Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (42)
- American University Washington College of Law (22)
- UC Law SF (20)
- UIC School of Law (19)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
-
- William & Mary Law School (16)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (12)
- University of Richmond (12)
- Cleveland State University (9)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
- West Virginia University (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (4)
- University of Kentucky (4)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Campbell University School of Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Seattle University School of Law (2)
- University of Miami Law School (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- New York (32)
- Supreme Court (22)
- Constitutional law (15)
- Martha Fineman (12)
- Federalism (11)
-
- Court of Appeals (8)
- Brown v. Board of Education (7)
- Due Process (7)
- Supreme court (7)
- Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (7)
- First Amendment (6)
- Lochner v. New York (6)
- Abortion (4)
- Akhil Reed Amar (4)
- Book Reviews (4)
- Civil Rights (4)
- Congress (4)
- Constitutional Amendments (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Equal Protection (4)
- Equality (4)
- Family law (4)
- Feminist legal theorists (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Fineman Plan (4)
- Oklahoma (4)
- Search and Seizure (4)
- United States Constitutional Amendments (4)
- Bill of Rights (3)
- Canada (3)
- Publication
-
- Touro Law Review (42)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (21)
- UC Law Constitutional Quarterly (20)
- UIC Law Review (19)
- Michigan Law Review (17)
-
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (12)
- University of Richmond Law Review (11)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (10)
- Cleveland State Law Review (9)
- Oklahoma Law Review (9)
- Indiana Law Journal (7)
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- West Virginia Law Review (5)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (4)
- Kentucky Law Journal (4)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (4)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (4)
- Villanova Law Review (4)
- Campbell Law Review (3)
- Maryland Law Review (3)
- BYU Law Review (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- University of Miami Inter-American Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Florida State University Journal of Transnational Law & Policy (1)
- Florida State University Law Review (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 237
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Jurisprudence Of Tradition And Justice Scalia's Unwritten Constitution, J. Richard Broughton
The Jurisprudence Of Tradition And Justice Scalia's Unwritten Constitution, J. Richard Broughton
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Checking Congress And Balancing Federalism: A Lesson From Separation-Of-Powers Jurisprudence, Keith Werham
Checking Congress And Balancing Federalism: A Lesson From Separation-Of-Powers Jurisprudence, Keith Werham
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Guns, Extremists, And The Constitution, Calvin Massey
Guns, Extremists, And The Constitution, Calvin Massey
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Church And State In Western Europe And The United States: Principles And Perspectives, Sophie C. Van Bijsterveld
Church And State In Western Europe And The United States: Principles And Perspectives, Sophie C. Van Bijsterveld
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Insane" Contradiction Of Singleton V. Norris: Forced Medication In A Death Row Inmate's Medical Interest Which Happens To Facilitate His Execution, Rebecca A. Miller-Rice
The "Insane" Contradiction Of Singleton V. Norris: Forced Medication In A Death Row Inmate's Medical Interest Which Happens To Facilitate His Execution, Rebecca A. Miller-Rice
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law And Criminal Procedure—Media Ride-Alongs Into The Home: Can They Survive A Head-On Collision Between First And Fourth Amendment Rights? Wilson V. Layne, 526 U.S. 603 (1999), Deleith Duke Gossett
Constitutional Law And Criminal Procedure—Media Ride-Alongs Into The Home: Can They Survive A Head-On Collision Between First And Fourth Amendment Rights? Wilson V. Layne, 526 U.S. 603 (1999), Deleith Duke Gossett
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Harmonic Convergence? Constitutional Criminal Procedure In An International Context, Diane Marie Amann
Harmonic Convergence? Constitutional Criminal Procedure In An International Context, Diane Marie Amann
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Wilson, V Layne: Bans Press With Police In The Home, But Leaves Media Ride-Alongs Intact, Kathy A. Brown
Wilson, V Layne: Bans Press With Police In The Home, But Leaves Media Ride-Alongs Intact, Kathy A. Brown
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alden V. Maine And The Jurisprudence Of Structure, Ernest A. Young
Alden V. Maine And The Jurisprudence Of Structure, Ernest A. Young
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Constitutional Crisis In Hong Kong—Is It Over?, Lin Feng
The Constitutional Crisis In Hong Kong—Is It Over?, Lin Feng
Washington International Law Journal
The judgment of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal ("CFA") in the right of abode case has created several constitutional issues, three of which will be addressed in this paper. They are: (1) whether the CFA has the authority to review Chinese legislation; (2) whether the National People's Congress Standing Committee ("NPCSC") should interpret or amend the Basic Law; and (3) whether an original legislative intent approach or a purposive approach should be adopted for the interpretation of the Basic Law. Prompt resolution of these issues is necessary to resolve constitutional uncertainty in Hong Kong. Successful resolution of these …
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Miranda'S Fall?, Kenji Yoshino
Michigan Law Review
If one wishes to revisit a classic, Albert Crunus's The Fall is a riskier choice than Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird, which Steven Lubet eloquently discussed last year in these pages. It is not only that Camus's work will be less familiar to legal audiences than Lee's, despite the fact that The Fall is becoming recognized through critical "revisitation" as perhaps Crunus's greatest novel. It is also that the legal protagonist of The Fall, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, does not have Atticus Finch's immediate appeal. Finch is idealistic, Clamence is existential; Finch is pious, Clamence is debauched; Finch is hopeful, Clamence …
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Losing Faith: America Without Judicial Review?, Erwin Chemerinsky
Michigan Law Review
In the last decade, it has become increasingly trendy to question whether the Supreme Court and constitutional judicial review really can make a difference. Gerald Rosenberg, for example, in The Hollow Hope, expressly questions whether judicial review achieves effective social change. Similarly, Michael Klarman explores whether the Supreme Court's desegregation decisions were effective, except insofar as they produced a right-wing backlash that induced action to desegregate. In Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Mark Tushnet approvingly invokes these arguments (pp. 137, 145), but he goes much further. Professor Tushnet contends that, on balance, constitutional judicial review is harmful. He …
Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process And The Wages Of Judicial Supremacy, John C. Yoo
Choosing Justices: A Political Appointments Process And The Wages Of Judicial Supremacy, John C. Yoo
Michigan Law Review
William H. Rehnquist is not going to be Chief Justice forever - much to the chagrin of Republicans, no doubt. In the last century, Supreme Court Justices have retired, on average, at the age of seventy-one after approximately fourteen years on the bench. By the end of the term of the President we elect this November, Chief Justice Rehnquist will have served on the Supreme Court for thirty-two years and reached the age of eighty. The law of averages suggests that Chief Justice Rehnquist is likely to retire in the next presidential term. In addition to replacing Chief Justice Rehnquist, …
Because We Love You, Rosemary B. Quigley
Because We Love You, Rosemary B. Quigley
Michigan Law Review
I remember the impotence I felt on the eve of the Gulf War in January 1991. No one could have known at that moment what a brief conflict it would be. We had every reason to believe that the Middle East would be hurled into turmoil. And if protracted war ensued, a draft would surely follow. I watched my college boyfriend sink into despair, with the help of a Bob Mould CD, at the prospect of being called to give his life for his country. I remained uncharacteristically mute. In the face of this battle, our positions were too unequal …
Healing The Blind Goddess: Race And Criminal Justice, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Daniel P. Tokaji
Healing The Blind Goddess: Race And Criminal Justice, Mark D. Rosenbaum, Daniel P. Tokaji
Michigan Law Review
Once again, issues of race, ethnicity, and class within our criminal justice system have been thrust into the public spotlight. On both sides of the country, in our nation's two largest cities, police are being called to account for acts of violence directed toward poor people of color. In New York City, a West African immigrant named Amadou Diallo was killed by four white police officers, who fired forty-one bullets at the unarmed man as he stood in the vestibule of his apartment building in a poor section of the Bronx. Did race influence the officers' decisions to fire the …
Recalibrating The Cost Of Harm Advocacy: Getting Beyond Brandenburg, S. Elizabeth Wilborn Malloy, Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.
Recalibrating The Cost Of Harm Advocacy: Getting Beyond Brandenburg, S. Elizabeth Wilborn Malloy, Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr.
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
"The Mis-Characterization Of The Negro": A Race Critique Of The Prior Conviction Impeachment Rule, Montrè D. Carodine
"The Mis-Characterization Of The Negro": A Race Critique Of The Prior Conviction Impeachment Rule, Montrè D. Carodine
Indiana Law Journal
The election of Barack Obama as the nation's first Black President was a watershed moment with respect to race relations in the United States. Obama's election removed what to many seemed a nearly insurmountable racial barrier. Yet as he transitions into his historic role and his family becomes the first Black occupants of the White House, scores of Blacks are housed in jails and prisons across the country. The mass incarceration of Blacks, among other serious issues, demonstrates that race still matters in the United States. As then-presidential candidate Obama acknowledged in the speech that many viewed to be pivotal …
Student Division Symposium Sponsored By The Institute Of The Bill Of Rights Law: Policing Obscenity And Pornography In An Online World, Ann Beeson, Deirdre Mulligan, Bruce Taylor, Bruce Watson, Jonathan Zittrain
Student Division Symposium Sponsored By The Institute Of The Bill Of Rights Law: Policing Obscenity And Pornography In An Online World, Ann Beeson, Deirdre Mulligan, Bruce Taylor, Bruce Watson, Jonathan Zittrain
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Search For A Distinct Religious-Liberty Jurisprudence Under The Washington State Constitution, Katie Hosford
The Search For A Distinct Religious-Liberty Jurisprudence Under The Washington State Constitution, Katie Hosford
Washington Law Review
Article I, Section 11, of the Washington Constitution, titled "Religious Freedom," provides more protection for free exercise of religion and the separation of church and state than the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Because the state constitution provides broader protection for each right, a natural tension arises between the two rights. However, rather than relying on the text of the state constitution, the Supreme Court of Washington has imposed an entirely federal analysis on free exercise cases brought under Washington law. In addition, the establishment cases under Article I, Section 11, have inconsistently interpreted the language of the state …
Of Moons, Thongs, Holdings And Dicta: State V. Fly And The Rule Of Law, Thomas L. Fowler
Of Moons, Thongs, Holdings And Dicta: State V. Fly And The Rule Of Law, Thomas L. Fowler
Campbell Law Review
Section I of this Article reviews the facts of State v. Fly, North Carolina's law of indecent exposure prior to Fly and the Court of Appeals' decision. Section II analyzes the Supreme Court's opinion in Fly and the various rationales offered by the Court to justify its decision. Section III considers the plight of the trial judges in applying the principles, statements, and analysis announced in State v. Fly. Although trial judges must apply the rule of law, and therefore must abide by the "holding" in State v. Fly, this Article argues that trial judges have the same authority as …
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
Forensic Constitutional Interpretation, Brian F. Havel
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Caught In A Trap: The Romantic Reading Of The Eleventh Amendment, John Randolph Prince
Caught In A Trap: The Romantic Reading Of The Eleventh Amendment, John Randolph Prince
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
No Civilized System Of Justice: The Fate Of The Violence Against Women Act, Sally F. Goldfarb
No Civilized System Of Justice: The Fate Of The Violence Against Women Act, Sally F. Goldfarb
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Conceiving Non-Marital Fathers' Rights: An Inquiry Into The Constitutionality Of West Virginia's Adoption Statute, Lisa Kelly
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Who’S Taking Whom: Some Comments And Evidence On The Constitutionality Of Telric, David Gabel, David I. Rosenbaum
Who’S Taking Whom: Some Comments And Evidence On The Constitutionality Of Telric, David Gabel, David I. Rosenbaum
Federal Communications Law Journal
The FCC requires that the price of unbundled network elements be equal to the total element long-run incremental cost of production plus a reasonable contribution to common and joint costs. This pricing standard has the potential of making the telecommunications market more competitive. TELRIC prices, however, are set independently of historic costs and therefore may not compensate investors for incurred costs. Hence, incumbent local exchange carriers have been fighting its implementation. In all probability, the U.S. Supreme Court will become involved in the debate over its adoption. The Supreme Court has looked at changes in valuation methods in the past. …
Litigation In The United States And Mexico: A Comparative Overview, Robert M. Kossick, Jr.
Litigation In The United States And Mexico: A Comparative Overview, Robert M. Kossick, Jr.
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of "De Minimis" Injury In The Excessive Force Determination: Taylor V. Mcduffie And The Fourth Circuit Stand Alone, Troy J. Aramburu
The Role Of "De Minimis" Injury In The Excessive Force Determination: Taylor V. Mcduffie And The Fourth Circuit Stand Alone, Troy J. Aramburu
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The People Made Me Do It: Can The People Of The States Instruct And Coerce Their State Legislatures In The Article V Constitutional Amendment Process?, Vikram David Amar
The People Made Me Do It: Can The People Of The States Instruct And Coerce Their State Legislatures In The Article V Constitutional Amendment Process?, Vikram David Amar
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Declaring Unconstitutional A Constitutional Amendment: The Argentine Judiciary Forges Ahead, Ileana Gomez
Declaring Unconstitutional A Constitutional Amendment: The Argentine Judiciary Forges Ahead, Ileana Gomez
University of Miami Inter-American Law Review
No abstract provided.
Treaty-Making And The Nation: The Historical Foundations Of The Nationalist Conception Of The Treaty Power, David M. Golove
Treaty-Making And The Nation: The Historical Foundations Of The Nationalist Conception Of The Treaty Power, David M. Golove
Michigan Law Review
Characteristic of the most enduring constitutional controversies is a clash between fundamental but ultimately irreconcilable principles. Unable to synthesize opposing precepts, we visit and revisit certain issues in an endless cycle. Each generation marches forward heedless, and sometimes only dimly aware, of how many times the battle has already been fought. Even the peace of exhaustion achieves only a temporary respite. The abiding controversy over the relationship between the treaty power of the national government and the legislative powers of the states is paradigmatic in this respect. Beginning as early as in the first debate over ratification of the Articles …