Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Rights (3)
- Citizenship (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Due Process (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
-
- Immigration (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- 9/11 (1)
- AUMF (1)
- Afghanistan (1)
- Al-Odah (1)
- Allegiance (1)
- Andrew C. McCarthy (1)
- Arms (1)
- Bear (1)
- Bill of rights (1)
- Birth right (1)
- Boumediene (1)
- CIA (1)
- Citizen (1)
- Civil code (1)
- Collective (1)
- Congress (1)
- Contempt (1)
- Damages (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Dictum (1)
- Domestic (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Elitism (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Rights And Obligations Of Americans In Mexico Under Immigration Law And Other Areas Of Mexican Law, Jorge A. Vargas
Rights And Obligations Of Americans In Mexico Under Immigration Law And Other Areas Of Mexican Law, Jorge A. Vargas
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Birthright Citizenship, The Fourteenth Amendment, And State Authority, James C. Ho
Birthright Citizenship, The Fourteenth Amendment, And State Authority, James C. Ho
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Born In The U.S.A.? Rethinking Birthright Citizenship In The Wake Of 9/11, John C. Eastman
Born In The U.S.A.? Rethinking Birthright Citizenship In The Wake Of 9/11, John C. Eastman
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law V. National Security: When Lawyers Make Terrorism Policy, William G. Hyland Jr.
Law V. National Security: When Lawyers Make Terrorism Policy, William G. Hyland Jr.
Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business
Are lawyers strangling our government’s ability to fight the first war of the twenty-first century? Does judicial adventurism and the fear of litigation undermine the War Against Terrorism? In essence, is our national security apparatus overlawyered? This article analyzes how some lawyers have produced a synthetic “litigation culture” over the war on terror. It argues that litigation concerning electronic surveillance, interrogation and all manners of prisoner treatment has chilled counterintelligence since 9/11.
Parker V. District Of Columbia: Putting The "I'S" In Milita, Katharine E. Kohm
Parker V. District Of Columbia: Putting The "I'S" In Milita, Katharine E. Kohm
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Independent Of The Constitution?--Issues Raised By An Independent Federal Legislative Ethics Commission With Independent Enforcement Authority, Paul Taylor
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Overcoming Lochner In The Twenty-First Century: Taking Both Rights And Popular Sovereignty Seriously As We Seek To Secure Equal Citizenship And Promote The Public Good, Thomas B. Mcaffee
Overcoming Lochner In The Twenty-First Century: Taking Both Rights And Popular Sovereignty Seriously As We Seek To Secure Equal Citizenship And Promote The Public Good, Thomas B. Mcaffee
University of Richmond Law Review
Professor McAffee reviews substantive due process as the textual basis for modern fundamental rights constitutional decision-making. He contends that we should avoid both the undue literalism that rejects the idea of implied rights, as well as the attempt to substitute someone's preferred moral vision for the limits, and compromises, that are implicit in and intended by the Constitution's text. He argues, moreover, that we can largely harmonizethe variousgoals of our constitutionalsystem by taking rights se- riously and by understanding that securing rights does not ex-haustthe Constitution'spurposes.
Public Employee Speech, Categorical Balancing And § 1983: A Critique Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Sheldon H. Nahmod
Public Employee Speech, Categorical Balancing And § 1983: A Critique Of Garcetti V. Ceballos, Sheldon H. Nahmod
University of Richmond Law Review
I propose to discuss Garcetti's First Amendment reasoning as well as the implications of the § 1983' setting in which Garcetti and other public employee free speech cases typically arise. After briefly setting out the Court's opinion and the three dissenting opinions, I begin by addressing the pros and cons of Garcetti, and in the course of so doing, I discuss the prior Pickering-Connick landscape that Garcetti so significantly altered. I consider the deeper First Amendment implications of Garcetti, including itsuse of categorical balancing to create an absolute immunity fromFirst Amendment liability for employer discipline based on job-required public employee …