
Religious Healing In The Courts: The Liberties And Liabilities Of Patients, Parents, And Healers, Barry Nobel
Seattle University Law Review
Accordingly, in light of this struggle to balance public health with religious liberty, this Article chronicles the evolving liberties and liabilities of religious patients, parents, and healers over the course of the twentieth century and examines the current state of religious healing law. Throughout, it advocates the greatest possible liberty for religious healing consistent with public and family security, as well as advocating equal protection under the law for all involved in religious treatment, whether they are members of organized religious groups or individual practitioners.
People With Pipes: A Question Of Euthanasia, Susan Machler
People With Pipes: A Question Of Euthanasia, Susan Machler
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will focus on the constitutional and common law backgrounds of suicide and the right to refuse medical treatment, the need for well-articulated policies on right-todie issues, and a possible legislative solution that will balance the needs of dying individuals with society's interest in preventing abuse. Until we develop policies regarding physician- assisted suicide, we are leaving the needs and the protection of the dying to "people with pipes." We are leaving policymaking to whomever wins the battle between a doctor who invents suicide machines and a prosecutor who wants to put the doctor in jail for an act …
Rust V. Sullivan: Redirecting The Katzenbach V. Morgan Power, Paul Chuey
Rust V. Sullivan: Redirecting The Katzenbach V. Morgan Power, Paul Chuey
Seattle University Law Review
By deferring to the discretion of another branch of the federal government on a question of constitutional interpretation, the Rust Court implicitly resurrects and reshapes the long ignored doctrine of Katzenbach v. Morgan. Despite their different substantive issues, these two cases have a similar effect on the federal judiciary's role in constitutional interpretation. Section I of this Note describes the facts and history surrounding Rust and Morgan. Section II examines the Rust doctrine of judicial deference in the context of Morgan. Section III examines the Rust Court's approach to the First Amendment issues raised by the regulation …
Managed Care, Utilization Review, And Financial Risk Shifting: Compensating Patients For Health Care Cost Containment Injuries, Vernellia R. Randall
Managed Care, Utilization Review, And Financial Risk Shifting: Compensating Patients For Health Care Cost Containment Injuries, Vernellia R. Randall
Seattle University Law Review
This Article examines current tort remedies for personal injury claims and explores the problems that arise when these remedies are applied to physicians' actions that are directed by third-party payers. Part II of this Article explores the organization and historical development of managed health care products. Part III considers the past and present uses of the utilization review process and financial risk shifting. Part IV explores the applicability of traditional theories of tort liability to third-party payers, including direct liability of third-party payers who market managed care products. Part V considers the barriers that ERISA presents to compensating patients for …
Approval Of Ru-486 As A Postcoital Contraceptive, Kari Hanson
Approval Of Ru-486 As A Postcoital Contraceptive, Kari Hanson
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment argues that if RU-486 were approved as a postcoital contraceptive rather than as an abortifacient, the drug would be of greater overall benefit to women seeking to control their fertility. To support the argument that RU-486 should be approved as a postcoital contraceptive, Part II of this Comment examines the background and development of the drug, the controversy it has engendered, and the drug's recently discovered contraceptive potential. Part III provides a short look at the process by which the FDA approves new drugs and discusses how RU-486 would likely progress through this process. Part IV begins by …