Digital Commons Network^™

Rule Of Law Capacity Building In Iraq, Richard Pregent

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

Exceptions: The Criminal Law's Illogical Approach To Hiv-Related Aggravated Assaults, Ari E. Waldman

Ari E Waldman

This article identifies logical and due process errors in cases involving HIV-related aggravated assaults, which usually involve an HIV-positive individual having unprotected sex without disclosing his or her HIV status. While this behavior should not be encouraged, this paper suggests that punishing this conduct through a charge of aggravated assault – which requires a showing that the defendant’s actions were a means likely to cause grievous bodily harm or death – is fraught with fallacies in reasoning and runs afoul of due process. Specifically, some courts use the rule of thumb that HIV can possibly be transmitted through bodily fluids …

Human Trafficking: Iraq - A Case Study, Ali Allawi

Ali Allawi

The accompanying Article explores the issue of human trafficking and sexual exploitation in postwar Iraq. It attempts, in three steps to firstly identify the issue of human trafficking and how it pertains to Iraq, secondly to examine Iraq’s international legal obligations to address the human rights violations and human trafficking issues, and lastly, recommend implementable solutions that the Iraqi government can take to meet its international obligations and remedy the problem at hand. The Article sheds new light on the growing humanitarian crisis in post war Iraq and brings awareness of the monumental challenges that face both the government and …

Addressing The Special Problems Of Mentally Ill Prisoners: A Small Piece Of The Solution To Our Nation's Prison Crisis, Michael Vitiello

Michael Vitiello

After years of neglect, policymakers must confront a crisis in our prisons created by the increasing number of mentally ill prisoners. Mentally ill prisoners are both vulnerable and troublesome. Apart from their special needs, they are an increasing segment of the prison population. Their numbers have risen roughly in proportion with the release of the mentally ill from mental hospitals and the closing of those institutions. As states look for ways to reduce prison costs, meaningful reform may be in the air. That may allow a reexamination of policies that have led to the increase in mentally ill-prisoners. But if …

Can Cia Interrogators Relying Upon Government Counsel Advice Be Prosecuted For Torture?, Adam M. Hochroth

Adam M Hochroth

In the spring of 2002, the CIA sought advice from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) regarding an interrogation program for high-level al Qaeda detainees. The proposed program included the use of techniques such as walling, stress positions, confinement, sleep deprivation and waterboarding. On August 1, 2002, the OLC provided two memoranda of advice to the CIA on the lawfulness of the proposed program and the specific techniques intended. The OLC advised that the program and the techniques were lawful and did not constitute torture within the meaning of the Torture Statute, 18 U.S.C. §§2340–2340A. This article considers whether interrogators …

A Kind Of Judgment: Searching For Judicial Narratives After Death, Timothy W. Waters

Timothy W Waters

This Article is a work of original research interrogating the relationship between international criminal law and post-conflict reconciliation. Much of international criminal law’s attraction rests on the authoritative narrative theory: the claim that law’s authoritative judgments create incontestable narratives, which form the foundation for reconciliation in divided societies. So what happens when there is no judgment? By turning scholarship’s attention towards a terminated trial, this Article develops an indirect but powerful challenge to one of the dominant views about what international criminal law is for, with interdisciplinary implications for international law, international relations, diplomacy and political science. What can be …

A “Supremer” Court?: How An Unfavorable Ruling In The Inter-American Commission On Human Rights Should Impact United States Domestic Violence Jurisprudence, Ethan G. Kate

Ethan G. Kate

After her substantive and procedural due process claims were dismissed in the Supreme Court, Jessica Gonzales took the unprecedented step of filing a claim with the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, the first time such an allegation of human rights violations had been brought against the United States. Gonzales’ case has implicated two hot-button issues in modern United States jurisprudence: domestic violence prevention and the role of international law in domestic courts. Several scholars have looked at Gonzales’ case as it relates either to domestic violence or international law, but few have looked at the interplay between both issues. Specifically, …

A Protocol Against Trafficking In Persons: Is It Enough?, Michelle K. Forrest

Michelle K Forrest

Human Trafficking is a flourishing, criminal business that brings in more than thirty-two billion dollars yearly. This paper will discuss how the trafficking enterprise is difficult to eliminate because of its growing sophistication; unique flexibility and mobility; infiltration of lawful business; lucrative profit; and transnational operation. Potential infringement upon fundamental ideals of American society, such as privacy and liberty, weakens the fight against trafficking. As a result, trafficking has become a grave threat to human rights, the rule of law, and world peace.

This paper examines the current operation of trafficking in Cambodia, a country that supplies individuals for trafficking; …

Bringing Peace To Darfur And Uganda: A Matter For Sovereign States Or The Icc?, Kate Allan Miss

Kate Allan Miss

Sudan and Uganda challenge our notions of peace and justice. Decades of conflict have left millions dead and displaced. Should the international community react? Should it prosecute? Or should it be deferent to domestic efforts to instill peace through negotiation and amnesty?

The International Criminal Court has assumed jurisdiction over the situations in Sudan and Uganda. The adoption of the ICC Statute at the Rome Conference in 1998 was a landmark event in international law. It expressed States’ intention to cede what was guardedly reserved as a sovereign power to prosecute in exchange for international justice and the prevention of …

The International Control Of Illegal Drugs And The U.N. Treaty Regime: Preventing Or Causing Human Rights Violations?, Daniel P.P. Heilmann Ph.D., Ll.M.

Daniel P.P. Heilmann Ph.D., LL.M.

The article attempts to answer the question whether the international drug control system (i.e. the three conventions on which the U.N. regime is based) is still serviceable in light of recent trends on the illegal drugs markets and whether the regime is up to the standards of modern human rights law. In a first step, the set-up of the international control system is outlined in order to give an overview of the situation (Part II). The second step is to summarize recent trends in global drug markets and to assess the impact of the control system on illicit manufacturing, trafficking …

Parallel Paths And Unintended Consequences: The Role Of Civil Society And The Icc In Rule Of Law Strengthening In Kenya, Christine S. Bjork Ms., Juanita Goebertus Estrada Ms.

Christine S Bjork

This paper examines the nexus between international criminal law and capacity building of domestic criminal justice systems. We question whether the ICC can contribute to either concrete domestic criminal justice reform or broader rule of law strengthening through its so-called preliminary examinations. Using Kenya as a case study, the paper discusses whether the ICC’s preliminary examination that took place between February 2008 and March 2010 (when the Pre-trial Chamber authorized the Prosecutor to open a formal investigation) has provided civil society fighting impunity for the post-election violence with a lever to trigger accountability. We assert that although Kenyan civil society …

The Evolution Of A Partisan: Observations Of A Criminal Defense Attorney At The Ictr, Beth S. Lyons

Beth S. Lyons

No abstract provided.

Using Cognitive Neuroscience As A Basis Upon Which To Accurately Predict The Future Dangerousness Of Violent Criminals And Thus Provide A Procedure For The Involuntary Commitment Of Such Individuals As A Part Of Or Following The Duration Of Their Sentence, Adam Lamparello

Adam Lamparello

No abstract provided.

Samantar V. Yousuf: Development In The Laws Governing Civil Torture Claims In U.S. Courts., Solomon Shinerock

Solomon B. Shinerock

The Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Samantar v. Yousuf forecloses one possible avenue by which former foreign-government officials residing in the United States have sought to escape liability for human rights violations. Ruling simply that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 does not provide immunity to individuals, the decision raises the question of what common law principles will govern the issue in the future. This article reviews the case and the common law doctrines that are likely to figure prominently in future civil suits alleging torture. Ultimately, the Samantar decision read together with existing principles of domestic and international …

Sugarcoating The Eighth Amendment, Christopher J. Declue

Christopher J DeClue

This Article demonstrates that Eighth Amendment gross disproportionality review is virtually identical to the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test. Under the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test, a law is upheld so long as it furthers a conceivable government purpose. Case law illustrates a similar standard is applied in the face of an Eighth Amendment challenge to the length of a prison sentence. Under gross disproportionality review, the length of a sentence is upheld so long as the sentence furthers a conceivable penological purpose. Moreover, under this standard, the length of a sentence violates the Eighth Amendment only on the rare occasion that …

From Enemy Combatant To American Citizen: Protecting Our Constitution, Not Our Enemy, Annie Macaleer

Annie Macaleer

This Article advocates maintaining the use of Combatant Status Review Tribunals and military commissions in the framework that the executive and legislative branches have already established during the Bush administration, despite the Obama administration’s recent policy to try detainees in federal court. Furthermore, this Article argues against the use of Article III criminal courts as an arena to prosecute unlawful enemy combatants.

People V. Bermudez: Is A Freestanding Claim Of Actual, Factual Innocence A Ground For Reversal Under The New York State Constitution?, Gregory C. Rosenfeld

Gregory C Rosenfeld

No abstract provided.

Sugarcoating The Eighth Amendment: Gross Disproportionality Review Is Simply The Fourteenth Amendment Rational-Basis Test, Christopher J. Declue

Christopher J DeClue

It is extremely difficult for a defendant to successfully challenge the length of a sentence under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. To succeed in such a challenge, a defendant must establish that his sentence is grossly disproportionate to the offense. However, the Court has never offered consistent, workable guidelines to determine whether a sentence is grossly disproportionate.

This Article demonstrates that gross disproportionality review is simply a rational-basis test, one which is virtually identical to the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test. Under the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test, a law is upheld so long as it furthers a …

Sugarcoating The Eighth Amendment: Gross Disproportionality Review Is Simply The Fourteenth Amendment Rational-Basis Test, Christopher J. Declue

Christopher J DeClue

It is extremely difficult for a defendant to successfully challenge the length of a sentence under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. To succeed in such a challenge, a defendant must establish that his sentence is grossly disproportionate to the offense. However, the Court has never offered consistent, workable guidelines to determine whether a sentence is grossly disproportionate.

This Article demonstrates that gross disproportionality review is simply a rational-basis test, one which is virtually identical to the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test. Under the Fourteenth Amendment rational-basis test, a law is upheld so long as it furthers a …

Once Upon A Time In Law: Myth, Metaphor, And Authority, Linda H. Edwards

Linda H. Edwards

We have long accepted the role of narrative in fact statements and jury arguments, but in the inner sanctum of analyzing legal authority? Surely not. Yet cases, statutes, rules, and doctrines have stories too. When we talk about legal authority, using all our best formal logic and its bedfellows of analogy and policy, we are actually swimming in a sea of narrative, oblivious to the water around us. As the old Buddhist saying goes, we don’t know who discovered the ocean, but it probably wasn’t a fish.

This article teases out several familiar archetypes hidden in discussions of cases and …

Once Upon A Time In Law: Myth, Metaphor, And Authority, Linda H. Edwards

Linda H. Edwards

We have long accepted the role of narrative in fact statements and jury arguments, but in the inner sanctum of analyzing legal authority? Surely not. Yet cases, statutes, rules, and doctrines have stories too. When we talk about legal authority, using all our best formal logic and its bedfellows of analogy and policy, we are actually swimming in a sea of narrative, oblivious to the water around us. As the old Buddhist saying goes, we don’t know who discovered the ocean, but it probably wasn’t a fish.

This article teases out several familiar archetypes hidden in discussions of cases and …

Once Upon A Time In Law: Myth, Metaphor, And Authority, Linda H. Edwards

Linda H. Edwards

We have long accepted the role of narrative in fact statements and jury arguments, but in the inner sanctum of analyzing legal authority? Surely not. Yet cases, statutes, rules, and doctrines have stories too. When we talk about legal authority, using all our best formal logic and its bedfellows of analogy and policy, we are actually swimming in a sea of narrative, oblivious to the water around us. As the old Buddhist saying goes, we don’t know who discovered the ocean, but it probably wasn’t a fish.

This article teases out several familiar archetypes hidden in discussions of cases and …

Justifying The Distinction Between Justifications And Power, Miriam Gur-Arye

Miriam Gur-Arye Professor

In Anglo-American legal systems criminal law justifications apply to both public officials exercising legal power (as when a police officer arrests a suspect) and, in exceptional circumstances (such as self-defense) to individuals infringing interests protected by the criminal law. This paper relies on Hohfeld's distinction between "Powers" and "Claim Rights" and argues that there are two kinds of criminal law justifications. Public officials who arrest a suspect or who sentence a defendant to imprisonment exercise their power to change the legal status of the suspect's or the defendant's right to free movement. By contrast, an individual who kills an aggressor …

Sexual Abuse Of Power, Michal Buchhandler-Raphael

michal buchhandler-raphael

This Article argues that sexual abuses of power stemming from professional and institutional relationships justify criminalization. At a normative-theoretical level, the Article contends that coerced submission to unwanted sexual acts in professional and institutional settings demonstrates not only unwanted and harmful sexual conduct but also nonconsensual sex. The Article suggests that the current understanding of consent to sexual relations is flawed, because rape law’s contemporary consent standard focuses on an objective permission-giving act, which fails to recognize that even an explicit verbal authorization sometimes constitutes merely apparent consent. This reality calls for adopting a modified definition for consent to sexual …

Sexual Abuse Of Power, Michal Buchhandler-Raphael

michal buchhandler-raphael

This Article argues that sexual abuses of power stemming from professional and institutional relationships justify criminalization. At a normative-theoretical level, the Article contends that coerced submission to unwanted sexual acts in professional and institutional settings demonstrates not only unwanted and harmful sexual conduct but also nonconsensual sex. The Article suggests that the current understanding of consent to sexual relations is flawed, because rape law’s contemporary consent standard focuses on an objective permission-giving act, which fails to recognize that even an explicit verbal authorization sometimes constitutes merely apparent consent. This reality calls for adopting a modified definition for consent to sexual …

The Intent Doctrine And Cerd: How The United States Fails To Meet Its International Obligations In Racial Discrimination Jurisprudence, Audrey Daniel

Audrey Daniel

This article explores the United States’ constitutional discrimination standard, first annunciated in Washington v. Davis, within the context of its international human rights obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD). It posits that the United States falls short of its obligations by imposing on plaintiffs the heavy burden of demonstrating intentional discrimination, while CERD requires party states to redress all racial discrimination claims that meet a lower disparate impact standard. A near-universally supported convention, many of CERD’s other party states have adopted the disparate impact standard that is equipped to deal with latent …

42 U.S.C. § 1983: A Legal Vehicle With No International Human Rights Treaty Passengers, Matthew J. Jowanna

Matthew J. Jowanna

How do international human rights treaties interact with the domestic civil rights law of the United States, and particularly 42 U.S.C. § 1983? How should international human rights treaties interact with the domestic civil rights law of the United States? “International law is part of our law, and must be ascertained and administered by the courts of justice of appropriate jurisdiction as often as questions of right depending upon it are duly presented for their determination.” Whether fully implemented in domestic law or not, the United States is obligated to respect the international treaties it ratifies. However, exactly how has …

Rule Of Law Reform Without Cultural Imperialism: Reinforcing Customary Justice Through Collateral Review In Southern Sudan, David Pimentel

David Pimentel

Rule of Law reform efforts in developing areas face daunting challenges: (1) the stigma of imperialism when Western-style institutions are imposed, (2) the unwillingness of local communities to embrace the reforms, and (3) a severe shortage of resources—human, physical, and financial. At the same time, some of these developing and post-conflict societies have highly functional customary law institutions (in Africa, e.g., a tribal chief applying a customary law handed down by oral tradition). These systems enjoy public confidence and function on very limited budgets—often providing prompt and accessible dispute resolution in the community. Unfortunately these indigenous systems do not always …

Qualitative And Quantitative Proportionality - A Specific Critique Of Retributivism, John D. Castiglione

John D. Castiglione

This Article presents a normative model of proportionality review under the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. I divide proportionality into two organizing concepts: “qualitative proportionality,” which concerns the methods used to punish the individual and the conditions under which he serves his sentence, and “quantitative proportionality,” which concerns the temporal length of the sentence imposed. I argue that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause is best understood to mandate review of the qualitative proportionality of the sentence, but not the quantitative proportionality of the punishment. The most significant feature of this model is an appreciation for the role of human …

Mapping A Responsibility Of Corporations For Violations Of International Humanitarian Law Sailing Between International And Domestic Legal Orders, Regis Bismuth

Denver Journal of International Law & Policy

No abstract provided.