Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- 138 S. Ct. 356; definition of "mobile interception device"; limitations on electronic surveillance; Title III; “core concerns” test; congressional interpretation of Title III; regulate electronic eavesdropping by government officials; wiretap authorization order; Title III suppression remedy; Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (1)
- 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510–2521. (1)
- Criminal trial techniques; closing arguments; permissible argument; improper closing arguments; out-of-bounds argument; criminal trial closing arguments; personal attacks against opposing counsel; commenting on defendant's exercise of constitutional rights; expressing personal opinions in criminal closing argument; prejudicing the jury; asking jury to send a message to deter future crimes; convincing jurors to render verdict our of fear (1)
- Dahda v. United States (1)
- Or community values protection; improper use of Golden Rule in closing argument; closing argument arguing facts outside the record; personal attacks on defendant; commenting on credibility of witnesses; invited response in closing argument; (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Criminal Procedure—Jurisdictional Limitations On Federal Judges' Ability To Authorize Electronic Surveillance: A Cry For Congressional Guidance, Meredith A. Powell
Criminal Procedure—Jurisdictional Limitations On Federal Judges' Ability To Authorize Electronic Surveillance: A Cry For Congressional Guidance, Meredith A. Powell
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crossing The Line: Techniques Of Closing Argument That Are Out Of Bounds In Criminal Trials, Blake R. Mills
Crossing The Line: Techniques Of Closing Argument That Are Out Of Bounds In Criminal Trials, Blake R. Mills
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.