Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Terror At The Emperor's Birthday Party: An Analysis Of The Hostage-Taking Incident At The Japanese Embassy In Lima, Peru, Dr. Ranee K.L. Panjabi
Terror At The Emperor's Birthday Party: An Analysis Of The Hostage-Taking Incident At The Japanese Embassy In Lima, Peru, Dr. Ranee K.L. Panjabi
Penn State International Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Political Offence Exception And Terrorism: Its Place In The Current Extradition Scheme And Proposals For Its Future, R. Stuart Phillips
The Political Offence Exception And Terrorism: Its Place In The Current Extradition Scheme And Proposals For Its Future, R. Stuart Phillips
Penn State International Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Unnecessary Sacrifice: Restrictions On The Right Of Freedom Of Movement In An Effort To Establish An Effective Global Aids Policy, Cindy P. Nelson
An Unnecessary Sacrifice: Restrictions On The Right Of Freedom Of Movement In An Effort To Establish An Effective Global Aids Policy, Cindy P. Nelson
Penn State International Law Review
No abstract provided.
National Copyright Law V. Community Law: Which Law Is Controlling In Intellectual Property Derivative Market Products?, Lynne Kimberly Law
National Copyright Law V. Community Law: Which Law Is Controlling In Intellectual Property Derivative Market Products?, Lynne Kimberly Law
Penn State International Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Flying Dutchman Dichotomy: The International Right To Leave V. The Sovereign Right To Exclude, Suzanne Mcgrath Dale
The Flying Dutchman Dichotomy: The International Right To Leave V. The Sovereign Right To Exclude, Suzanne Mcgrath Dale
Penn State International Law Review
Traditional international law rules that people must be free to move about the world without undue hindrance, coming and going with reasonable freedom. At the same time, the concept of the sovereign nation includes a right to say who will enter the nation's borders, who will be barred. These two principles are at odds with each other: who is to say that because one may travel freely, any given nation must allow that person to enter? It is conceivable that no nation may allow the traveller to enter. There is no law or right which dictates that every traveller must …