Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law
Achieving The Purpose Of Federal Diversity Jurisdiction: Why Courts Should Abandon The Current Treatment Of Llcs Under Section 1332, Kristen Curley
Achieving The Purpose Of Federal Diversity Jurisdiction: Why Courts Should Abandon The Current Treatment Of Llcs Under Section 1332, Kristen Curley
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fiduciary Duties And Reasonable Expectations: Cash-Out Mergers In Close Corporations, David C. Crago
Fiduciary Duties And Reasonable Expectations: Cash-Out Mergers In Close Corporations, David C. Crago
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Maryland Close Corporation Law, William G. Hall Jr
The New Maryland Close Corporation Law, William G. Hall Jr
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Drafting An Effective Buy-Sell Agreement With Emphasis On Estate Tax Valuation Of Close Corporate Stock, Sidney Clay Kinkead Jr.
Drafting An Effective Buy-Sell Agreement With Emphasis On Estate Tax Valuation Of Close Corporate Stock, Sidney Clay Kinkead Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Suggestions For Modernizing The Kentucky General Corporation Law To Meet The Needs Of Close Corporations, Willburt D. Ham
Suggestions For Modernizing The Kentucky General Corporation Law To Meet The Needs Of Close Corporations, Willburt D. Ham
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Close Corporation Under Kentucky Law, Willburt D. Ham
The Close Corporation Under Kentucky Law, Willburt D. Ham
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Corporations-Officers And Directors-Validity Of Voting Agreements To Continue Shareholders As Directors, John F. Dodge
Corporations-Officers And Directors-Validity Of Voting Agreements To Continue Shareholders As Directors, John F. Dodge
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, the president of a corporation and owner of 31½ of the 100 shares of corporate stock outstanding, brought an action against A, the vice-president who owned 48½ shares, and B, the owner of the remaining 20 shares, for specific performance of an oral agreement between the plaintiff and A that the plaintiff and a third person, X, should be continued as directors. The vice-president, A, had allied himself with B, and in disregard of the agreement had served notice requesting a stockholders' meeting for the purpose of removing the plaintiff and X as directors. …