Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Admissibility (1)
- Biases (1)
- Book reviews (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
-
- Evidence (1)
- Exclusionary rule (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (1)
- Jurors (1)
- Katz v. United States (1)
- Lee (Cynthia) (1)
- Mapp v. Ohio (1)
- Provocation (1)
- Reasonable person (1)
- Reasonableness (1)
- Rules (1)
- Searches (1)
- Seizures (1)
- Self defense (1)
- Sixth Amendment (1)
- Standards (1)
- Stereotypes (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Equality, Objectivity, And Neutrality, Alafair S. Burke
Equality, Objectivity, And Neutrality, Alafair S. Burke
Michigan Law Review
When is homicide reasonable? That familiar, yet unanswered question continues to intrigue both courts and criminal law scholars, in large part because any response must first address the question, "reasonable to whom?" The standard story about why that threshold question is both difficult and interesting usually involves a juxtaposition of "objective" and "subjective" standards for judging claims of reasonableness. On the one hand, the story goes, is a "subjective" standard of reasonableness under which jurors evaluate the reasonableness of a criminal defendant's beliefs and actions by comparing them to those of a hypothetical reasonable person sharing all of the individual …
How Earl Warren's Twenty-Two Years In Law Enforcement Affected His Work As Chief Justice, Yale Kamisar
How Earl Warren's Twenty-Two Years In Law Enforcement Affected His Work As Chief Justice, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Before becoming governor of California, Earl Warren had spent his entire legal career, twenty-two years, in law enforcement. Professor Kamisar maintains that this experience significantly influenced Warren's work as a Supreme Court justice and gave him a unique perspective into police interrogation and other police practices. This article discusses some of Warren's experiences in law enforcement and searches for evidence of that experience in Warren's opinions. For example, when Warren was head of the Alameda County District Attorney's Office, he and his deputies not only relied on confessions in many homicide cases but also themselves interrogated homicide suspects. The seeds …