Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Sexuality and the Law (5)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Family Law (2)
-
- Torts (2)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (1)
- Cognitive Psychology (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Mental and Social Health (1)
- Other Mental and Social Health (1)
- Other Public Health (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social Psychology (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 15 of 15
Full-Text Articles in Entire DC Network
Proportionality And Prosecutorial Discretion: Challenges To The Constitutionality Of Georgia’S Death Penalty Laws And Procedures Amidst The Deficiencies Of The State’S Mandatory Appellate Review Structure, Kristen M. Nugent
Kristen Nugent
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent denial of certiorari in Walker v. Georgia—in which Justice Stevens and Justice Thomas expressed sharply divergent interpretations of the Court’s precedent regarding the importance of a thorough proportionality review to Georgia’s capital sentencing scheme—the Court seems poised to reexamine the constitutional implications of Georgia’s death penalty statute and the manner in which it is implemented. In anticipation of such an analysis, and in order to advocate that the U.S. Supreme Court clarify its position in a way that aligns with its longstanding tradition of requiring moderation in the infliction of death, this article dissects …
A Jurisprudence Of Dogmatism: Religion, Rationality And The Case For Homosexual Rights, Dylan Zorea
A Jurisprudence Of Dogmatism: Religion, Rationality And The Case For Homosexual Rights, Dylan Zorea
dylan zorea
I contend that arguments derived from religious beliefs are incompatible with Constitutional jurisprudence because such views are generally irrational, and consequently, judicially incontestable. Yet, due to the significance of religion in the lives of many citizens, such arguments have continually intruded into matters of law and public policy. This has been the case particularly regarding the issue of homosexual rights, where a religiously grounded animus has made it difficult for gay and lesbian persons to enjoy the full protection of law. Because religious arguments cannot be rationally justified they must be excluded from judicial analysis. I will further argue that …
The Poor As A Suspect Class Under The Equal Protection Clause: An Open Constitutional Question, Henry Rose
The Poor As A Suspect Class Under The Equal Protection Clause: An Open Constitutional Question, Henry Rose
Henry Rose
(Abstract) The Poor as a Suspect Class Under the Equal Protection Clause: An Open Constitutional Question Both judges and legal scholars assert that the United States Supreme Court has held that the poor are neither a quasi-suspect nor a suspect class under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. They further assert that this issue was decided by the Supreme Court in San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973). It is the thesis of this article that the Supreme Court has not yet decided whether the poor are a quasi-suspect …
Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Body And Soul: Equality, Pregnancy, And The Unitary Right To Abortion, Jennifer S. Hendricks
Jennifer S. Hendricks
This Article explores equality-based arguments for abortion rights, revealing both their necessity and their pitfalls. It first uses the narrowness of the “health exception” to abortion regulations to show why equality arguments are needed—because our legal tradition's conception of liberty is based on male experience, and we have no theory of basic human rights grounded in women's reproductive experiences. Next, however, the Article shows that equality arguments, although necessary, can undermine women's reproductive freedom because they require that pregnancy and abortion be analogized to male experiences. The result is that equality arguments focus on either the bodily or the social …
Don't Tap, Don't Stare, And Keep Your Hands To Yourself! Critiquing The Legality Of Gay Sting Operations, Jordan Woods
Don't Tap, Don't Stare, And Keep Your Hands To Yourself! Critiquing The Legality Of Gay Sting Operations, Jordan Woods
Jordan Blair Woods
'Activist Courts,' Misleading Wedge Politics And The Tragedy Of Proposition 8, M. Katherine B. Darmer
'Activist Courts,' Misleading Wedge Politics And The Tragedy Of Proposition 8, M. Katherine B. Darmer
M. Katherine B. Darmer
This paper explains that Proposition 8 was uniquely devastating in that it stripped vested marriage rights away from a protected minoirty group. Previously, where voters sought to define marriage narrowly to exlude gay and lesbian couples, voters did so in advance of gay and lesbian couples having such rights. The paper defends the California Supreme Court's decision in the May 15, 2008 "Marriage Cases," criticizes misleading advertising ploys of the Proposition 8 campaign and broadly defends the role of the courts in ensuring equal protection, drawing parallels between the current fight for marriage equality and earlier fights for the rights …
Discriminatory Acquittal, Tania Tetlow
Discriminatory Acquittal, Tania Tetlow
Tania Tetlow
This Article is the first to analyze a pervasive and unexplored constitutional problem: the rights of crime victims against unconstitutional discrimination by juries. From the Emmett Till trial to that of Rodney King, there is a long history of juries acquitting white defendants charged with violence against black victims. Modern empirical evidence continues to show a devaluation of black victims; dramatic disparities exist in death sentence and rape conviction rates according to the race of the victim. Moreover, just as juries have permitted violence against those who allegedly violated the racial order, juries use acquittals to punish female victims of …
Moving Beyond The 'Immutability Debate' In The Fight For Equality After, M. Katherine B. Darmer
Moving Beyond The 'Immutability Debate' In The Fight For Equality After, M. Katherine B. Darmer
M. Katherine B. Darmer
On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its historic decision regarding marriage rights for same-sex couples. In the course of its opinion, the court found that classifications based upon sexual orientation are subject to the protections of "strict scrutiny" for purposes of the state's equal protection clause. The court also found that marriage is a fundamental right that extends to same-sex couples.
On November 4, 2008, 52% of California voters voted for Proposition 8, which purported to "amend" the state constitution by adding fourteen words in a new clause following the equal protection clause: "only marriage between a …
Theorizing And Litigating The Rights Of Sexual Minorities, Nancy Levit
Theorizing And Litigating The Rights Of Sexual Minorities, Nancy Levit
Nancy Levit
One of the best measures of a society is how it treats its vulnerable groups. A central idea in Professor Martha Nussbaum's writings is that all humans "are of equal dignity and worth, no matter where they are situated in society." The strategic challenge in lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered (LGBT) rights litigation is how to get courts to see sexual minorities as people worthy of equal dignity and respect. This article focuses on the roles of a positive emotion - love - and a procedural method of proof - science - in the shaping of laws defining the rights …
The State Marriage Cases: Implications For Hawaii's Marriage Equality Debate In The Post-Romer And Lawrence Era, Kristin D. Shotwell
The State Marriage Cases: Implications For Hawaii's Marriage Equality Debate In The Post-Romer And Lawrence Era, Kristin D. Shotwell
Kristin D Shotwell
No abstract provided.
Ten Questions On Gay Rights And Freedom Of Religion, Wilson Huhn
Ten Questions On Gay Rights And Freedom Of Religion, Wilson Huhn
Wilson R. Huhn
In my opinion most of the legal and social problems that arise under the Constitution stem from the belief, held by some people, that they are better than other people. They do not hate anyone. They simply believe that they are superior and that the law ought to treat them better than the other group. This is true of whites who think they are superior to blacks, men who think they are superior to women, and heterosexuals who think they are superior to homosexuals.
People have often justified these types of beliefs by appeal to religion and have attempted to …
A (Trans) Gender-Inclusive Equal Protection Analysis Of Public Female Toplessness, Luke Boso
A (Trans) Gender-Inclusive Equal Protection Analysis Of Public Female Toplessness, Luke Boso
Luke A. Boso
Federal, state, and municipal laws have long regulated, and often blanketly prohibited, the exposure of female breasts in public venues for a variety of purported reasons. Generally worded to prohibit the exhibition of the “female breast with less than a fully opaque covering or any portion thereof below the top of the nipple,” nudity-regulating laws lack a similar provision for male breasts, and, in fact, exclude the male torso from coverage entirely.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s sex-based discrimination jurisprudence, advocates for topfree equality have repeatedly challenged these laws in court, arguing that they violate U.S. and state constitutions’ equal …
The Short, Puzzling(?) Life Of The Civil Union, John G. Culhane
The Short, Puzzling(?) Life Of The Civil Union, John G. Culhane
John G. Culhane
In the battle for marriage equality, equal protection has proven to be a more successful strategy than fundamental rights. This outcome is perhaps surprising, given that civil unions arguably afford at least "formal" equality to same-sex couples. Yet the supreme courts of Connecticut and California have emphasized the denial of equality that the difference in names connotes - civil unions or domestic partnerships v. marriage - and therefore have moved dramatically towards real equality. These two courts were the first to declare that sexual orientation is a suspect (California) or quasi-suspect (Connecticut) classification, thereby radically changing the debate and the …
The Irrational Woman: Informed Consent And Abortion Decision-Making, Maya Manian
The Irrational Woman: Informed Consent And Abortion Decision-Making, Maya Manian
Maya Manian
In Gonzales v. Carhart, the Supreme Court upheld a federal ban on a type of second-trimester abortion that many physicians believe is safer for their patients. Carhart presented a watershed moment in abortion law, because it marks the Supreme Court’s first use of the anti-abortion movement’s “woman-protective” rationale to uphold a ban on abortion and the first time since Roe v. Wade that the Court denied women a health exception to an abortion restriction. The woman-protective rationale asserts that banning abortion promotes women’s mental health. According to Carhart, the State should make the final decisions about pregnant women’s healthcare, because …
The Usual Suspect Classifications: Criminals, Aliens And The Future Of Same-Sex Marriage, Michael A. Helfand
The Usual Suspect Classifications: Criminals, Aliens And The Future Of Same-Sex Marriage, Michael A. Helfand
Michael A Helfand
In this Article, I argue for a new understanding of the immutability factor employed by courts in determining which classifications ought to receive suspect status under the Equal Protection Clause. Drawing on the process-based foundations of the Equal Protection Clause, this new understanding defines immutable traits not as traits that cannot be changed, but as traits that are in the words of the Supreme Court in Frontiero v. Richardson, mere "accident[s] of birth." In contrast, courts and scholars typically center the immutability inquiry on an individual’s technical ability to exit a particular class, which has led to inconsistencies in …