Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Issues Of Expanding The Powers Of The Defense Attorney In The Investigative Actions, D. Chorieva
Issues Of Expanding The Powers Of The Defense Attorney In The Investigative Actions, D. Chorieva
Review of law sciences
In the article emphasizes the need to strengthen the role of advocate in the development and improvement of the institute of advocacy, the role of defence in the consideration of criminal, civil, administrative and economic cases and highlights the focus on the state policy. To eliminate these problems, causing certain obstacles in the defense activity, specific proposals are developed and put forward.
Issues Of Expanding The Powers Of The Defense Attorney In The Investigative Actions, D. Chorieva
Issues Of Expanding The Powers Of The Defense Attorney In The Investigative Actions, D. Chorieva
Review of law sciences
In the article emphasizes the need to strengthen the role of advocate in the development and improvement of the institute of advocacy, the role of defence in the consideration of criminal, civil, administrative and economic cases and highlights the focus on the state policy. To eliminate these problems, causing certain obstacles in the defense activity, specific proposals are developed and put forward.
Prosecuting Conduit Campaign Contributions - Hard Time For Soft Money, Robert D. Probasco
Prosecuting Conduit Campaign Contributions - Hard Time For Soft Money, Robert D. Probasco
Robert Probasco
In recent years, there have been several high-profile prosecutions for violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act, involving contributions nominally by one individual but funded or reimbursed by another individual deemed to be the true contributor. Prosecutions of these “conduit contribution” cases have been surprising in at least three significant respects. First, the prosecutions have been based on violations of FECA’s reporting requirements and may not have involved any violations of the substantive prohibitions or limitations of contributions. Second, the defendants were the donors rather than campaign officials who actually filed reports with FECA. Third, the cases were prosecuted as …