Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Arts and Humanities
Deliberation, Practical Reasoning And Problem-Solving, Douglas Walton, Alice Toniolo
Deliberation, Practical Reasoning And Problem-Solving, Douglas Walton, Alice Toniolo
OSSA Conference Archive
We present a series of realistic examples of deliberation and discuss how they can form the basis for building a typology of deliberation dialogues. The observations from our examples are used to suggest that argumentation researchers and philosophers have been thinking about deliberation in overly simplistic ways. We argue that to include all the kinds of argumentation that make up realistic deliberations, it is necessary to distinguish between different kinds of deliberations. We propose a model including a problem-solving type of deliberation based on practical reasoning, characterised by revisions of the initial issue made necessary by the agents’ increased knowledge …
Commentary On Douglas N. Walton And Alice Toniolo’S “Deliberation, Practical Reasoning And Problem-Solving”, Hubert Marraud
Commentary On Douglas N. Walton And Alice Toniolo’S “Deliberation, Practical Reasoning And Problem-Solving”, Hubert Marraud
OSSA Conference Archive
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Jan Albert Van Laar And Erik C. W. Krabbe, “Splitting A Difference Of Opinion”, David Godden
Commentary On Jan Albert Van Laar And Erik C. W. Krabbe, “Splitting A Difference Of Opinion”, David Godden
OSSA Conference Archive
Jan Albert van Laar and Erik Krabbe’s paper “Splitting a difference of opinion” studies an important type of dialogue shift, namely that from a deliberation dialogue over action or policy options where critical and persuasive argumentation is exchanged about the rational acceptability of the policy options proposed by various parties, to a negotiation dialogue where agreement is reached by a series of compromises, or trade-offs, on the part of each side in the disagreement.