Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. (2)
- Administrative Procedures Act (1)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (1)
- Asylum Refugee Act (1)
-
- Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 (1)
- Black Lung Benefits Amendments of 1981 (1)
- Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977 (1)
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. (1)
- Bragdon v. Abbott (1)
- Cigarettes (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Coal dust (1)
- Cuba (1)
- Doris Coal v. Director (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1)
- Federal Coal Mine Health Safety Act of 1969 (1)
- Fourth Circuit (1)
- Haiti (1)
- Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act of 1998 (1)
- Human immunodeficiency virus (1)
- Humanitarian (1)
- Immigration and Nationality Act (1)
- Immigration and Naturalization Service (1)
- Interpretive Guidance (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Legislative intent (1)
- Medical treatment (1)
- Miner (1)
- Nicaragua (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reducing The Overburden: The Doris Coal Presumption And Administrative Efficiency Under The Black Lung Benefits Act, Eric R. Olson
Reducing The Overburden: The Doris Coal Presumption And Administrative Efficiency Under The Black Lung Benefits Act, Eric R. Olson
Michigan Law Review
Coal dust build-up prevents many coal miners' lungs from functioning properly. This condition, commonly referred to as black lung or pneumoconiosis, can make common activities nearly impossible. The Black Lung Benefits Act covers the cost of medical treatment for many affected miners, though procedural impediments often prevent miners from receiving care. The miner's current or former employer, when identifiable, must pay for medical care relating to the miner's black lung. Most disputes over miners' claims for medical care arise when the miner has a history of cigarette smoking and the need for medical care could arise from either coal dust …
Deference And Disability Discrimination, Rebecca Hanner White
Deference And Disability Discrimination, Rebecca Hanner White
Michigan Law Review
For thirty-five years, the civil rights community has paid scant attention to administrative law principles. Those interested in advancing on-the-job equality for this country's working men and women (or in preserving employer autonomy vis-a-vis federal encroachment) have all but ignored what many consider the arcane technicalities of administrative law. This state of affairs is strange when one considers that administration and enforcement of each of our major federal laws outlawing employment discrimination have been confided to an administrative agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"). The EEOC, however, has historically been given short shrift by litigants and by the judiciary. …
The Exclusion Of Hiv-Positive Immigrants Under The Nicaraguan Adjustment And Central American Relief Act And The Haitian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act, Statutory Interpretation, Communicable Disease, Public Health, Legislative Intent, Shayna S. Cook
Michigan Law Review
The United States has turned away immigrants infected with the human immunodeficiency virus ("HIV") under the public health exclusion of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") since the mid-1980's. Since Congress codified the HIV exclusion in 1993, any alien applying for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident, or refugee status must first have a blood test for HIV. The HIV exclusion is not absolute, however. Each HIV-positive alien can apply for one of two waivers of the HIV exclusion that are available in the INA. When an alien applies for immigrant or permanent resident …