Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (6780)
- Selected Works (1975)
- University of Michigan Law School (1021)
- American University Washington College of Law (594)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (581)
-
- Universitas Indonesia (555)
- SelectedWorks (549)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (516)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (477)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (468)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (419)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (400)
- Fordham Law School (376)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (356)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (341)
- Columbia Law School (339)
- William & Mary Law School (336)
- Illinois State University (334)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (334)
- University of Kentucky (334)
- University of Richmond (329)
- UIC School of Law (325)
- University of Georgia School of Law (309)
- Seattle University School of Law (297)
- West Virginia University (295)
- Cleveland State University (277)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (261)
- Brooklyn Law School (259)
- Pace University (258)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (247)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (1601)
- Criminal Law (909)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (816)
- Death penalty (587)
- Sentencing (536)
-
- Evidence (507)
- Constitutional Law (459)
- Criminal justice (453)
- Capital punishment (437)
- Criminal procedure (435)
- Punishment (423)
- Crime (350)
- Fourth Amendment (279)
- Criminal (255)
- Due process (249)
- Supreme Court (245)
- Police (243)
- Criminal Procedure (242)
- Crimes (231)
- Race (223)
- Rape (214)
- Law (211)
- International Law (208)
- Constitutional law (200)
- Courts (195)
- Eighth Amendment (194)
- International Criminal Court (194)
- Sixth Amendment (188)
- Jurisprudence (181)
- Law and Society (180)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (6633)
- Faculty Scholarship (1136)
- All Faculty Scholarship (579)
- Michigan Law Review (579)
- Faculty Publications (328)
-
- Articles (309)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (297)
- West Virginia Law Review (287)
- Touro Law Review (284)
- War Crimes Memoranda (259)
- Scholarly Works (257)
- Kentucky Law Journal (255)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (254)
- UIC Law Review (254)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (237)
- Indiana Law Journal (236)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (227)
- Buffalo Law Review (225)
- Seattle University Law Review (219)
- Villanova Law Review (217)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (216)
- University of Richmond Law Review (210)
- Journal Articles (208)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (206)
- ExpressO (199)
- Cleveland State Law Review (198)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (195)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (188)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (181)
- Publications (173)
- Publication Type
Articles 20161 - 20190 of 27447
Full-Text Articles in Law
12-03-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
12-03-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624 (1977)
Harry A. Blackmun's handwritten notes from oral argument.
Florida's Incompetency-To-Stand Trial Rule: A Possible Life Sentence?, Frank A. Vickory
Florida's Incompetency-To-Stand Trial Rule: A Possible Life Sentence?, Frank A. Vickory
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
12-01-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
12-01-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624 (1977)
Harry A. Blackmun's handwritten notes from oral argument.
Criminal Law, Charles H. Weston, Walker P. Johnson Jr.
Criminal Law, Charles H. Weston, Walker P. Johnson Jr.
Mercer Law Review
The several hundred criminal cases decided by the Georgia Supreme Court and the Georgia Court of Appeals have been gleaned in an effort to present what we believe are the most interesting and informative. As we went through these cases, one thing became evident: Some relief must be given to the courts in their monumental task of hearing an increasing number of appeals and writs.
In categorizing the cases, we have used broad characterization in some instances but have headlined a very narrow point in others. In any event, the heading should point a reader in the right direction.
'Materiality' Limits Prosecutors' Duty To Disclose Exculpatory Evidence To Defense, James K. Knight Jr.
'Materiality' Limits Prosecutors' Duty To Disclose Exculpatory Evidence To Defense, James K. Knight Jr.
Mercer Law Review
In United States v. Agurs, the U.S. Supreme Court held for the first time that criminal prosecutors have a constitutional duty to voluntarily disclose exculpatory evidence to a defendant even when the defense doesn't request such evidence. The Court, however, limited the scope of this new obligation by narrowly defining the category of material evidence to which it applies. It held that the duty arises only when the exculpatory evidence is so material that had it been disclosed, its use at trial would have created a reasonable doubt of the defendant's guilt that did not otherwise exist.
Respondent Agurs …
11-29-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
11-29-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
Codd v. Velger, 429 U.S. 624 (1977)
Harry A. Blackmun's notes from oral argument.
Sentencing Study, Dan Kilpatric, Jack Brummel
Sentencing Study, Dan Kilpatric, Jack Brummel
Washington Law Review
Sentencing constitutes the critical connection between the criminal law and the penal system. Therefore, any analysis of sentencing involves fundamental and perplexing questions about the purposes and problems of the criminal justice system. This comment will focus on one of those problems: the exercise of judicial discretion in sentencing.
Criminal Law—Multiple Punishment Under The Organized Crime Control Act—A Need For Reexamination Of Wharton's Rule And Double Jeopardy—Iannelli V. United States, 420 U.S. 770 (1975), Christopher L. Koch
Criminal Law—Multiple Punishment Under The Organized Crime Control Act—A Need For Reexamination Of Wharton's Rule And Double Jeopardy—Iannelli V. United States, 420 U.S. 770 (1975), Christopher L. Koch
Washington Law Review
Robert lannelli and seven other petitioners were charged with conspiring to violate and violating 18 U.S.C. § 1955, a federal gambling statute which makes it a crime for five or more persons to conduct, finance, manage, supervise, direct, or own a gambling business prohibited by state law. Each petitioner was convicted of both offenses, and each was sentenced under both counts. On appeal the petitioners argued that conviction of both conspiracy and the substantive offense was precluded by Wharton's Rule, a common law exception to the principle that a substantive offense and a conspiracy to commit the offense are distinct …
Consent In Criminal Law: Violence In Sports, Michigan Law Review
Consent In Criminal Law: Violence In Sports, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Because there have been few criminal prosecutions for violence in sports, there are several difficult issues that have received only cursory analysis. This Note will focus on one such issue-the existence and effect of the consent of the injured party. In section I, it will analyze the various general theories relating to the nature of actual consent and will suggest that the current theoretical framework's emphasis on ascertaining the victim's subjective state of mind is, in some contexts, ill-conceived and unhelpful. It will argue that societal interests involved in human interactions should become a major focus of any analysis, particularly …
A Review Of The Presentence Diagnostic Study Procedure In North Carolina, Charles E. Smith
A Review Of The Presentence Diagnostic Study Procedure In North Carolina, Charles E. Smith
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reforming The Federal Criminal Code: A Congressional Response, Edward M. Kennedy
Reforming The Federal Criminal Code: A Congressional Response, Edward M. Kennedy
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Craig V. Boren, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Brewer V. Williams, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Brewer V. Williams, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Ingraham V. Wright, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Ingraham V. Wright, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Coker V. Georgia, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Santa Fe Industries, Inc. V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Santa Fe Industries, Inc. V. Green, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Castaneda V. Partida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Castaneda V. Partida, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Donovan, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Donovan, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Antelope, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Antelope, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal
The Criminal Justice Act - 1964 To 1976, Dudley B. Bonsal
Indiana Law Journal
Colloquium: The Federal Judiciary: Essays from the Bench
Objectivity And Habeas Corpus: Should Federal District Court Judges Be Permitted To Rule Upon The Validity Of Their Own Criminal Trial Conduct?, Marilyn L. Kelley
Objectivity And Habeas Corpus: Should Federal District Court Judges Be Permitted To Rule Upon The Validity Of Their Own Criminal Trial Conduct?, Marilyn L. Kelley
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
It has already been suggested that one of the main purposes of section 2255 was to provide a convenient forum in which the trial judge might testify, if necessary. That purpose is, obviously, contrary to the interpretation rendered in Carvell.
Beyond this inconsistency, Carvell suggests two significant issues: first, that it is highly desirable that the motions be passed upon by the judge who is familiar with the facts; and second, that the criminal trial judge is not likely to be misled by allegations in the 2255 petition as to what had occurred. The first issue raises the question …
". . . We Are The Living Proof . . . ", Frederic L. Faust
". . . We Are The Living Proof . . . ", Frederic L. Faust
Florida State University Law Review
By David Fogel. Cincinnati, Ohio: The W. H. Anderson Co. 1975. Pp. xxi, 328. $9.50.
The Federal Bank Robbery Act - The Problem Of Separately Punishable Offenses
The Federal Bank Robbery Act - The Problem Of Separately Punishable Offenses
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Duress As A Defence To Murder, John Beaumont
Duress As A Defence To Murder, John Beaumont
Dalhousie Law Journal
It is perhaps not surprising that in an age which has witnessed an ever increasing amount of terrorist activity, an opportunity should arise for the courts to examine the present status of the defence of duress in the criminal law. Such an opportunity was afforded to the House of Lords recently in Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland v. Lynch.
Duress As A Defence To Murder, John Beaumont
Duress As A Defence To Murder, John Beaumont
Dalhousie Law Journal
It is perhaps not surprising that in an age which has witnessed an ever increasing amount of terrorist activity, an opportunity should arise for the courts to examine the present status of the defence of duress in the criminal law. Such an opportunity was afforded to the House of Lords recently in Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland v. Lynch.
Duress As A Defence To Murder, John Beaumont
Duress As A Defence To Murder, John Beaumont
Dalhousie Law Journal
It is perhaps not surprising that in an age which has witnessed an ever increasing amount of terrorist activity, an opportunity should arise for the courts to examine the present status of the defence of duress in the criminal law. Such an opportunity was afforded to the House of Lords recently in Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland v. Lynch.
The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer
The Law Of Confessions - The Voluntariness Doctrine, Fredric I. Lederer
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Reviews, Frank J. Remington, George B. Tindall
Book Reviews, Frank J. Remington, George B. Tindall
Vanderbilt Law Review
Fair and Certain Punishment
Review by Frank J. Remington
Punishing Criminals. By Ernest van den Haag. New York: BasicBooks, Inc., 1975. Thinking About Crime. By James Q. Wilson. New York: BasicBooks, Inc., 1975.
Times change. So also do opinions about important social problems such as crime and government's response to crime. The books of both van den Haag and Wilson reflect changing opinions on crime and on what to do about crime. Both urge that we abandon the view that social conditions are an important cause of crime and that an improvement in social conditions will reduce crime substantially.Both urge …
9-15-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
9-15-1976 Notes From Oral Argument, Harry A. Blackmun
Darden v. Florida, 430 U.S. 704 (1977)
Harry A. Blackmun's handwritten notes from oral argument.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
"A Most Deplorable Paradox": Admitting Illegally Obtained Evidence In Georgia--Past, Present, And Future, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Scholarly Works
This Article explores the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in Georgia criminal cases prior to 1961 and during the post-Mapp era and endeavors to assess the future admissibility of illegally seized evidence in Georgia under both federal and state law.