Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
After "Life For Erie--A Reply, Peter Westen
After "Life For Erie--A Reply, Peter Westen
Michigan Law Review
Erie, having "preoccupied the intellectually dominant group of academic lawyers rising to maturity during the 1940's and 1950's," is reported to be losing its "symbolic centrality" for the newest generation of legal scholars. Professor Redish's prompt and excited response to our essay proves one thing: there is at least one scholar in the country who, having come to legal maturity during the last decade, still remains capable of becoming impassioned about Erie RR v. Tompkins.
Continuing The Erie Debate: A Response To Westen And Lehman, Martin H. Redish
Continuing The Erie Debate: A Response To Westen And Lehman, Martin H. Redish
Michigan Law Review
Although the Supreme Court has not spoken in detail on the Erie doctrine since its much-discussed decision in Hanna v. Plumer in 1965, commentary on the doctrine in the literature has undergone something of a "boomlet" in the last several years. Much of it has been stimulated by the groundbreaking article by Professor John Hart Ely in 1974. The latest contribution to the area is the recent article by Professor Peter Westen and Mr. Jeffrey Lehman appearing earlier this year in this journal. Unfortunately, their article does little to advance analysis of the Erie question, and contains numerous fundamental misstatements …
National League Of Cities And The Parker Doctrine: The Status Of State Sovereignty Under The Commerce Clause, Stephen G. Rooney
National League Of Cities And The Parker Doctrine: The Status Of State Sovereignty Under The Commerce Clause, Stephen G. Rooney
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This comment aims to convey a clear definition of the Supreme Court's views on federalism and state sovereignty. It argues that the Court has recently used antitrust cases and doctrines to establish state sovereignty as a limit to federal commerce power. This comment looks to both the doctrine created by the U.S. Supreme Court in the antitrust case Parker v. Brown and the Court's decision in National League of Cities v. Usery to clarify the role of state sovereignty in the face federal commerce power. It compares these two views of state sovereignty in order to develop a better understanding …
Is There Life For Erie After The Death Of Diversity?, Peter Westen, Jeffrey S. Lehman
Is There Life For Erie After The Death Of Diversity?, Peter Westen, Jeffrey S. Lehman
Michigan Law Review
This Article is essentially an elaboration of these three themes. Section I sets forth the fundamental principles, or "axioms," that determine whether a particular federal rule is pertinent and valid. Once these axioms are understood, it should become apparent that Erie problems, if not easy, are not uniquely difficult either; instead, they are the kinds of "ordinary" problems that are commonplace in other areas of law. Section II applies these axioms to cases in diversity to determine the validity of various kinds of federal rules of decision. Section III examines the validity of federal rules of decision in federal question …