Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Economic (4)
- Intellectual property (4)
- Philosophy (4)
- Contract (3)
- Tort (3)
-
- Free receipt (2)
- Free speech (2)
- Gift (2)
- Gone with the Wind (2)
- Hostile use (2)
- Incentive (2)
- Instrumentalist (2)
- John Locke (2)
- Labor theory (2)
- New York Times v. Sullivan (2)
- Reciprocity (2)
- Authorship (1)
- Copyright justification (1)
- Derivative works (1)
- Idea/expression dichotomy (1)
- Pre-emption (1)
- Property (1)
- Suppression (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Arts and Humanities
Footnote Draft Of Render Copyright Unto Caesar - 2004, Wendy J. Gordon
Footnote Draft Of Render Copyright Unto Caesar - 2004, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
This essay, however, does not press any particular agenda; rather, it tries to make our thinking about the topic more flexible. It is my hope that some conduct-specific rule as was adopted in the defamation context will eventually be adopted for intellectual property. Copyright law cannot continue forever closing its eyes and hoping its house will stop being haunted.
Render Copyright Unto Caesar: On Taking Incentives Seriously, Wendy J. Gordon
Render Copyright Unto Caesar: On Taking Incentives Seriously, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay suggests we bifurcate our thinking. Conventional copyright rules by money, so let it rule the money-bound. Let a different set of rules evolve for more complex uses, particularly when the users have a personal relationship with the utilized text. Much recent scholarship contains dramatic suggestions to secure a freedom to be creative, rewrite, and be imaginative. My work has long sought to defend such freedoms, but I believe we understand imagination and its conditions too little to employ it as a starting point. I suggest instead that we acquire a better conceptual map of the generative process and …
Draft Of Rendering Copyright Into Caesar - 2003, Wendy J. Gordon
Draft Of Rendering Copyright Into Caesar - 2003, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
This article makes a simple suggestion. Copyright rules by money, so let it rule the money-bound. Let a different set of rules evolve for more complex uses, particularly when the users have a personal relationship with the utilized text. Copyright. When new artists make transformative use of existing works in settings not characterized by pre-use commercial negotiations, copyright should avoid imposing a distorting burden.
New Thoughts And Excerpt From On Commodifying Intangibles - 1999, Wendy J. Gordon
New Thoughts And Excerpt From On Commodifying Intangibles - 1999, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Here is a ten-page excerpt from! a published piece, followed by some more recent and more random thoughts. Community is not civility. That is, I imagine my ideal community as one where people aren't always sweet to each other; I imagine a community where truth is more important than hurt feelings, and fun is more important than money. I imagine a community of individualists: raucous, iconoclastic. Steve Shiffrin's ROMANCE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT and Ed Baker's work seems to have the kind of community in mind that I am interested in.
Proposed Organization And Detailed Table Of Contents - 1990, Wendy J. Gordon
Proposed Organization And Detailed Table Of Contents - 1990, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
For many years copyright was a backwater of the law. Perceived as an esoteric and narrow field beset by hypertechnical formalities, the discipline and its practitioners were largely isolated from scholarly and case law developments in other areas. There were exceptions of course. Well before the explosion of intellectual property litigation in the last twenty years, persons such as Zcharia Chaffee Jr. and Judge Learned Hand brought a wealth of learning and a broad perspective to copyright.
Draft Of New Versus Old Authors - 1990, Wendy J. Gordon
Draft Of New Versus Old Authors - 1990, Wendy J. Gordon
Scholarship Chronologically
Virtually all the issues canvassed above embody the tension that exists in seeking to honor the interests of two generations of creators. For example, the essay has discussed the need for new adaptive artists to have a copyright in their own productions and the dangers that the "subconscious copying rule" poses to new creators, particularly in an age of ubiquitous media.