Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Golden Gate University School of Law (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
-
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Opinions (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Anti-discrimination (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Establishment Clause (2)
-
- Free Exercise Clause (2)
- Judicial decision-making (2)
- Judicial ideology (2)
- Religious accommodation (2)
- Religious liberty (2)
- Accountability (1)
- Administrative law judge (1)
- Administrative procedure (1)
- American society (1)
- Article II (1)
- Biography (1)
- Biography Jesse Carter (1)
- Black (1)
- Britain (1)
- Capital crimes (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
- Capital sentencing (1)
- Catholic church (1)
- Catholic judges (1)
- Catholic teaching (1)
- Civil rights movement (1)
- Code of Judicial Conduct (1)
- Countermajoritarian (1)
- Court clerk (1)
- Engel v. Vitale (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- The Jesse Carter Collection (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
-
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (1)
- Michael Heise (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Major Questions About Presidentialism: Untangling The “Chain Of Dependence” Across Administrative Law, Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Jodi L. Short
Major Questions About Presidentialism: Untangling The “Chain Of Dependence” Across Administrative Law, Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Jodi L. Short
Faculty Scholarship
A contradiction about the role of the president has emerged between the Roberts Court’s Article II jurisprudence and its Major Questions Doctrine jurisprudence. In its appointment and removal decisions, the Roberts Court claims that the president is the “most democratic and politically accountable official in Government” because the president is “directly accountable to the people through regular elections,” an audacious new interpretation of Article II; and it argues that tight presidential control of agency officials lends democratic legitimacy to the administrative state. We identify these twin arguments about the “directly accountable president” and the “chain of dependence” as the foundation …
Experiments With Suppression: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In Britain In The Revolutionary Period, Christopher M. Roberts
Experiments With Suppression: The Evolution Of Repressive Legality In Britain In The Revolutionary Period, Christopher M. Roberts
Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review
This article is concerned with the structure of repressive governance, and how it has evolved historically. It examines this theme through an exploration of the manner which repressive laws and institutions evolved in Britain over the course of the late eighteenth century. In particular, it reviews the various measures that British authorities utilized and relied upon in order to confront a growing wave of calls for social and political reforms. These included a policy of aggressive prosecutions of dissidents; the creation of new institutions such as the Home Office designed to enhance the powers of the central authorities; extralegal measures …
A Challenge To Bleached Out Professional Identity: How Jewish Was Justice Louis D. Brandeis?, Russell G. Pearce, Adam B. Winer, Emily Jenab
A Challenge To Bleached Out Professional Identity: How Jewish Was Justice Louis D. Brandeis?, Russell G. Pearce, Adam B. Winer, Emily Jenab
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk
Michael Heise
We analyze various factors that influence judicial decisions in cases involving Free Exercise Clause or religious accommodation claims and decided by lower federal courts. Religious liberty claims, including those moored in the Free Exercise Clause, typically generate particularly difficult questions about how best to structure the sometimes contentious relation between the religious faithful and the sovereign government. Such difficult questions arise frequently in and are often framed by litigation. Our analyses include all digested Free Exercise and religious accommodation claim decisions by federal court of appeals and district court judges from 1996 through 2005. As it relates to one key …
God, Civic Virtue, And The American Way: Reconstructing Engel, Corinna Barrett Lain
God, Civic Virtue, And The American Way: Reconstructing Engel, Corinna Barrett Lain
Law Faculty Publications
If ever a decision embodied the heroic, counter majoritarian function we romantically ascribe to judicial review, it was the 1962 decision that struck down school prayer-Engel v. Vitale. Engel provoked more outrage, more congres- sionalattemptsto overturnit, andmoreattackson theJusticesthanperhapsany other decision in Supreme Court history. Indeed, Engel's counter majoritarian narrative is so strong that scholars have largely assumed that the historical record supports our romanticized conception of the case.Itdoesnot. Usingprimary source materials, this Article reconstructs the story of Engel, then explores the implicationsof this reconstructednarrative. Engel is not the countermajoritarian case it seems, but recognizing that allows us to see Engel …
The Role Of The Administrative Law Judge, Ronnie A. Yoder
The Role Of The Administrative Law Judge, Ronnie A. Yoder
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation, Constance Mauney
Religion And First Amendment Prosecutions: An Analysis Of Justice Black's Constitutional Interpretation, Constance Mauney
Pepperdine Law Review
Justice Hugo L. Black served on the United States Supreme Court over a period of thirty-four years, encompassing Supreme Court terms from 1937 to 1971. During this period, the subject of the constitutional limitations of the freedom of religion was increasingly subjected to intense social pressures. Justice Black figured prominently in the development of constitutional law as the Supreme Court attempted to give meaning to the establishment and free exercise clause of the first amendment. He wrote the majority opinions which dealt with the establishment clause in the Everson, McCulloin, Engel and Torcaso cases. Yet, on later occasions, Justice Black …
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk
Free Exercise Of Religion Before The Bench: Empirical Evidence From The Federal Courts, Michael Heise, Gregory C. Sisk
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
We analyze various factors that influence judicial decisions in cases involving Free Exercise Clause or religious accommodation claims and decided by lower federal courts. Religious liberty claims, including those moored in the Free Exercise Clause, typically generate particularly difficult questions about how best to structure the sometimes contentious relation between the religious faithful and the sovereign government. Such difficult questions arise frequently in and are often framed by litigation. Our analyses include all digested Free Exercise and religious accommodation claim decisions by federal court of appeals and district court judges from 1996 through 2005. As it relates to one key …
The Religious Liberty Of Judges, Daniel R. Suhr
The Religious Liberty Of Judges, Daniel R. Suhr
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
This Article begins by reviewing the government employee line of cases, starting with United Public Workers v. Mitchell in 1947.29 The first section concludes that the modified Pickering balancing test set forth in United States v. National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) is the appropriate level of scrutiny for judicial conduct rules. The body of this Article reviews ways in which the four canons of the ABA Model Code of Judicial Ethics and official interpretations of and rulings regarding them limit the religious activities of judges. I conclude that numerous applications of the Model Code are unconstitutional infringements on judges’ First …
William Thaddeus Coleman, Jr.: Breaking The Color Barrier At The U.S. Supreme Court, Todd C. Peppers
William Thaddeus Coleman, Jr.: Breaking The Color Barrier At The U.S. Supreme Court, Todd C. Peppers
Scholarly Articles
The purpose of this essay is twofold: It will endeavor to succinctly summarize the important events of Coleman’s life and professional career, while making the argument that these achievements were as groundbreaking in the legal community as Robinson’s were to baseball. Admittedly, looking to our national pastime is hardly an original literary maneuver; The myriad similarities and links between baseball and the law have offered rich material for many legal writers.2 Moreover, this article does not wish to diminish Coleman’s accomplishments by comparing them to a mere “game.” By drawing upon the sixtieth anniversary of Robinson’s debut, my hope is …
Catholic Judges In Capital Cases, John H. Garvey
Catholic Judges In Capital Cases, John H. Garvey
Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Catholic Judges In Capital Cases, Amy Coney Barrett, John H. Garvey
Catholic Judges In Capital Cases, Amy Coney Barrett, John H. Garvey
Journal Articles
The Catholic Church's opposition to the death penalty places Catholic judges in a moral and legal bind. While these judges are obliged by oath, professional commitment, and the demands of citizenship to enforce the death penalty, they are also obliged to adhere to their church's teaching on moral matters. Although the legal system has a solution for this dilemma by allowing the recusal of judges whose convictions keep them from doing their job, Catholic judges will want to sit whenever possible without acting immorally. However, litigants and the general public are entitled to impartial justice, which may be something a …
Parading Ourselves: Freedom Of Speech At The Feast Of St. Patrick, Larry Yackle
Parading Ourselves: Freedom Of Speech At The Feast Of St. Patrick, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
Three things are true. First, American society is now absorbed in yet another great civil rights movement, this one on behalf of gay, lesbian, and ambisexual citizens, which will lead ineluctably to the elimination of legal burdens on the basis of sexual orientation.' Change will come slowly, with much backing and filling, and at an awful price measured in human pain. Intolerance for the homosexualities that exist among us, and the homosexual behavior in which many of us engage, will persist in quarters where the law cannot reach.2 Yet private homophobia, deprived of legal sanction, will ultimately be discredited and …
Justice Brennan, Due Process And The Freedom Of Speech: A Celebration Of Speiser V. Randall, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 7 (1986), George Anastaplo
Justice Brennan, Due Process And The Freedom Of Speech: A Celebration Of Speiser V. Randall, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 7 (1986), George Anastaplo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Harold H. Burton And The Work Of The Supreme Court, David N. Atkinson
Justice Harold H. Burton And The Work Of The Supreme Court, David N. Atkinson
Cleveland State Law Review
Harold H. Burton served for thirteen years on the United States Supreme Court during a turbulent period of innovative constitutional policymaking. Hard working and open-minded, he was inevitably involved in the cross currents of small group interaction within the Supreme Court. Consequently, the purpose of this essay -relying on law clerk questionnaires and interviews -is to describe and evaluate his intra-Court behavior.
Mr. Justice Brennan And The Condition Of Unconstitutional Conditions, Robert M. O'Neil
Mr. Justice Brennan And The Condition Of Unconstitutional Conditions, Robert M. O'Neil
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
In Memoriam - Jesse W. Carter, Daniel S. Carlton, Leon Green
In Memoriam - Jesse W. Carter, Daniel S. Carlton, Leon Green
The Jesse Carter Collection
No abstract provided.
Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court. Harry L. Wallace, Harry L. Wallace
Mr. Justice Minton-Hoosier Justice On The Supreme Court. Harry L. Wallace, Harry L. Wallace
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Address Delivered At Town & Gown At The University Of Southern California Campus Entitled "A Great Supreme Court"
The Jesse Carter Collection
No abstract provided.
Dissent In First Unitarian Church Of Los Angeles V. County Of Los Angeles
Dissent In First Unitarian Church Of Los Angeles V. County Of Los Angeles
The Jesse Carter Collection
48 Cal. 2d. 419
Mr. Justice Rutledge - The Man, Irving Brant
Mr. Justice Rutledge - The Man, Irving Brant
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Benjamin Franklin Graves, Hoyt Post
Benjamin Franklin Graves, Hoyt Post
Michigan Law Review
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN GRAVES, the oldest and last surviving of the four noted judges-Cooley, Campbell, Christiancy and Graves-who composed the Supreme Court of Michigan in 1868 and succeeding years, died in Detroit, Michigan, on the third day of March, 1906, at the age of eighty-eight years and five months.