Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Bono (2)
- Broadcasting (2)
- FCC (2)
- FCC, indecency, obscenity, profanity, broadcasting, Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction, free speech, first amendment, Bono (2)
- First amendment (2)
-
- Free speech (2)
- Indecency (2)
- Obscenity (2)
- Profanity (2)
- Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction (2)
- Anti-discrimination (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Copyright Law (1)
- English courts (1)
- India (1)
- Individual Liberty (1)
- Injunctions (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Queer theory (1)
- Sexual autonomy (1)
- Sexuality (1)
- Sodomy (1)
- World War I (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Panel Iii: Indecent Exposure? The Fcc's Recent Enforcement Of Obscenity Laws, William Davenport, Jeffrey Hoeh, C. Edwin Baker, Paul J. Mcgeady
Panel Iii: Indecent Exposure? The Fcc's Recent Enforcement Of Obscenity Laws, William Davenport, Jeffrey Hoeh, C. Edwin Baker, Paul J. Mcgeady
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Panel Iii: Indecent Exposure? The Fcc's Recent Enforcement Of Obscenity Laws, William Davenport, Jeffrey Hoeh, C. Edwin Baker, Paul J. Mcgeady
Panel Iii: Indecent Exposure? The Fcc's Recent Enforcement Of Obscenity Laws, William Davenport, Jeffrey Hoeh, C. Edwin Baker, Paul J. Mcgeady
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Need For Mareva Injunctions Reconsidered , David Capper
The Need For Mareva Injunctions Reconsidered , David Capper
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Size Matters (Or Should) In Copyright Law , Justin Hughes
Size Matters (Or Should) In Copyright Law , Justin Hughes
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Law And War: Individual Rights, Executive Authority, And Judicial Power In England During World War I , Rachel Vorspan
Law And War: Individual Rights, Executive Authority, And Judicial Power In England During World War I , Rachel Vorspan
Faculty Scholarship
This Article examines the role of the English courts during World War I, particularly the judicial response to executive infringements on individual liberty. Focusing on the areas of detention, deportation, conscription, and confiscation of property, the Article revises the conventional depiction of the English judiciary during World War I as passive and peripheral. It argues that in four ways the judges were activist and energetic, both in advancing the government's war effort and in promoting their own policies and powers. First, they were judicial warriors, developing innovative legal strategies to legitimize detention and other governmental restrictions on personal. Second, they …
Sexuality And Sovereignty: The Global Limits And Possibilities Of Lawrence Symposium: Legal Rights In Historical Perspective: From The Margins To The Mainstream, Sonia K. Katyal
Faculty Scholarship
In the summer of 2003, the Supreme Court handed gay and lesbian activists a stunning victory in the decision of Lawrence v. Texas, which summarily overruled Bowers v. Hardwick. At issue was whether Texas' prohibition of same-sex sexual conduct violated the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In a powerful, poetic, and strident opinion, Justice Kennedy, writing for a six-member majority, reversed Bowers, observing that individual decisions regarding physical intimacy between consenting adults, either of the same or opposite sex, are constitutionally protected, and thus fall outside of the reach of state intervention. Volumes can be written about the …