Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.8 (September 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.8 (September 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle for Human Rights (1997-2000)
No abstract provided.
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.7 (August 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.7 (August 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle for Human Rights (1997-2000)
No abstract provided.
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.6 (July 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.6 (July 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle for Human Rights (1997-2000)
No abstract provided.
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.5 (June 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.5 (June 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle for Human Rights (1997-2000)
No abstract provided.
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.4 (May 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.4 (May 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle for Human Rights (1997-2000)
No abstract provided.
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.3 (April 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.3 (April 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle for Human Rights (1997-2000)
No abstract provided.
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.2 (March 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle For Human Rights, Vol.1, No.2 (March 1997), M. Lichtman
Common Circle for Human Rights (1997-2000)
No abstract provided.
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Relativism, Reflective Equilibrium, And Justice, Justin Schwartz
Justin Schwartz
THIS PAPER IS THE CO-WINNER OF THE FRED BERGER PRIZE IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW FOR THE 1999 AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BEST PUBLISHED PAPER IN THE PREVIOUS TWO YEARS.
The conflict between liberal legal theory and critical legal studies (CLS) is often framed as a matter of whether there is a theory of justice that the law should embody which all rational people could or must accept. In a divided society, the CLS critique of this view is overwhelming: there is no such justice that can command universal assent. But the liberal critique of CLS, that it degenerates into …