Law Commons^™

Competition And Regulation In The Stock Markets, Robert Pozen

Michigan Law Review

Part I of this article suggests that the courts have not satisfactorily resolved the tension between competition and regulation in the stock markets, and that the proposed legislation would in fact aggravate that tension. Part II uses an economic model of stock transactions to derive an alternative approach for reconciling competitive and regulatory considerations. Part III applies this approach to several key governmental decisions in the transition from fixed commission rates to the central market system.

Recent Developments, James D. Holland

Vanderbilt Law Review

The power to parole prisoners derives from the legislative power to define crimes and set penalties for offenses, and has been delegated by Congress and state legislatures to the federal and state parole boards.' Recent litigation of inmates' post-conviction rights in federal and state correctional systems has focused increasingly on the broad discretionary power that parole boards exercise by performing their statutory mandate... The recent development of a flexible concept of due process,' however, has permitted a finer balancing of governmental and individual interests than the prior requirement of a "full panoply" of procedural safeguards, or none at all, and …

Appeal No. 0013: Baldwin Producing Corporation V. State Of Ohio, Acting By And Through The Chief Of The Division Of Oil And Gas Department Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Adjudication Orders #130, and Amendments No.1 & 2 to Order #130

Judicial Review Of Administrative Action And Responsible Government, Warner W. Gardner, Michael Greenberger

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Gordon V. New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (Nyse), Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

United States V. National Association Of Securities Dealers, Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

United Housing Foundation V. Forman, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Antoine V. Washington, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

What Is The Public Interest? Who Represents It?, Roger C. Cramton

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Yonge V. Askew, 293 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. App. 1974), Florida State University Law Review

Florida State University Law Review

Administrative Law- JUDICIAL REVIEW- REPORTS OF STATE AGENCIES CONSTITUTE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT DENIAL OF DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT APPLICATION EVEN THOUGH REPORTING AGENCY HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER PROPOSED PROJECT.

Reasoning By Riddle: The Power To Prohibit In Georgia Local Government Law, R. Perry Sentell Jr.

Scholarly Works

One of the most significant and potentially objectionable powers exercised by any level of government is the power to regulate or prohibit the trades and occupations of its citizens. Of course, the only avenue for contesting the validity of such regulations is through the courts, at which time the basic tension of the individual’s right to earn a living vs. the government’s power to control his business comes quickly to the forefront. In his Article, Professor Sentell, dealing strictly with the power of Georgia local governments, points out that the Georgia courts have confounded the area by inconsistent consideration of …

The Menace Of Administrative Law (1920), John Lord O'Brian

Buffalo Law Review

Reprinted from the Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Maryland State Bar Association, 1920.

Prejudgment: An Unavailable Challenge To Official Administrative Action, Charles H. Koch Jr.

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Evolution Of The Administrative Process Under The New Texas Savings And Loan Act., John C. Phillips

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Applying The Administrative Procedure Act To Federal Parole Decision Making., Campbell Mcginnis

St. Mary's Law Journal

Abstract Forthcoming.

Counter-Advertising In The Broadcast Media: Brining The Administrative Process To Bear Upon A Theoretical Imperative, Tom A. Collins

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Development Of The Rio Grande Compact, Raymond A. Hill

Publications

Thirty-six years have elapsed since the Rio Grande Compact of 1938, N.M.S.A. Section 75-34-3 (Repl. 1968), was entered into by Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas, and approved by the United States of America. Administration of the Compact since then has been the responsibility of many different persons, few of whom had personal knowledge of the circumstances of the negotiation of this Compact. Consequently, there has been a growing tendency towards interpretation of some of the provisions of the Rio Grande Compact in a manner contrary to the intent of those who participated in its negotiation.

Mr. Hill has intimately connected …

How Federal Judicial Administration Came To Be The Way It Is, Robert A. Leflar

Vanderbilt Law Review

Differences about how the business of federal circuit and district courts should be administered--as distinguished from how their cases should be decided--down through the years have presented a persistent conflict between an ideal of national uniformity and an effort to maintain local control over administrative details. In one sense this has been a contest between reformers who have sought increased efficiency in federal judicial administration and local judges whose rallying cry was judicial independence and whose personal interest was in continuing to run things as they were accustomed within their own little domains. Occasionally patronage was involved. This did not …

Simulation And Role Playing In Administrative Law, Michael Botein

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.

The Illinois Unified Code Of Corrections - A Legislative Step In The Development Of Prisoners' Rights And Of Prison Administration, Diane Morrison

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Simulation & Roleplaying In Administrative Law, Michael Botein

Other Publications

No abstract provided.

02. List Of Congressman Don Edwards' Watergate Papers Donated To Heafey Law Library, Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

Congressman Don Edwards' Watergate Papers donated to the Heafey Law Library at Santa Clara University's School of Law on September 1974.

11. Book Iii, Vol. 5: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, June 20, 1972 - March 22, 1973 (Allegations Concerning Payments Of "Hush" Money To Watergate Defendants To Insure Their Silence, Offers Of Leniency And Executive Clemency, And The Making Or Causing To Be, Of False Statements To Persons Connected With An Official Investigation Of Watergate; Chronology Of Events Between February 9 And March 22, 1973), Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.

10. Book Iii, Vol. 4: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, June 20, 1972 - March 22, 1973 (Allegations Concerning Payments Of "Hush" Money To Watergate Defendants To Insure Their Silence, Offers Of Leniency And Executive Clemency, And The Making Or Causing To Be, Of False Statements To Persons Connected With An Official Investigation Of Watergate; Chronology Of Events Between February 9 And March 22, 1973), Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.

09. Book Iii, Vol. 3: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, June 20, 1972 - March 22, 1973 (Allegations Concerning Payments Of "Hush" Money To Watergate Defendants To Insure Their Silence, Offers Of Leniency And Executive Clemency, And The Making Or Causing To Be, Of False Statements To Persons Connected With An Official Investigation Of Watergate; Chronology Of Events Between February 9 And March 22, 1973), Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.

04. Book Ii, Vol. 1: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, June 17, 1972 - February 9, 1973 (Allegations Involving Presidential Interference With The Official Department Of Justice Investigation), Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.

06. Book Ii, Vol. 3: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, June 17, 1972 - February 9, 1973 (Allegations Involving Presidential Interference With The Official Department Of Justice Investigation), Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.

12. Book Iv, Vol. 1: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, March 22, 1973 -April 30, 1973 (Events Relating To The President's Investigation Of The Alleged Watergate Break-In And Cover-Up Between March 22 And April 30, 1973)., Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.

07. Book Iii, Vol. 1: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, June 20, 1972 - March 22, 1973 (Allegations Concerning Payments Of "Hush" Money To Watergate Defendants To Insure Their Silence, Offers Of Leniency And Executive Clemency, And The Making Or Causing To Be, Of False Statements To Persons Connected With An Official Investigation Of Watergate; Chronology Of Events Between February 9 And March 22, 1973), Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.

08. Book Iii, Vol. 2: Events Following The Watergate Break-In, June 20, 1972 - March 22, 1973 (Allegations Concerning Payments Of "Hush" Money To Watergate Defendants To Insure Their Silence, Offers Of Leniency And Executive Clemency, And The Making Or Causing To Be, Of False Statements To Persons Connected With An Official Investigation Of Watergate; Chronology Of Events Between February 9 And March 22, 1973), Don Edwards

Watergate Hearings

No abstract provided.